Relative condition factor: Le Cren's legacy for fisheries science

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gubiani,Éder André
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Ruaro,Renata, Ribeiro,Vinícius Ricardo, Fé,Úrsula Morgana Gomes de Santa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-975X2020000100501
Resumo: Abstract: Aim In this paper we present a scientometric analysis aimed at to assess and quantify the contribution of Le Cren’s condition factor and the main ideas advanced by ‘Le Cren, 1951’ to studies on the health of individuals or populations in aquatic environments. Specifically, we addressed the following questions: (i) what are the temporal and spatial citation trends of ‘Le Cren, 1951’?; (ii) Which journals cited ‘Le Cren, 1951’ most frequently?; (iii) In which types of aquatic environments and organisms have Le Cren’s condition factor been most commonly applied?; (iv) Which of the main applications addressed in ‘Le Cren, 1951’ have been most frequently used by fisheries scientists?; (v) Which of the methods (i.e., Quételet’s index or body mass index, Fulton’s condition factor, Le Cren’s condition factor, relative weight, residual index and scaled mass index) used to estimate condition factor identified in the papers that cited ‘Le Cren, 1951’ have been most frequently used? In addition, the main criticisms of the use of the relative condition factor are discussed. Methods We carried out a scientometric analysis on the papers published from 1951 to December 2015 that cited Le Cren’s article. The papers were obtained from the Thomson Reuters database (ISI Web of Knowledge, apps.isiknowledge.com) in May 2016. Results In total, 1128 papers were assessed. The number of citations increased significantly over time. Most citations occurred in two journals (Journal of Fish Biology and Journal of Applied Ichthyology). Most of papers were carried out in marine environments. In addition, we show that Le Cren's paper has been cited mainly in articles that estimate the condition factor or the weight-length relationship of populations. Finally, we emphasize that the relative condition factor proposed by Le Cren in 1951 is still the main method used to estimate the body condition of an individual or population. Conclusions Le Cren's significant contribution to animal well-being is undeniable, and we emphasize that among the methods identified in the papers that cited ‘Le Cren, 1951’ that estimated body condition, the relative condition factor proposed by Le Cren in 1951 is still the most commonly used method.
id ABL-1_f30509ddd68d79a9ec70d794d1c57116
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2179-975X2020000100501
network_acronym_str ABL-1
network_name_str Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Relative condition factor: Le Cren's legacy for fisheries scienceEric D. Le Crenbody conditioncondition indiceslength-weight relationshipaquatic ecosystemsAbstract: Aim In this paper we present a scientometric analysis aimed at to assess and quantify the contribution of Le Cren’s condition factor and the main ideas advanced by ‘Le Cren, 1951’ to studies on the health of individuals or populations in aquatic environments. Specifically, we addressed the following questions: (i) what are the temporal and spatial citation trends of ‘Le Cren, 1951’?; (ii) Which journals cited ‘Le Cren, 1951’ most frequently?; (iii) In which types of aquatic environments and organisms have Le Cren’s condition factor been most commonly applied?; (iv) Which of the main applications addressed in ‘Le Cren, 1951’ have been most frequently used by fisheries scientists?; (v) Which of the methods (i.e., Quételet’s index or body mass index, Fulton’s condition factor, Le Cren’s condition factor, relative weight, residual index and scaled mass index) used to estimate condition factor identified in the papers that cited ‘Le Cren, 1951’ have been most frequently used? In addition, the main criticisms of the use of the relative condition factor are discussed. Methods We carried out a scientometric analysis on the papers published from 1951 to December 2015 that cited Le Cren’s article. The papers were obtained from the Thomson Reuters database (ISI Web of Knowledge, apps.isiknowledge.com) in May 2016. Results In total, 1128 papers were assessed. The number of citations increased significantly over time. Most citations occurred in two journals (Journal of Fish Biology and Journal of Applied Ichthyology). Most of papers were carried out in marine environments. In addition, we show that Le Cren's paper has been cited mainly in articles that estimate the condition factor or the weight-length relationship of populations. Finally, we emphasize that the relative condition factor proposed by Le Cren in 1951 is still the main method used to estimate the body condition of an individual or population. Conclusions Le Cren's significant contribution to animal well-being is undeniable, and we emphasize that among the methods identified in the papers that cited ‘Le Cren, 1951’ that estimated body condition, the relative condition factor proposed by Le Cren in 1951 is still the most commonly used method.Associação Brasileira de Limnologia2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-975X2020000100501Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia v.32 2020reponame:Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Limnologia (ABL)instacron:ABL10.1590/s2179-975x13017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGubiani,Éder AndréRuaro,RenataRibeiro,Vinícius RicardoFé,Úrsula Morgana Gomes de Santaeng2020-02-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2179-975X2020000100501Revistahttp://www.ablimno.org.br/publiActa.phphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||actalb@rc.unesp.br2179-975X0102-6712opendoar:2020-02-06T00:00Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Limnologia (ABL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Relative condition factor: Le Cren's legacy for fisheries science
title Relative condition factor: Le Cren's legacy for fisheries science
spellingShingle Relative condition factor: Le Cren's legacy for fisheries science
Gubiani,Éder André
Eric D. Le Cren
body condition
condition indices
length-weight relationship
aquatic ecosystems
title_short Relative condition factor: Le Cren's legacy for fisheries science
title_full Relative condition factor: Le Cren's legacy for fisheries science
title_fullStr Relative condition factor: Le Cren's legacy for fisheries science
title_full_unstemmed Relative condition factor: Le Cren's legacy for fisheries science
title_sort Relative condition factor: Le Cren's legacy for fisheries science
author Gubiani,Éder André
author_facet Gubiani,Éder André
Ruaro,Renata
Ribeiro,Vinícius Ricardo
Fé,Úrsula Morgana Gomes de Santa
author_role author
author2 Ruaro,Renata
Ribeiro,Vinícius Ricardo
Fé,Úrsula Morgana Gomes de Santa
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gubiani,Éder André
Ruaro,Renata
Ribeiro,Vinícius Ricardo
Fé,Úrsula Morgana Gomes de Santa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Eric D. Le Cren
body condition
condition indices
length-weight relationship
aquatic ecosystems
topic Eric D. Le Cren
body condition
condition indices
length-weight relationship
aquatic ecosystems
description Abstract: Aim In this paper we present a scientometric analysis aimed at to assess and quantify the contribution of Le Cren’s condition factor and the main ideas advanced by ‘Le Cren, 1951’ to studies on the health of individuals or populations in aquatic environments. Specifically, we addressed the following questions: (i) what are the temporal and spatial citation trends of ‘Le Cren, 1951’?; (ii) Which journals cited ‘Le Cren, 1951’ most frequently?; (iii) In which types of aquatic environments and organisms have Le Cren’s condition factor been most commonly applied?; (iv) Which of the main applications addressed in ‘Le Cren, 1951’ have been most frequently used by fisheries scientists?; (v) Which of the methods (i.e., Quételet’s index or body mass index, Fulton’s condition factor, Le Cren’s condition factor, relative weight, residual index and scaled mass index) used to estimate condition factor identified in the papers that cited ‘Le Cren, 1951’ have been most frequently used? In addition, the main criticisms of the use of the relative condition factor are discussed. Methods We carried out a scientometric analysis on the papers published from 1951 to December 2015 that cited Le Cren’s article. The papers were obtained from the Thomson Reuters database (ISI Web of Knowledge, apps.isiknowledge.com) in May 2016. Results In total, 1128 papers were assessed. The number of citations increased significantly over time. Most citations occurred in two journals (Journal of Fish Biology and Journal of Applied Ichthyology). Most of papers were carried out in marine environments. In addition, we show that Le Cren's paper has been cited mainly in articles that estimate the condition factor or the weight-length relationship of populations. Finally, we emphasize that the relative condition factor proposed by Le Cren in 1951 is still the main method used to estimate the body condition of an individual or population. Conclusions Le Cren's significant contribution to animal well-being is undeniable, and we emphasize that among the methods identified in the papers that cited ‘Le Cren, 1951’ that estimated body condition, the relative condition factor proposed by Le Cren in 1951 is still the most commonly used method.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-975X2020000100501
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-975X2020000100501
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s2179-975x13017
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Limnologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Limnologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia v.32 2020
reponame:Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Limnologia (ABL)
instacron:ABL
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Limnologia (ABL)
instacron_str ABL
institution ABL
reponame_str Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (Online)
collection Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Limnologia (ABL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||actalb@rc.unesp.br
_version_ 1754212637733814272