Microtensile bond strength of current adhesive systems when compared to cohesive strength of sound dentin and a resin-based composite

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cardoso,Paulo Eduardo Capel
Data de Publicação: 2004
Outros Autores: Sadek,Fernanda Tranchesi, Placido,Eliane, Santos,José Fortunato Ferreira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Materials research (São Carlos. Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392004000400011
Resumo: Purpose: To evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) to dentin of 4 adhesive systems, the micromorphology of the adhesive/dentin interface and to compare the results to the µTS (cohesive strength) of sound dentin and resin composite. Occlusal surfaces of 24 extracted caries-free human molars were cut flat to expose the dentin surface. They were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n = 6): Adper Scotchbond Multi Purpose Plus (MP), Adper Single Bond (SB), Clearfil Protect Bond (CP) and Adper Prompt (AP). Adhesive systems were applied and "crowns" were built using Z100. Other 5 human molars were sectioned to obtain square-shaped dentin blocks and 5 resin blocks were built using a composite resin, Z100. After storage in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h, stick-shaped specimens were obtained for all groups (n = 5) with 0.8 mm² and subjected to µTBS or µTS test. Results were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA and Tukey's test at p < 0.05. The remaining bonded teeth were cut in two halves perpendicularly to the bonded interface and prepared for SEM analyses. No significant differences were found among CP (45.6 + 7.4 MPa), SB (43.3 + 6.5 MPa) and MP (35.1 + 5.9 MPa) (p > 0.05). The lowest result was found for AP (27.4 + 4.7 MPa), although not statistically different from MP. Most specimens (89.4%) showed predominant adhesive failure. None of the systems tested reached the µTS values of dentin (108.5 + 9.4 MPa) and Z100 (86.5 + 3.6 MPa). Bonded interfaces showed lower µTBS than those µTS of dentin and resin composite blocks. The all-in-one self-etching adhesive had the lowest µTBS.
id ABMABCABPOL-1_3813e7418a19f16c37c08b024c80e6cc
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-14392004000400011
network_acronym_str ABMABCABPOL-1
network_name_str Materials research (São Carlos. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Microtensile bond strength of current adhesive systems when compared to cohesive strength of sound dentin and a resin-based compositebond strengthcohesive strengthresindentinPurpose: To evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) to dentin of 4 adhesive systems, the micromorphology of the adhesive/dentin interface and to compare the results to the µTS (cohesive strength) of sound dentin and resin composite. Occlusal surfaces of 24 extracted caries-free human molars were cut flat to expose the dentin surface. They were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n = 6): Adper Scotchbond Multi Purpose Plus (MP), Adper Single Bond (SB), Clearfil Protect Bond (CP) and Adper Prompt (AP). Adhesive systems were applied and "crowns" were built using Z100. Other 5 human molars were sectioned to obtain square-shaped dentin blocks and 5 resin blocks were built using a composite resin, Z100. After storage in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h, stick-shaped specimens were obtained for all groups (n = 5) with 0.8 mm² and subjected to µTBS or µTS test. Results were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA and Tukey's test at p < 0.05. The remaining bonded teeth were cut in two halves perpendicularly to the bonded interface and prepared for SEM analyses. No significant differences were found among CP (45.6 + 7.4 MPa), SB (43.3 + 6.5 MPa) and MP (35.1 + 5.9 MPa) (p > 0.05). The lowest result was found for AP (27.4 + 4.7 MPa), although not statistically different from MP. Most specimens (89.4%) showed predominant adhesive failure. None of the systems tested reached the µTS values of dentin (108.5 + 9.4 MPa) and Z100 (86.5 + 3.6 MPa). Bonded interfaces showed lower µTBS than those µTS of dentin and resin composite blocks. The all-in-one self-etching adhesive had the lowest µTBS.ABM, ABC, ABPol2004-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392004000400011Materials Research v.7 n.4 2004reponame:Materials research (São Carlos. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:ABM ABC ABPOL10.1590/S1516-14392004000400011info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCardoso,Paulo Eduardo CapelSadek,Fernanda TranchesiPlacido,ElianeSantos,José Fortunato Ferreiraeng2005-11-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-14392004000400011Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/mrPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpdedz@power.ufscar.br1980-53731516-1439opendoar:2005-11-08T00:00Materials research (São Carlos. Online) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Microtensile bond strength of current adhesive systems when compared to cohesive strength of sound dentin and a resin-based composite
title Microtensile bond strength of current adhesive systems when compared to cohesive strength of sound dentin and a resin-based composite
spellingShingle Microtensile bond strength of current adhesive systems when compared to cohesive strength of sound dentin and a resin-based composite
Cardoso,Paulo Eduardo Capel
bond strength
cohesive strength
resin
dentin
title_short Microtensile bond strength of current adhesive systems when compared to cohesive strength of sound dentin and a resin-based composite
title_full Microtensile bond strength of current adhesive systems when compared to cohesive strength of sound dentin and a resin-based composite
title_fullStr Microtensile bond strength of current adhesive systems when compared to cohesive strength of sound dentin and a resin-based composite
title_full_unstemmed Microtensile bond strength of current adhesive systems when compared to cohesive strength of sound dentin and a resin-based composite
title_sort Microtensile bond strength of current adhesive systems when compared to cohesive strength of sound dentin and a resin-based composite
author Cardoso,Paulo Eduardo Capel
author_facet Cardoso,Paulo Eduardo Capel
Sadek,Fernanda Tranchesi
Placido,Eliane
Santos,José Fortunato Ferreira
author_role author
author2 Sadek,Fernanda Tranchesi
Placido,Eliane
Santos,José Fortunato Ferreira
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cardoso,Paulo Eduardo Capel
Sadek,Fernanda Tranchesi
Placido,Eliane
Santos,José Fortunato Ferreira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv bond strength
cohesive strength
resin
dentin
topic bond strength
cohesive strength
resin
dentin
description Purpose: To evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) to dentin of 4 adhesive systems, the micromorphology of the adhesive/dentin interface and to compare the results to the µTS (cohesive strength) of sound dentin and resin composite. Occlusal surfaces of 24 extracted caries-free human molars were cut flat to expose the dentin surface. They were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n = 6): Adper Scotchbond Multi Purpose Plus (MP), Adper Single Bond (SB), Clearfil Protect Bond (CP) and Adper Prompt (AP). Adhesive systems were applied and "crowns" were built using Z100. Other 5 human molars were sectioned to obtain square-shaped dentin blocks and 5 resin blocks were built using a composite resin, Z100. After storage in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h, stick-shaped specimens were obtained for all groups (n = 5) with 0.8 mm² and subjected to µTBS or µTS test. Results were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA and Tukey's test at p < 0.05. The remaining bonded teeth were cut in two halves perpendicularly to the bonded interface and prepared for SEM analyses. No significant differences were found among CP (45.6 + 7.4 MPa), SB (43.3 + 6.5 MPa) and MP (35.1 + 5.9 MPa) (p > 0.05). The lowest result was found for AP (27.4 + 4.7 MPa), although not statistically different from MP. Most specimens (89.4%) showed predominant adhesive failure. None of the systems tested reached the µTS values of dentin (108.5 + 9.4 MPa) and Z100 (86.5 + 3.6 MPa). Bonded interfaces showed lower µTBS than those µTS of dentin and resin composite blocks. The all-in-one self-etching adhesive had the lowest µTBS.
publishDate 2004
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2004-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392004000400011
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392004000400011
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1516-14392004000400011
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABM, ABC, ABPol
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABM, ABC, ABPol
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Materials Research v.7 n.4 2004
reponame:Materials research (São Carlos. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron:ABM ABC ABPOL
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron_str ABM ABC ABPOL
institution ABM ABC ABPOL
reponame_str Materials research (São Carlos. Online)
collection Materials research (São Carlos. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Materials research (São Carlos. Online) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dedz@power.ufscar.br
_version_ 1754212657768955904