Relationship of lambda and overshoot of step response for a direct synthesis PI controller

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tan,L. W.
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Raja Ahmad,R. K., Ibrahim,M. N., Taip,F. S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322012000300011
Resumo: The direct synthesis (DS) tuning method is a model-based method for a feedback controller. The main principle of this method is to obtain the controller settings based on a predetermined desired closed loop response. The main advantage is that there is only one parameter to be adjusted, which is lambda (λ), the speed of the desired closed loop response. There are several guidelines available for selecting λ in order to ensure that the closed loop step response matches the desired response. In this paper, a guideline that relates λ and overshoot is proposed and it worked well over a wide range of R varying from 0.05 to 2. For a fair comparison of DS-tuned controllers with different λ guidelines, both performance and robustness for a unit step change in the set point are considered. It was found that the DS-tuned controller with this proposed guideline performed better and the gain margin (GM) and phase margin (PM) lie between 2≤GM≤5 and 30º≤PM≤75º, respectively. Besides, its overshoot changed less with a ±25% process model mismatch, except for τ mismatch.
id ABEQ-1_c8d95ccd3664152b15a9e7a533dfb71b
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0104-66322012000300011
network_acronym_str ABEQ-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
repository_id_str
spelling Relationship of lambda and overshoot of step response for a direct synthesis PI controllerDirect synthesisLambdaOvershootPI controllerThe direct synthesis (DS) tuning method is a model-based method for a feedback controller. The main principle of this method is to obtain the controller settings based on a predetermined desired closed loop response. The main advantage is that there is only one parameter to be adjusted, which is lambda (λ), the speed of the desired closed loop response. There are several guidelines available for selecting λ in order to ensure that the closed loop step response matches the desired response. In this paper, a guideline that relates λ and overshoot is proposed and it worked well over a wide range of R varying from 0.05 to 2. For a fair comparison of DS-tuned controllers with different λ guidelines, both performance and robustness for a unit step change in the set point are considered. It was found that the DS-tuned controller with this proposed guideline performed better and the gain margin (GM) and phase margin (PM) lie between 2≤GM≤5 and 30º≤PM≤75º, respectively. Besides, its overshoot changed less with a ±25% process model mismatch, except for τ mismatch.Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering2012-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322012000300011Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering v.29 n.3 2012reponame:Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineeringinstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)instacron:ABEQ10.1590/S0104-66322012000300011info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTan,L. W.Raja Ahmad,R. K.Ibrahim,M. N.Taip,F. S.eng2012-10-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-66322012000300011Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjce/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprgiudici@usp.br||rgiudici@usp.br1678-43830104-6632opendoar:2012-10-25T00:00Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Relationship of lambda and overshoot of step response for a direct synthesis PI controller
title Relationship of lambda and overshoot of step response for a direct synthesis PI controller
spellingShingle Relationship of lambda and overshoot of step response for a direct synthesis PI controller
Tan,L. W.
Direct synthesis
Lambda
Overshoot
PI controller
title_short Relationship of lambda and overshoot of step response for a direct synthesis PI controller
title_full Relationship of lambda and overshoot of step response for a direct synthesis PI controller
title_fullStr Relationship of lambda and overshoot of step response for a direct synthesis PI controller
title_full_unstemmed Relationship of lambda and overshoot of step response for a direct synthesis PI controller
title_sort Relationship of lambda and overshoot of step response for a direct synthesis PI controller
author Tan,L. W.
author_facet Tan,L. W.
Raja Ahmad,R. K.
Ibrahim,M. N.
Taip,F. S.
author_role author
author2 Raja Ahmad,R. K.
Ibrahim,M. N.
Taip,F. S.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tan,L. W.
Raja Ahmad,R. K.
Ibrahim,M. N.
Taip,F. S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Direct synthesis
Lambda
Overshoot
PI controller
topic Direct synthesis
Lambda
Overshoot
PI controller
description The direct synthesis (DS) tuning method is a model-based method for a feedback controller. The main principle of this method is to obtain the controller settings based on a predetermined desired closed loop response. The main advantage is that there is only one parameter to be adjusted, which is lambda (λ), the speed of the desired closed loop response. There are several guidelines available for selecting λ in order to ensure that the closed loop step response matches the desired response. In this paper, a guideline that relates λ and overshoot is proposed and it worked well over a wide range of R varying from 0.05 to 2. For a fair comparison of DS-tuned controllers with different λ guidelines, both performance and robustness for a unit step change in the set point are considered. It was found that the DS-tuned controller with this proposed guideline performed better and the gain margin (GM) and phase margin (PM) lie between 2≤GM≤5 and 30º≤PM≤75º, respectively. Besides, its overshoot changed less with a ±25% process model mismatch, except for τ mismatch.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322012000300011
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322012000300011
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0104-66322012000300011
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering v.29 n.3 2012
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)
instacron:ABEQ
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)
instacron_str ABEQ
institution ABEQ
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
collection Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rgiudici@usp.br||rgiudici@usp.br
_version_ 1754213173834022912