3D-printed polylactic acid biopolymer and textile fibers: comparing the degradation process

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: do Bem, Natani Aparecida
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Reitz Cardoso, Flávia Aparecida, de Souza Paccola, Edneia Aparecida, Soto Herek Rezende, Luciana Cristina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.rbciamb.com.br/Publicacoes_RBCIAMB/article/view/1192
Resumo: With the advancement of sustainable actions in the textile industry, biodegradable polymers are considered a potential solution to environmental problems generated by plastic waste. In particular, renewable polyesters, such as polylactic acid (PLA), are the most promising bioresorbable materials for application in consumer areas, such as the textile industry, which is one of the largest segments responsible for waste generation. Based on these considerations, the objective was to investigate the degradability of 3D-printed PLA biopolymer, compared to the degradability of natural and synthetic textile fibers (cotton and polyester). The comparison was carried out with samples of materials degraded in soil and exposed to the weather for 120 days. Significant results were obtained for mass loss, as follows: 13.4% PLA; 8.9% cotton/flat, and 3.84% polyester/flat. As for the loss of area, the results were 46.5% for PLA; 15.4% for cotton/knit; and 6.25% for polyester/knit. The composition of the analyzed materials is one of the factors that can determine the period of degradation, since natural fiber fabrics present faster decomposition due to the presence of microorganisms. Another point to highlight is the material construction, as the knitted fabric is more unstable compared to flat fabric, its bonds tend to break more easily resulting in a different degradation process for flat, knit, and non-woven materials.
id ABES-2_217b22c044298bb8b35c1a4aa4a1f3a5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.rbciamb.com.br:article/1192
network_acronym_str ABES-2
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling 3D-printed polylactic acid biopolymer and textile fibers: comparing the degradation processBiopolímero ácido polilático impresso em 3D e fibras têxteis: um comparativo do processo de degradaçãodegradabilidade; manufatura aditiva; tecido.degradability; additive manufacturing; fabric.With the advancement of sustainable actions in the textile industry, biodegradable polymers are considered a potential solution to environmental problems generated by plastic waste. In particular, renewable polyesters, such as polylactic acid (PLA), are the most promising bioresorbable materials for application in consumer areas, such as the textile industry, which is one of the largest segments responsible for waste generation. Based on these considerations, the objective was to investigate the degradability of 3D-printed PLA biopolymer, compared to the degradability of natural and synthetic textile fibers (cotton and polyester). The comparison was carried out with samples of materials degraded in soil and exposed to the weather for 120 days. Significant results were obtained for mass loss, as follows: 13.4% PLA; 8.9% cotton/flat, and 3.84% polyester/flat. As for the loss of area, the results were 46.5% for PLA; 15.4% for cotton/knit; and 6.25% for polyester/knit. The composition of the analyzed materials is one of the factors that can determine the period of degradation, since natural fiber fabrics present faster decomposition due to the presence of microorganisms. Another point to highlight is the material construction, as the knitted fabric is more unstable compared to flat fabric, its bonds tend to break more easily resulting in a different degradation process for flat, knit, and non-woven materials.Com o avanço de ações sustentáveis na indústria têxtil, os polímeros biodegradáveis ​​são vistos como potencial solução para os problemas ambientais gerados por resíduos plásticos. Os poliésteres renováveis como o ácido polilático (PLA), particularmente, constituem os materiais bioreabsorvíveis mais promissores para aplicações nas áreas de consumo, como a indústria têxtil, um dos maiores segmentos responsáveis pela geração de resíduos. Com base nessas considerações, objetivou-se investigar a degradabilidade do biopolímero PLA impresso em 3D, comparado à degradabilidade das fibras têxteis naturais e sintéticas (algodão e poliéster). O comparativo foi realizado por meio de amostras dos materiais degradadas em solo e expostas às intempéries por 120 dias. Foram obtidos resultados significativos para a perda de massa, sendo: 13,4% PLA; 8,9% algodão/plano e 3,84% poliéster/plano. Já para a perda de área se obtiveram 46,5% PLA; 15,4% algodão/malha e 6,25% poliéster (malha). Observou-se que a composição dos materiais analisados é um dos fatores que pode determinar o período de degradação, pois os tecidos com fibras têxteis oriundas de fontes naturais apresentam decomposição mais rápida em razão da presença de microrganismos. Outro ponto a destacar é a construção dos materiais: observou-se que pelo fato de a malha ser mais instável comparada ao tecido plano, suas ligações tendem a se romper com mais facilidade, resultando em um processo de degradação diferente para os materiais plano, malha e não tecido.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental (ABES)2022-07-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://www.rbciamb.com.br/Publicacoes_RBCIAMB/article/view/119210.5327/Z2176-94781192Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais (RBCIAMB); v. 57 n. 2 (2022): RBCIAMB - ISSN 2176-9478 - Junho; 302-319Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais (RBCIAMB); Vol. 57 No. 2 (2022): RBCIAMB - ISSN 2176-9478 - June; 302-3192176-94781808-4524reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental (ABES)instacron:ABESenghttps://www.rbciamb.com.br/Publicacoes_RBCIAMB/article/view/1192/779https://www.rbciamb.com.br/Publicacoes_RBCIAMB/article/view/1192/813Copyright (c) 2022 Brazilian Journal of Environmental Sciences (Online)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessdo Bem, Natani AparecidaReitz Cardoso, Flávia Aparecidade Souza Paccola, Edneia AparecidaSoto Herek Rezende, Luciana Cristina2023-11-09T17:38:43Zoai:ojs.www.rbciamb.com.br:article/1192Revistahttp://www.rbciamb.com.br/index.php/Publicacoes_RBCIAMBhttps://www.rbciamb.com.br/Publicacoes_RBCIAMB/oairbciamb@abes-dn.org.br||2176-94781804-4524opendoar:2023-11-09T17:38:43Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental (ABES)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv 3D-printed polylactic acid biopolymer and textile fibers: comparing the degradation process
Biopolímero ácido polilático impresso em 3D e fibras têxteis: um comparativo do processo de degradação
title 3D-printed polylactic acid biopolymer and textile fibers: comparing the degradation process
spellingShingle 3D-printed polylactic acid biopolymer and textile fibers: comparing the degradation process
do Bem, Natani Aparecida
degradabilidade; manufatura aditiva; tecido.
degradability; additive manufacturing; fabric.
title_short 3D-printed polylactic acid biopolymer and textile fibers: comparing the degradation process
title_full 3D-printed polylactic acid biopolymer and textile fibers: comparing the degradation process
title_fullStr 3D-printed polylactic acid biopolymer and textile fibers: comparing the degradation process
title_full_unstemmed 3D-printed polylactic acid biopolymer and textile fibers: comparing the degradation process
title_sort 3D-printed polylactic acid biopolymer and textile fibers: comparing the degradation process
author do Bem, Natani Aparecida
author_facet do Bem, Natani Aparecida
Reitz Cardoso, Flávia Aparecida
de Souza Paccola, Edneia Aparecida
Soto Herek Rezende, Luciana Cristina
author_role author
author2 Reitz Cardoso, Flávia Aparecida
de Souza Paccola, Edneia Aparecida
Soto Herek Rezende, Luciana Cristina
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv do Bem, Natani Aparecida
Reitz Cardoso, Flávia Aparecida
de Souza Paccola, Edneia Aparecida
Soto Herek Rezende, Luciana Cristina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv degradabilidade; manufatura aditiva; tecido.
degradability; additive manufacturing; fabric.
topic degradabilidade; manufatura aditiva; tecido.
degradability; additive manufacturing; fabric.
description With the advancement of sustainable actions in the textile industry, biodegradable polymers are considered a potential solution to environmental problems generated by plastic waste. In particular, renewable polyesters, such as polylactic acid (PLA), are the most promising bioresorbable materials for application in consumer areas, such as the textile industry, which is one of the largest segments responsible for waste generation. Based on these considerations, the objective was to investigate the degradability of 3D-printed PLA biopolymer, compared to the degradability of natural and synthetic textile fibers (cotton and polyester). The comparison was carried out with samples of materials degraded in soil and exposed to the weather for 120 days. Significant results were obtained for mass loss, as follows: 13.4% PLA; 8.9% cotton/flat, and 3.84% polyester/flat. As for the loss of area, the results were 46.5% for PLA; 15.4% for cotton/knit; and 6.25% for polyester/knit. The composition of the analyzed materials is one of the factors that can determine the period of degradation, since natural fiber fabrics present faster decomposition due to the presence of microorganisms. Another point to highlight is the material construction, as the knitted fabric is more unstable compared to flat fabric, its bonds tend to break more easily resulting in a different degradation process for flat, knit, and non-woven materials.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.rbciamb.com.br/Publicacoes_RBCIAMB/article/view/1192
10.5327/Z2176-94781192
url https://www.rbciamb.com.br/Publicacoes_RBCIAMB/article/view/1192
identifier_str_mv 10.5327/Z2176-94781192
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.rbciamb.com.br/Publicacoes_RBCIAMB/article/view/1192/779
https://www.rbciamb.com.br/Publicacoes_RBCIAMB/article/view/1192/813
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Brazilian Journal of Environmental Sciences (Online)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Brazilian Journal of Environmental Sciences (Online)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental (ABES)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental (ABES)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais (RBCIAMB); v. 57 n. 2 (2022): RBCIAMB - ISSN 2176-9478 - Junho; 302-319
Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais (RBCIAMB); Vol. 57 No. 2 (2022): RBCIAMB - ISSN 2176-9478 - June; 302-319
2176-9478
1808-4524
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental (ABES)
instacron:ABES
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental (ABES)
instacron_str ABES
institution ABES
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental (ABES)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbciamb@abes-dn.org.br||
_version_ 1797068918604431360