Chemical and topographic analysis of treated surfaces of five different commercial dental titanium implants
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Materials research (São Carlos. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392012000300007 |
Resumo: | We present a detailed investigation of the surface characteristics of five commercial titanium implants with different surface finishing (double acid etching, anodization and incorporation of Ca/P, acid etching and deposition of Ca/P, hydroxyapatite-blasting, acid etching and Ca/P-blasting) produced by five different manufacturers. A set of experimental techniques were employed to study the surface chemical composition and morphology: XPS, XRD, SEM, EDS, and AFM. According to the implat manufacturers, the addition of Ca and P at the implant surface is a main feature of these implants (except the double acid etched implant, which was included for comparative purpose). However, the results showed a great discrepancy on the final amount of these elements on the implant surface, which suggests a different effectiveness of the employed surface finishing methods to fix those elements on the implant surface. Our results show that only the method used by the manufacturer of hydroxyapatite-blasting surface finished implants was efficient to produce a hydroxyapatite coating. This group also showed the highest roughness parameters. |
id |
ABMABCABPOL-1_488ab0cc1074c36b71e7460f04e32dd8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-14392012000300007 |
network_acronym_str |
ABMABCABPOL-1 |
network_name_str |
Materials research (São Carlos. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Chemical and topographic analysis of treated surfaces of five different commercial dental titanium implantsdental implantssurface modificationchemical analysistitaniumWe present a detailed investigation of the surface characteristics of five commercial titanium implants with different surface finishing (double acid etching, anodization and incorporation of Ca/P, acid etching and deposition of Ca/P, hydroxyapatite-blasting, acid etching and Ca/P-blasting) produced by five different manufacturers. A set of experimental techniques were employed to study the surface chemical composition and morphology: XPS, XRD, SEM, EDS, and AFM. According to the implat manufacturers, the addition of Ca and P at the implant surface is a main feature of these implants (except the double acid etched implant, which was included for comparative purpose). However, the results showed a great discrepancy on the final amount of these elements on the implant surface, which suggests a different effectiveness of the employed surface finishing methods to fix those elements on the implant surface. Our results show that only the method used by the manufacturer of hydroxyapatite-blasting surface finished implants was efficient to produce a hydroxyapatite coating. This group also showed the highest roughness parameters.ABM, ABC, ABPol2012-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392012000300007Materials Research v.15 n.3 2012reponame:Materials research (São Carlos. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:ABM ABC ABPOL10.1590/S1516-14392012005000035info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessChrcanovic,Bruno RamosPedrosa,Alexsander RibeiroMartins,Maximiliano Delanyeng2012-06-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-14392012000300007Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/mrPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpdedz@power.ufscar.br1980-53731516-1439opendoar:2012-06-20T00:00Materials research (São Carlos. Online) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Chemical and topographic analysis of treated surfaces of five different commercial dental titanium implants |
title |
Chemical and topographic analysis of treated surfaces of five different commercial dental titanium implants |
spellingShingle |
Chemical and topographic analysis of treated surfaces of five different commercial dental titanium implants Chrcanovic,Bruno Ramos dental implants surface modification chemical analysis titanium |
title_short |
Chemical and topographic analysis of treated surfaces of five different commercial dental titanium implants |
title_full |
Chemical and topographic analysis of treated surfaces of five different commercial dental titanium implants |
title_fullStr |
Chemical and topographic analysis of treated surfaces of five different commercial dental titanium implants |
title_full_unstemmed |
Chemical and topographic analysis of treated surfaces of five different commercial dental titanium implants |
title_sort |
Chemical and topographic analysis of treated surfaces of five different commercial dental titanium implants |
author |
Chrcanovic,Bruno Ramos |
author_facet |
Chrcanovic,Bruno Ramos Pedrosa,Alexsander Ribeiro Martins,Maximiliano Delany |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pedrosa,Alexsander Ribeiro Martins,Maximiliano Delany |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Chrcanovic,Bruno Ramos Pedrosa,Alexsander Ribeiro Martins,Maximiliano Delany |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
dental implants surface modification chemical analysis titanium |
topic |
dental implants surface modification chemical analysis titanium |
description |
We present a detailed investigation of the surface characteristics of five commercial titanium implants with different surface finishing (double acid etching, anodization and incorporation of Ca/P, acid etching and deposition of Ca/P, hydroxyapatite-blasting, acid etching and Ca/P-blasting) produced by five different manufacturers. A set of experimental techniques were employed to study the surface chemical composition and morphology: XPS, XRD, SEM, EDS, and AFM. According to the implat manufacturers, the addition of Ca and P at the implant surface is a main feature of these implants (except the double acid etched implant, which was included for comparative purpose). However, the results showed a great discrepancy on the final amount of these elements on the implant surface, which suggests a different effectiveness of the employed surface finishing methods to fix those elements on the implant surface. Our results show that only the method used by the manufacturer of hydroxyapatite-blasting surface finished implants was efficient to produce a hydroxyapatite coating. This group also showed the highest roughness parameters. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392012000300007 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392012000300007 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1516-14392012005000035 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABM, ABC, ABPol |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABM, ABC, ABPol |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Materials Research v.15 n.3 2012 reponame:Materials research (São Carlos. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) instacron:ABM ABC ABPOL |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
instacron_str |
ABM ABC ABPOL |
institution |
ABM ABC ABPOL |
reponame_str |
Materials research (São Carlos. Online) |
collection |
Materials research (São Carlos. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Materials research (São Carlos. Online) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dedz@power.ufscar.br |
_version_ |
1754212661285879808 |