PM versus IM Ti-5Al-5V-5Mo-3Cr Alloy in Mechanical Properties and Fracture Behaviour

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zhao,Qinyang
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Yang,Fei, Torrens,Rob, Bolzoni,Leandro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Materials research (São Carlos. Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392019000800207
Resumo: The comparisons of mechanical properties and fracture behaviour between as-consolidated PM Ti-5553 alloy and as-cast IM Ti-5553 alloy were investigated through tensile, fracture toughness and impact toughness tests in this research. The slightly higher strength but much higher ductility and toughness can be identified in IM alloy specimens, which is also confirmed by the fracture behaviour of the specimens after mechanical tests. IM alloy specimens always exhibit the ductile dimple fracture mechanism in the different tests, while the fracture mechanism of PM alloy specimens indicates a high loading rate sensitivity, changing from the mixed ductile-brittle quasi-cleavage fracture into the brittle cleavage fracture mechanism accompanied by the remarkable decrease of impact toughness. The relatively low mechanical properties, especially the ductility and the brittle fracture behaviour of as-consolidated PM Ti-5553 alloy, are mainly explained by the differences in the initial microstructures between these two alloys.
id ABMABCABPOL-1_5d26a1019fe20288fd5e9826ee8d11f4
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-14392019000800207
network_acronym_str ABMABCABPOL-1
network_name_str Materials research (São Carlos. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling PM versus IM Ti-5Al-5V-5Mo-3Cr Alloy in Mechanical Properties and Fracture BehaviourPowder metallurgyTi-5553 alloyMechanical propertyFracture behaviourThe comparisons of mechanical properties and fracture behaviour between as-consolidated PM Ti-5553 alloy and as-cast IM Ti-5553 alloy were investigated through tensile, fracture toughness and impact toughness tests in this research. The slightly higher strength but much higher ductility and toughness can be identified in IM alloy specimens, which is also confirmed by the fracture behaviour of the specimens after mechanical tests. IM alloy specimens always exhibit the ductile dimple fracture mechanism in the different tests, while the fracture mechanism of PM alloy specimens indicates a high loading rate sensitivity, changing from the mixed ductile-brittle quasi-cleavage fracture into the brittle cleavage fracture mechanism accompanied by the remarkable decrease of impact toughness. The relatively low mechanical properties, especially the ductility and the brittle fracture behaviour of as-consolidated PM Ti-5553 alloy, are mainly explained by the differences in the initial microstructures between these two alloys.ABM, ABC, ABPol2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392019000800207Materials Research v.22 suppl.2 2019reponame:Materials research (São Carlos. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:ABM ABC ABPOL10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2018-0739info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZhao,QinyangYang,FeiTorrens,RobBolzoni,Leandroeng2019-06-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-14392019000800207Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/mrPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpdedz@power.ufscar.br1980-53731516-1439opendoar:2019-06-25T00:00Materials research (São Carlos. Online) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv PM versus IM Ti-5Al-5V-5Mo-3Cr Alloy in Mechanical Properties and Fracture Behaviour
title PM versus IM Ti-5Al-5V-5Mo-3Cr Alloy in Mechanical Properties and Fracture Behaviour
spellingShingle PM versus IM Ti-5Al-5V-5Mo-3Cr Alloy in Mechanical Properties and Fracture Behaviour
Zhao,Qinyang
Powder metallurgy
Ti-5553 alloy
Mechanical property
Fracture behaviour
title_short PM versus IM Ti-5Al-5V-5Mo-3Cr Alloy in Mechanical Properties and Fracture Behaviour
title_full PM versus IM Ti-5Al-5V-5Mo-3Cr Alloy in Mechanical Properties and Fracture Behaviour
title_fullStr PM versus IM Ti-5Al-5V-5Mo-3Cr Alloy in Mechanical Properties and Fracture Behaviour
title_full_unstemmed PM versus IM Ti-5Al-5V-5Mo-3Cr Alloy in Mechanical Properties and Fracture Behaviour
title_sort PM versus IM Ti-5Al-5V-5Mo-3Cr Alloy in Mechanical Properties and Fracture Behaviour
author Zhao,Qinyang
author_facet Zhao,Qinyang
Yang,Fei
Torrens,Rob
Bolzoni,Leandro
author_role author
author2 Yang,Fei
Torrens,Rob
Bolzoni,Leandro
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zhao,Qinyang
Yang,Fei
Torrens,Rob
Bolzoni,Leandro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Powder metallurgy
Ti-5553 alloy
Mechanical property
Fracture behaviour
topic Powder metallurgy
Ti-5553 alloy
Mechanical property
Fracture behaviour
description The comparisons of mechanical properties and fracture behaviour between as-consolidated PM Ti-5553 alloy and as-cast IM Ti-5553 alloy were investigated through tensile, fracture toughness and impact toughness tests in this research. The slightly higher strength but much higher ductility and toughness can be identified in IM alloy specimens, which is also confirmed by the fracture behaviour of the specimens after mechanical tests. IM alloy specimens always exhibit the ductile dimple fracture mechanism in the different tests, while the fracture mechanism of PM alloy specimens indicates a high loading rate sensitivity, changing from the mixed ductile-brittle quasi-cleavage fracture into the brittle cleavage fracture mechanism accompanied by the remarkable decrease of impact toughness. The relatively low mechanical properties, especially the ductility and the brittle fracture behaviour of as-consolidated PM Ti-5553 alloy, are mainly explained by the differences in the initial microstructures between these two alloys.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392019000800207
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392019000800207
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2018-0739
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABM, ABC, ABPol
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABM, ABC, ABPol
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Materials Research v.22 suppl.2 2019
reponame:Materials research (São Carlos. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron:ABM ABC ABPOL
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron_str ABM ABC ABPOL
institution ABM ABC ABPOL
reponame_str Materials research (São Carlos. Online)
collection Materials research (São Carlos. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Materials research (São Carlos. Online) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dedz@power.ufscar.br
_version_ 1754212676324556800

Registros relacionados