Confidential donation confirmation as an alternative to confidential unit exclusion: 15 months experience of the HEMOMINAS foundation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-84842011000400009 |
Resumo: | BACKGROUND: Confidential unit exclusion remains a controversial strategy to reduce the residual risk of transfusion-transmitted infections. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze confidential unit exclusion from its development in a large institution in light of confidential donation confirmation. METHODS: Data of individuals who donated from October 1, 2008 to December 31, 2009 were analyzed in a case-control study. The serological results and sociodemographic characteristics of donors who did not confirm their donations were compared to those who did. Variables with p-values < 0.20 in univariate analysis were included in a logistic multivariate analysis. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis there was a statically significant association between positive serological results and response to confidential donation confirmation of "No". Donation type, (firsttime or return donor - OR 1.69, CI 1.37-2.09), gender (OR 1.66, CI 1.35-2.04), education level (OR 2.82, CI 2.30-3.47) and ethnic background (OR 0.67, CI 0.55-0.82) were included in the final logistic regression model. In all logistic regression models analyzed, the serological suitability and confidential donation confirmation were not found to be statistically associated. The adoption of new measures of clinical classification such as audiovisual touch-screen computer-assisted self-administered interviews might be more effective than confidential unit exclusion in the identification of donor risk behavior. The requirement that transfusion services continue to use confidential unit exclusion needs to be debated in countries where more specific and sensitive clinical and serological screening methods are available. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that there are not enough benefits to justify continued use of confidential donation confirmation in the analyzed institution. |
id |
ABHHTC-1_20ae4ea538a369c46d5c23831b820cfd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-84842011000400009 |
network_acronym_str |
ABHHTC-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Confidential donation confirmation as an alternative to confidential unit exclusion: 15 months experience of the HEMOMINAS foundationBlood donorsBlood-borne pathogensBlood banksEvaluation of the efficacy effectiveness of interventionsBACKGROUND: Confidential unit exclusion remains a controversial strategy to reduce the residual risk of transfusion-transmitted infections. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze confidential unit exclusion from its development in a large institution in light of confidential donation confirmation. METHODS: Data of individuals who donated from October 1, 2008 to December 31, 2009 were analyzed in a case-control study. The serological results and sociodemographic characteristics of donors who did not confirm their donations were compared to those who did. Variables with p-values < 0.20 in univariate analysis were included in a logistic multivariate analysis. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis there was a statically significant association between positive serological results and response to confidential donation confirmation of "No". Donation type, (firsttime or return donor - OR 1.69, CI 1.37-2.09), gender (OR 1.66, CI 1.35-2.04), education level (OR 2.82, CI 2.30-3.47) and ethnic background (OR 0.67, CI 0.55-0.82) were included in the final logistic regression model. In all logistic regression models analyzed, the serological suitability and confidential donation confirmation were not found to be statistically associated. The adoption of new measures of clinical classification such as audiovisual touch-screen computer-assisted self-administered interviews might be more effective than confidential unit exclusion in the identification of donor risk behavior. The requirement that transfusion services continue to use confidential unit exclusion needs to be debated in countries where more specific and sensitive clinical and serological screening methods are available. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that there are not enough benefits to justify continued use of confidential donation confirmation in the analyzed institution.Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-84842011000400009Revista Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia v.33 n.4 2011reponame:Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular (ABHHTC)instacron:ABHHTC10.5581/1516-8484.20110074info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLoureiro,Flávia Cristine MartineliDi Lorenzo Oliveira,CláudiaProietti,Anna Bárbara F. CarneiroProietti,Fernando Augustoeng2011-09-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-84842011000400009Revistahttp://www.rbhh.org/pt/archivo/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpsbhh@terra.com.br||secretaria@rbhh.org1806-08701516-8484opendoar:2011-09-20T00:00Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular (ABHHTC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Confidential donation confirmation as an alternative to confidential unit exclusion: 15 months experience of the HEMOMINAS foundation |
title |
Confidential donation confirmation as an alternative to confidential unit exclusion: 15 months experience of the HEMOMINAS foundation |
spellingShingle |
Confidential donation confirmation as an alternative to confidential unit exclusion: 15 months experience of the HEMOMINAS foundation Loureiro,Flávia Cristine Martineli Blood donors Blood-borne pathogens Blood banks Evaluation of the efficacy effectiveness of interventions |
title_short |
Confidential donation confirmation as an alternative to confidential unit exclusion: 15 months experience of the HEMOMINAS foundation |
title_full |
Confidential donation confirmation as an alternative to confidential unit exclusion: 15 months experience of the HEMOMINAS foundation |
title_fullStr |
Confidential donation confirmation as an alternative to confidential unit exclusion: 15 months experience of the HEMOMINAS foundation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Confidential donation confirmation as an alternative to confidential unit exclusion: 15 months experience of the HEMOMINAS foundation |
title_sort |
Confidential donation confirmation as an alternative to confidential unit exclusion: 15 months experience of the HEMOMINAS foundation |
author |
Loureiro,Flávia Cristine Martineli |
author_facet |
Loureiro,Flávia Cristine Martineli Di Lorenzo Oliveira,Cláudia Proietti,Anna Bárbara F. Carneiro Proietti,Fernando Augusto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Di Lorenzo Oliveira,Cláudia Proietti,Anna Bárbara F. Carneiro Proietti,Fernando Augusto |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Loureiro,Flávia Cristine Martineli Di Lorenzo Oliveira,Cláudia Proietti,Anna Bárbara F. Carneiro Proietti,Fernando Augusto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Blood donors Blood-borne pathogens Blood banks Evaluation of the efficacy effectiveness of interventions |
topic |
Blood donors Blood-borne pathogens Blood banks Evaluation of the efficacy effectiveness of interventions |
description |
BACKGROUND: Confidential unit exclusion remains a controversial strategy to reduce the residual risk of transfusion-transmitted infections. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze confidential unit exclusion from its development in a large institution in light of confidential donation confirmation. METHODS: Data of individuals who donated from October 1, 2008 to December 31, 2009 were analyzed in a case-control study. The serological results and sociodemographic characteristics of donors who did not confirm their donations were compared to those who did. Variables with p-values < 0.20 in univariate analysis were included in a logistic multivariate analysis. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis there was a statically significant association between positive serological results and response to confidential donation confirmation of "No". Donation type, (firsttime or return donor - OR 1.69, CI 1.37-2.09), gender (OR 1.66, CI 1.35-2.04), education level (OR 2.82, CI 2.30-3.47) and ethnic background (OR 0.67, CI 0.55-0.82) were included in the final logistic regression model. In all logistic regression models analyzed, the serological suitability and confidential donation confirmation were not found to be statistically associated. The adoption of new measures of clinical classification such as audiovisual touch-screen computer-assisted self-administered interviews might be more effective than confidential unit exclusion in the identification of donor risk behavior. The requirement that transfusion services continue to use confidential unit exclusion needs to be debated in countries where more specific and sensitive clinical and serological screening methods are available. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that there are not enough benefits to justify continued use of confidential donation confirmation in the analyzed institution. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-84842011000400009 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-84842011000400009 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5581/1516-8484.20110074 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia v.33 n.4 2011 reponame:Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia (Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular (ABHHTC) instacron:ABHHTC |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular (ABHHTC) |
instacron_str |
ABHHTC |
institution |
ABHHTC |
reponame_str |
Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia (Online) |
collection |
Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular (ABHHTC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
sbhh@terra.com.br||secretaria@rbhh.org |
_version_ |
1754213111481499648 |