Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vasconcelos,Márlon de Castro
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Melo,Adriano Sanches, Schwarzbold,Albano
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-975X2013000400006
Resumo: AIM: We evaluated five stream classification systems observing: 1) differences in richness, abundance and macroinvertebrates communities among stream classes within classification systems; and 2) whether classification systems present better performance using macroinvertebrates. Additionally, we evaluated the effects of taxonomic resolution and data type (abundance and presence) on results. METHODS: Five stream classification systems were used, two based on hydroregions, one based on ecoregions by FEOW, a fourth one based on stream orders and the last one based on clusters of environment variables sampled in 37 streams at Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil. We used a randomization test to evaluate differences of richness and abundance, a db-MANOVA to evaluate the differences of species assemblages and Classification Strength (CS) to evaluate the classifications performance. RESULTS: There were differences of richness and abundance among stream classes within each stream classification. The same result was found for community data, except for stream order classifications in family level. We observed that stream classes obtained for each stream classification differed in terms of environment variables (db-MANOVA). The classification based on environment variables showed higher CS values than other classification systems. The taxonomic resolution was important to the observed results. Data on genera level presented CS values 12% higher than family level for cluster classification, and the data type was dependent on the classification system and taxonomic resolution employed. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that classifications based on cluster of environment variables was better than other stream classification systems, and similar results using genera level can be obtained for management programs using family resolution in a geographical context similar to this study.
id ABL-1_cd85302d93c3a9995944174830126609
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2179-975X2013000400006
network_acronym_str ABL-1
network_name_str Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebratesenvironment classificationclassification strengthMRPPhydroregionstropical environmentAIM: We evaluated five stream classification systems observing: 1) differences in richness, abundance and macroinvertebrates communities among stream classes within classification systems; and 2) whether classification systems present better performance using macroinvertebrates. Additionally, we evaluated the effects of taxonomic resolution and data type (abundance and presence) on results. METHODS: Five stream classification systems were used, two based on hydroregions, one based on ecoregions by FEOW, a fourth one based on stream orders and the last one based on clusters of environment variables sampled in 37 streams at Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil. We used a randomization test to evaluate differences of richness and abundance, a db-MANOVA to evaluate the differences of species assemblages and Classification Strength (CS) to evaluate the classifications performance. RESULTS: There were differences of richness and abundance among stream classes within each stream classification. The same result was found for community data, except for stream order classifications in family level. We observed that stream classes obtained for each stream classification differed in terms of environment variables (db-MANOVA). The classification based on environment variables showed higher CS values than other classification systems. The taxonomic resolution was important to the observed results. Data on genera level presented CS values 12% higher than family level for cluster classification, and the data type was dependent on the classification system and taxonomic resolution employed. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that classifications based on cluster of environment variables was better than other stream classification systems, and similar results using genera level can be obtained for management programs using family resolution in a geographical context similar to this study.Associação Brasileira de Limnologia2013-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-975X2013000400006Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia v.25 n.4 2013reponame:Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Limnologia (ABL)instacron:ABL10.1590/S2179-975X2013000400006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVasconcelos,Márlon de CastroMelo,Adriano SanchesSchwarzbold,Albanoeng2015-07-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2179-975X2013000400006Revistahttp://www.ablimno.org.br/publiActa.phphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||actalb@rc.unesp.br2179-975X0102-6712opendoar:2015-07-02T00:00Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Limnologia (ABL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates
title Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates
spellingShingle Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates
Vasconcelos,Márlon de Castro
environment classification
classification strength
MRPP
hydroregions
tropical environment
title_short Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates
title_full Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates
title_fullStr Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates
title_sort Comparing the performance of different stream classification systems using aquatic macroinvertebrates
author Vasconcelos,Márlon de Castro
author_facet Vasconcelos,Márlon de Castro
Melo,Adriano Sanches
Schwarzbold,Albano
author_role author
author2 Melo,Adriano Sanches
Schwarzbold,Albano
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vasconcelos,Márlon de Castro
Melo,Adriano Sanches
Schwarzbold,Albano
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv environment classification
classification strength
MRPP
hydroregions
tropical environment
topic environment classification
classification strength
MRPP
hydroregions
tropical environment
description AIM: We evaluated five stream classification systems observing: 1) differences in richness, abundance and macroinvertebrates communities among stream classes within classification systems; and 2) whether classification systems present better performance using macroinvertebrates. Additionally, we evaluated the effects of taxonomic resolution and data type (abundance and presence) on results. METHODS: Five stream classification systems were used, two based on hydroregions, one based on ecoregions by FEOW, a fourth one based on stream orders and the last one based on clusters of environment variables sampled in 37 streams at Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil. We used a randomization test to evaluate differences of richness and abundance, a db-MANOVA to evaluate the differences of species assemblages and Classification Strength (CS) to evaluate the classifications performance. RESULTS: There were differences of richness and abundance among stream classes within each stream classification. The same result was found for community data, except for stream order classifications in family level. We observed that stream classes obtained for each stream classification differed in terms of environment variables (db-MANOVA). The classification based on environment variables showed higher CS values than other classification systems. The taxonomic resolution was important to the observed results. Data on genera level presented CS values 12% higher than family level for cluster classification, and the data type was dependent on the classification system and taxonomic resolution employed. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that classifications based on cluster of environment variables was better than other stream classification systems, and similar results using genera level can be obtained for management programs using family resolution in a geographical context similar to this study.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-975X2013000400006
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-975X2013000400006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S2179-975X2013000400006
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Limnologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Limnologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia v.25 n.4 2013
reponame:Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Limnologia (ABL)
instacron:ABL
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Limnologia (ABL)
instacron_str ABL
institution ABL
reponame_str Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (Online)
collection Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Limnologia (ABL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||actalb@rc.unesp.br
_version_ 1754212636380102656