Is it feasible to use granulocyte-colony stimulating factor alone to mobilize progenitor cells in multiple myeloma patients induced with a cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone regimen?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Crusoe,Edvan de Queiroz
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Higashi,Fabiana, Martinez,Gracia Aparecida, Barros,José Carlos, Bellesso,Marcelo, Rossato,Marina, Marret,Ana Cinira F., Chiattone,Carlos Sérgio, Hungria,Vania Tietsch de Moraes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-84842016000400302
Resumo: ABSTRACT Background: Cyclophosphamide plus thalidomide as induction for multiple myeloma patients eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation may be a limiting factor for cell mobilization. The minimum acceptable mobilized peripheral blood stem cell count to prevent deleterious effects during transplantation is 2.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Combining other treatments to granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, such as cyclophosphamide, could overcome the mobilization limitation. The objective of this study was to assess the number of CD34+ cells mobilized using granulocyte-colony stimulating factor with and without cyclophosphamide after induction with cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone. Methods: A retrospective study was performed of a cohort of multiple myeloma patients submitted to autologous stem cell transplantations at two Brazilian centers between May 2009 and July 2013. The oral cyclophosphamide and thalidomide induction doses used were 1500 mg/month and 100-200 mg/day, respectively. Mobilization doses were 10-15 mcg/kg granulocyte-colony stimulating factor with 2-4 g/m2 cyclophosphamide, or 15-20 mcg/kg granulocyte-colony stimulating factor alone for 5 days. Collection of >2.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg was considered sufficient. Results: Eighty-eight patients were analyzed; only 18 received cyclophosphamide. The median age was 58 years old (range: 51-62) for the granulocyte-colony stimulating factor group and 56.5 years old (range: 54-60) for granulocyte-colony stimulating factor plus cyclophosphamide group. Fifty-two patients were male. Eighty cases (90.9%) were Durie-Salmon Staging System III-A/B and 38 (44.7%) and 20 cases (23.5%) were International Staging System 2 and 3, respectively. The group that received cyclophosphamide collected a higher median number of progenitor cells [3.8 (range: 3.1-4.4) vs. 3.2 (range: 2.3-3.8)] (p-value = 0.008). No correlation was observed between better responses or number of induction cycles and the number of cells collected. Conclusion: The number of cells mobilized with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor plus cyclophosphamide was higher. However, in both groups, the median number of CD34+ cells was sufficient to perform a single autologous stem cell transplantation; no deleterious effects were reported during harvesting.
id ABHHTC-1_02a2c77a06b6f45e69c8af18cde5b280
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-84842016000400302
network_acronym_str ABHHTC-1
network_name_str Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Is it feasible to use granulocyte-colony stimulating factor alone to mobilize progenitor cells in multiple myeloma patients induced with a cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone regimen?Bone marrow transplantationMultiple myelomaGranulocyte-colony stimulating factorCyclophosphamideABSTRACT Background: Cyclophosphamide plus thalidomide as induction for multiple myeloma patients eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation may be a limiting factor for cell mobilization. The minimum acceptable mobilized peripheral blood stem cell count to prevent deleterious effects during transplantation is 2.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Combining other treatments to granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, such as cyclophosphamide, could overcome the mobilization limitation. The objective of this study was to assess the number of CD34+ cells mobilized using granulocyte-colony stimulating factor with and without cyclophosphamide after induction with cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone. Methods: A retrospective study was performed of a cohort of multiple myeloma patients submitted to autologous stem cell transplantations at two Brazilian centers between May 2009 and July 2013. The oral cyclophosphamide and thalidomide induction doses used were 1500 mg/month and 100-200 mg/day, respectively. Mobilization doses were 10-15 mcg/kg granulocyte-colony stimulating factor with 2-4 g/m2 cyclophosphamide, or 15-20 mcg/kg granulocyte-colony stimulating factor alone for 5 days. Collection of >2.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg was considered sufficient. Results: Eighty-eight patients were analyzed; only 18 received cyclophosphamide. The median age was 58 years old (range: 51-62) for the granulocyte-colony stimulating factor group and 56.5 years old (range: 54-60) for granulocyte-colony stimulating factor plus cyclophosphamide group. Fifty-two patients were male. Eighty cases (90.9%) were Durie-Salmon Staging System III-A/B and 38 (44.7%) and 20 cases (23.5%) were International Staging System 2 and 3, respectively. The group that received cyclophosphamide collected a higher median number of progenitor cells [3.8 (range: 3.1-4.4) vs. 3.2 (range: 2.3-3.8)] (p-value = 0.008). No correlation was observed between better responses or number of induction cycles and the number of cells collected. Conclusion: The number of cells mobilized with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor plus cyclophosphamide was higher. However, in both groups, the median number of CD34+ cells was sufficient to perform a single autologous stem cell transplantation; no deleterious effects were reported during harvesting.Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular2016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-84842016000400302Revista Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia v.38 n.4 2016reponame:Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular (ABHHTC)instacron:ABHHTC10.1016/j.bjhh.2016.06.004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCrusoe,Edvan de QueirozHigashi,FabianaMartinez,Gracia AparecidaBarros,José CarlosBellesso,MarceloRossato,MarinaMarret,Ana Cinira F.Chiattone,Carlos SérgioHungria,Vania Tietsch de Moraeseng2017-03-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-84842016000400302Revistahttp://www.rbhh.org/pt/archivo/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpsbhh@terra.com.br||secretaria@rbhh.org1806-08701516-8484opendoar:2017-03-30T00:00Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular (ABHHTC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is it feasible to use granulocyte-colony stimulating factor alone to mobilize progenitor cells in multiple myeloma patients induced with a cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone regimen?
title Is it feasible to use granulocyte-colony stimulating factor alone to mobilize progenitor cells in multiple myeloma patients induced with a cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone regimen?
spellingShingle Is it feasible to use granulocyte-colony stimulating factor alone to mobilize progenitor cells in multiple myeloma patients induced with a cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone regimen?
Crusoe,Edvan de Queiroz
Bone marrow transplantation
Multiple myeloma
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor
Cyclophosphamide
title_short Is it feasible to use granulocyte-colony stimulating factor alone to mobilize progenitor cells in multiple myeloma patients induced with a cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone regimen?
title_full Is it feasible to use granulocyte-colony stimulating factor alone to mobilize progenitor cells in multiple myeloma patients induced with a cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone regimen?
title_fullStr Is it feasible to use granulocyte-colony stimulating factor alone to mobilize progenitor cells in multiple myeloma patients induced with a cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone regimen?
title_full_unstemmed Is it feasible to use granulocyte-colony stimulating factor alone to mobilize progenitor cells in multiple myeloma patients induced with a cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone regimen?
title_sort Is it feasible to use granulocyte-colony stimulating factor alone to mobilize progenitor cells in multiple myeloma patients induced with a cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone regimen?
author Crusoe,Edvan de Queiroz
author_facet Crusoe,Edvan de Queiroz
Higashi,Fabiana
Martinez,Gracia Aparecida
Barros,José Carlos
Bellesso,Marcelo
Rossato,Marina
Marret,Ana Cinira F.
Chiattone,Carlos Sérgio
Hungria,Vania Tietsch de Moraes
author_role author
author2 Higashi,Fabiana
Martinez,Gracia Aparecida
Barros,José Carlos
Bellesso,Marcelo
Rossato,Marina
Marret,Ana Cinira F.
Chiattone,Carlos Sérgio
Hungria,Vania Tietsch de Moraes
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Crusoe,Edvan de Queiroz
Higashi,Fabiana
Martinez,Gracia Aparecida
Barros,José Carlos
Bellesso,Marcelo
Rossato,Marina
Marret,Ana Cinira F.
Chiattone,Carlos Sérgio
Hungria,Vania Tietsch de Moraes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bone marrow transplantation
Multiple myeloma
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor
Cyclophosphamide
topic Bone marrow transplantation
Multiple myeloma
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor
Cyclophosphamide
description ABSTRACT Background: Cyclophosphamide plus thalidomide as induction for multiple myeloma patients eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation may be a limiting factor for cell mobilization. The minimum acceptable mobilized peripheral blood stem cell count to prevent deleterious effects during transplantation is 2.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Combining other treatments to granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, such as cyclophosphamide, could overcome the mobilization limitation. The objective of this study was to assess the number of CD34+ cells mobilized using granulocyte-colony stimulating factor with and without cyclophosphamide after induction with cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone. Methods: A retrospective study was performed of a cohort of multiple myeloma patients submitted to autologous stem cell transplantations at two Brazilian centers between May 2009 and July 2013. The oral cyclophosphamide and thalidomide induction doses used were 1500 mg/month and 100-200 mg/day, respectively. Mobilization doses were 10-15 mcg/kg granulocyte-colony stimulating factor with 2-4 g/m2 cyclophosphamide, or 15-20 mcg/kg granulocyte-colony stimulating factor alone for 5 days. Collection of >2.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg was considered sufficient. Results: Eighty-eight patients were analyzed; only 18 received cyclophosphamide. The median age was 58 years old (range: 51-62) for the granulocyte-colony stimulating factor group and 56.5 years old (range: 54-60) for granulocyte-colony stimulating factor plus cyclophosphamide group. Fifty-two patients were male. Eighty cases (90.9%) were Durie-Salmon Staging System III-A/B and 38 (44.7%) and 20 cases (23.5%) were International Staging System 2 and 3, respectively. The group that received cyclophosphamide collected a higher median number of progenitor cells [3.8 (range: 3.1-4.4) vs. 3.2 (range: 2.3-3.8)] (p-value = 0.008). No correlation was observed between better responses or number of induction cycles and the number of cells collected. Conclusion: The number of cells mobilized with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor plus cyclophosphamide was higher. However, in both groups, the median number of CD34+ cells was sufficient to perform a single autologous stem cell transplantation; no deleterious effects were reported during harvesting.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-84842016000400302
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-84842016000400302
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjhh.2016.06.004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia v.38 n.4 2016
reponame:Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular (ABHHTC)
instacron:ABHHTC
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular (ABHHTC)
instacron_str ABHHTC
institution ABHHTC
reponame_str Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia (Online)
collection Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular (ABHHTC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sbhh@terra.com.br||secretaria@rbhh.org
_version_ 1754213112846745600