Evaluación de la dureza superficial en amalgamas en función de tipos de aleaciones, momentos y tipos de pulimentos

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ramos,Juliana Panazzolo
Data de Publicação: 2003
Outros Autores: Benitez Catirse,Alma Blásida Concepción Elizaur, Corona,Silmara Aparecida Milori
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Materials research (São Carlos. Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392003000300020
Resumo: The aim of this study was to analyze in vitro surface hardness (micro-indentation tester Wolpert) of different types of amalgam alloys varying the technique and polishing time. Tested were the amalgam: Velvalloy, Permite e Dispersalloy. For each material, 2 polishing techniques were accomplished: T1 (bladed finishing burs + abrasive rubber points + pumice-water slurry in Robinson polishing brush) and; T2 (abrasive rubber points + pumice-water slurry in Robinson polishing brush), at 2 periods of time: P1 (immediately - 15 min after condensation) and P2 (after 24 h). For each experimental condition, 5 samples were prepared. For each sample, 2 indentations were taken and the average was determined. Were made analysis using ANOVA and Tukey test. Were concluded that: a) using the Permite alloy with polishing after 24 h the surface hardness of restoration will be higher; b) the technique T2 enhances the hardness of dental amalgams and c) alloy Permite with polished immediately were statisticaly equal than Velvalloy polished after 24 h.
id ABMABCABPOL-1_6570630128ebf6d70221b8e61c1db451
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-14392003000300020
network_acronym_str ABMABCABPOL-1
network_name_str Materials research (São Carlos. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluación de la dureza superficial en amalgamas en función de tipos de aleaciones, momentos y tipos de pulimentosamalgamsurface hardnesspolishingrepolishingThe aim of this study was to analyze in vitro surface hardness (micro-indentation tester Wolpert) of different types of amalgam alloys varying the technique and polishing time. Tested were the amalgam: Velvalloy, Permite e Dispersalloy. For each material, 2 polishing techniques were accomplished: T1 (bladed finishing burs + abrasive rubber points + pumice-water slurry in Robinson polishing brush) and; T2 (abrasive rubber points + pumice-water slurry in Robinson polishing brush), at 2 periods of time: P1 (immediately - 15 min after condensation) and P2 (after 24 h). For each experimental condition, 5 samples were prepared. For each sample, 2 indentations were taken and the average was determined. Were made analysis using ANOVA and Tukey test. Were concluded that: a) using the Permite alloy with polishing after 24 h the surface hardness of restoration will be higher; b) the technique T2 enhances the hardness of dental amalgams and c) alloy Permite with polished immediately were statisticaly equal than Velvalloy polished after 24 h.ABM, ABC, ABPol2003-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392003000300020Materials Research v.6 n.3 2003reponame:Materials research (São Carlos. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:ABM ABC ABPOL10.1590/S1516-14392003000300020info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRamos,Juliana PanazzoloBenitez Catirse,Alma Blásida Concepción ElizaurCorona,Silmara Aparecida Milorispa2003-11-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-14392003000300020Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/mrPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpdedz@power.ufscar.br1980-53731516-1439opendoar:2003-11-28T00:00Materials research (São Carlos. Online) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluación de la dureza superficial en amalgamas en función de tipos de aleaciones, momentos y tipos de pulimentos
title Evaluación de la dureza superficial en amalgamas en función de tipos de aleaciones, momentos y tipos de pulimentos
spellingShingle Evaluación de la dureza superficial en amalgamas en función de tipos de aleaciones, momentos y tipos de pulimentos
Ramos,Juliana Panazzolo
amalgam
surface hardness
polishing
repolishing
title_short Evaluación de la dureza superficial en amalgamas en función de tipos de aleaciones, momentos y tipos de pulimentos
title_full Evaluación de la dureza superficial en amalgamas en función de tipos de aleaciones, momentos y tipos de pulimentos
title_fullStr Evaluación de la dureza superficial en amalgamas en función de tipos de aleaciones, momentos y tipos de pulimentos
title_full_unstemmed Evaluación de la dureza superficial en amalgamas en función de tipos de aleaciones, momentos y tipos de pulimentos
title_sort Evaluación de la dureza superficial en amalgamas en función de tipos de aleaciones, momentos y tipos de pulimentos
author Ramos,Juliana Panazzolo
author_facet Ramos,Juliana Panazzolo
Benitez Catirse,Alma Blásida Concepción Elizaur
Corona,Silmara Aparecida Milori
author_role author
author2 Benitez Catirse,Alma Blásida Concepción Elizaur
Corona,Silmara Aparecida Milori
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ramos,Juliana Panazzolo
Benitez Catirse,Alma Blásida Concepción Elizaur
Corona,Silmara Aparecida Milori
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv amalgam
surface hardness
polishing
repolishing
topic amalgam
surface hardness
polishing
repolishing
description The aim of this study was to analyze in vitro surface hardness (micro-indentation tester Wolpert) of different types of amalgam alloys varying the technique and polishing time. Tested were the amalgam: Velvalloy, Permite e Dispersalloy. For each material, 2 polishing techniques were accomplished: T1 (bladed finishing burs + abrasive rubber points + pumice-water slurry in Robinson polishing brush) and; T2 (abrasive rubber points + pumice-water slurry in Robinson polishing brush), at 2 periods of time: P1 (immediately - 15 min after condensation) and P2 (after 24 h). For each experimental condition, 5 samples were prepared. For each sample, 2 indentations were taken and the average was determined. Were made analysis using ANOVA and Tukey test. Were concluded that: a) using the Permite alloy with polishing after 24 h the surface hardness of restoration will be higher; b) the technique T2 enhances the hardness of dental amalgams and c) alloy Permite with polished immediately were statisticaly equal than Velvalloy polished after 24 h.
publishDate 2003
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2003-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392003000300020
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392003000300020
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1516-14392003000300020
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABM, ABC, ABPol
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABM, ABC, ABPol
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Materials Research v.6 n.3 2003
reponame:Materials research (São Carlos. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron:ABM ABC ABPOL
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron_str ABM ABC ABPOL
institution ABM ABC ABPOL
reponame_str Materials research (São Carlos. Online)
collection Materials research (São Carlos. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Materials research (São Carlos. Online) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dedz@power.ufscar.br
_version_ 1754212657367351296