Agronomic parameters assessment in hydroponic tomato crop

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Herrero,Baudilio
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Blázquez,María Elena, Cristóbal,María Dolores
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Horticultura Brasileira
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-05362014000400385
Resumo: In this study we present the results of a comparative analysis of nutrient solution (NS) recycling and non-recycling treatments in hydroponic tomato crop. The established aims are to evaluate water consumption, pH and conductivity variation along the productive cycle in both treatments, to establish the differences in fruit yield and to assess the viability of the recycling system. Watering times and drained nutrient solution volume were counted on a daily basis. Emitter and drained water samples from both treatments were analyzed once per week in the Agricultural Institute of Fraisoro (Gipuzkoa). Tomato samples were collected, weighed and measured three times per week once the harvest had started. There was an 8% reduction in water supply; irrigation excess was between 11-38% and water supply efficiency was 6.7% higher in the recycling treatment in comparison to the non-recycling treatment. Drainage pH values fluctuated from 3.9-7.6 and conductivity varied from 1.9-3.6 mS/cm. Average yield per plant was 7.17 kg/plant. No significant differences were found regarding fruit yield, except for the commercialized smaller size tomatoes (diameter 57-67 mm) whose production was 226% higher in the non-recycling area. Fruit yield was not increased by the recycling technique in hydroponic crop. Recycling treatment viability has to be measured in terms of water and fertilizers saving and minimization of polluting waste in drainage solutions.
id ABH-1_12d35d06b54d90e6d5551bd48c2afc3c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-05362014000400385
network_acronym_str ABH-1
network_name_str Horticultura Brasileira
repository_id_str
spelling Agronomic parameters assessment in hydroponic tomato cropLycopersicon esculentumhydroponic cropno recyclingrecyclingyield.In this study we present the results of a comparative analysis of nutrient solution (NS) recycling and non-recycling treatments in hydroponic tomato crop. The established aims are to evaluate water consumption, pH and conductivity variation along the productive cycle in both treatments, to establish the differences in fruit yield and to assess the viability of the recycling system. Watering times and drained nutrient solution volume were counted on a daily basis. Emitter and drained water samples from both treatments were analyzed once per week in the Agricultural Institute of Fraisoro (Gipuzkoa). Tomato samples were collected, weighed and measured three times per week once the harvest had started. There was an 8% reduction in water supply; irrigation excess was between 11-38% and water supply efficiency was 6.7% higher in the recycling treatment in comparison to the non-recycling treatment. Drainage pH values fluctuated from 3.9-7.6 and conductivity varied from 1.9-3.6 mS/cm. Average yield per plant was 7.17 kg/plant. No significant differences were found regarding fruit yield, except for the commercialized smaller size tomatoes (diameter 57-67 mm) whose production was 226% higher in the non-recycling area. Fruit yield was not increased by the recycling technique in hydroponic crop. Recycling treatment viability has to be measured in terms of water and fertilizers saving and minimization of polluting waste in drainage solutions.Associação Brasileira de Horticultura2014-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-05362014000400385Horticultura Brasileira v.32 n.4 2014reponame:Horticultura Brasileirainstname:Associação Brasileira de Horticultura (ABH)instacron:ABH10.1590/S0102-053620140000400003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHerrero,BaudilioBlázquez,María ElenaCristóbal,María Doloreseng2014-11-05T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-05362014000400385Revistahttp://cms.horticulturabrasileira.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||hortbras@gmail.com1806-99910102-0536opendoar:2014-11-05T00:00Horticultura Brasileira - Associação Brasileira de Horticultura (ABH)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Agronomic parameters assessment in hydroponic tomato crop
title Agronomic parameters assessment in hydroponic tomato crop
spellingShingle Agronomic parameters assessment in hydroponic tomato crop
Herrero,Baudilio
Lycopersicon esculentum
hydroponic crop
no recycling
recycling
yield.
title_short Agronomic parameters assessment in hydroponic tomato crop
title_full Agronomic parameters assessment in hydroponic tomato crop
title_fullStr Agronomic parameters assessment in hydroponic tomato crop
title_full_unstemmed Agronomic parameters assessment in hydroponic tomato crop
title_sort Agronomic parameters assessment in hydroponic tomato crop
author Herrero,Baudilio
author_facet Herrero,Baudilio
Blázquez,María Elena
Cristóbal,María Dolores
author_role author
author2 Blázquez,María Elena
Cristóbal,María Dolores
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Herrero,Baudilio
Blázquez,María Elena
Cristóbal,María Dolores
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Lycopersicon esculentum
hydroponic crop
no recycling
recycling
yield.
topic Lycopersicon esculentum
hydroponic crop
no recycling
recycling
yield.
description In this study we present the results of a comparative analysis of nutrient solution (NS) recycling and non-recycling treatments in hydroponic tomato crop. The established aims are to evaluate water consumption, pH and conductivity variation along the productive cycle in both treatments, to establish the differences in fruit yield and to assess the viability of the recycling system. Watering times and drained nutrient solution volume were counted on a daily basis. Emitter and drained water samples from both treatments were analyzed once per week in the Agricultural Institute of Fraisoro (Gipuzkoa). Tomato samples were collected, weighed and measured three times per week once the harvest had started. There was an 8% reduction in water supply; irrigation excess was between 11-38% and water supply efficiency was 6.7% higher in the recycling treatment in comparison to the non-recycling treatment. Drainage pH values fluctuated from 3.9-7.6 and conductivity varied from 1.9-3.6 mS/cm. Average yield per plant was 7.17 kg/plant. No significant differences were found regarding fruit yield, except for the commercialized smaller size tomatoes (diameter 57-67 mm) whose production was 226% higher in the non-recycling area. Fruit yield was not increased by the recycling technique in hydroponic crop. Recycling treatment viability has to be measured in terms of water and fertilizers saving and minimization of polluting waste in drainage solutions.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-05362014000400385
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-05362014000400385
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0102-053620140000400003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Horticultura
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Horticultura
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Horticultura Brasileira v.32 n.4 2014
reponame:Horticultura Brasileira
instname:Associação Brasileira de Horticultura (ABH)
instacron:ABH
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Horticultura (ABH)
instacron_str ABH
institution ABH
reponame_str Horticultura Brasileira
collection Horticultura Brasileira
repository.name.fl_str_mv Horticultura Brasileira - Associação Brasileira de Horticultura (ABH)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||hortbras@gmail.com
_version_ 1754213082488373248