Evaluación de la dureza superficial en amalgamas en función de tipos de aleaciones, momentos y tipos de pulimentos
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2003 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Materials research (São Carlos. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392003000300020 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to analyze in vitro surface hardness (micro-indentation tester Wolpert) of different types of amalgam alloys varying the technique and polishing time. Tested were the amalgam: Velvalloy, Permite e Dispersalloy. For each material, 2 polishing techniques were accomplished: T1 (bladed finishing burs + abrasive rubber points + pumice-water slurry in Robinson polishing brush) and; T2 (abrasive rubber points + pumice-water slurry in Robinson polishing brush), at 2 periods of time: P1 (immediately - 15 min after condensation) and P2 (after 24 h). For each experimental condition, 5 samples were prepared. For each sample, 2 indentations were taken and the average was determined. Were made analysis using ANOVA and Tukey test. Were concluded that: a) using the Permite alloy with polishing after 24 h the surface hardness of restoration will be higher; b) the technique T2 enhances the hardness of dental amalgams and c) alloy Permite with polished immediately were statisticaly equal than Velvalloy polished after 24 h. |
id |
ABMABCABPOL-1_6570630128ebf6d70221b8e61c1db451 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-14392003000300020 |
network_acronym_str |
ABMABCABPOL-1 |
network_name_str |
Materials research (São Carlos. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluación de la dureza superficial en amalgamas en función de tipos de aleaciones, momentos y tipos de pulimentosamalgamsurface hardnesspolishingrepolishingThe aim of this study was to analyze in vitro surface hardness (micro-indentation tester Wolpert) of different types of amalgam alloys varying the technique and polishing time. Tested were the amalgam: Velvalloy, Permite e Dispersalloy. For each material, 2 polishing techniques were accomplished: T1 (bladed finishing burs + abrasive rubber points + pumice-water slurry in Robinson polishing brush) and; T2 (abrasive rubber points + pumice-water slurry in Robinson polishing brush), at 2 periods of time: P1 (immediately - 15 min after condensation) and P2 (after 24 h). For each experimental condition, 5 samples were prepared. For each sample, 2 indentations were taken and the average was determined. Were made analysis using ANOVA and Tukey test. Were concluded that: a) using the Permite alloy with polishing after 24 h the surface hardness of restoration will be higher; b) the technique T2 enhances the hardness of dental amalgams and c) alloy Permite with polished immediately were statisticaly equal than Velvalloy polished after 24 h.ABM, ABC, ABPol2003-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392003000300020Materials Research v.6 n.3 2003reponame:Materials research (São Carlos. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:ABM ABC ABPOL10.1590/S1516-14392003000300020info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRamos,Juliana PanazzoloBenitez Catirse,Alma Blásida Concepción ElizaurCorona,Silmara Aparecida Milorispa2003-11-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-14392003000300020Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/mrPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpdedz@power.ufscar.br1980-53731516-1439opendoar:2003-11-28T00:00Materials research (São Carlos. Online) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluación de la dureza superficial en amalgamas en función de tipos de aleaciones, momentos y tipos de pulimentos |
title |
Evaluación de la dureza superficial en amalgamas en función de tipos de aleaciones, momentos y tipos de pulimentos |
spellingShingle |
Evaluación de la dureza superficial en amalgamas en función de tipos de aleaciones, momentos y tipos de pulimentos Ramos,Juliana Panazzolo amalgam surface hardness polishing repolishing |
title_short |
Evaluación de la dureza superficial en amalgamas en función de tipos de aleaciones, momentos y tipos de pulimentos |
title_full |
Evaluación de la dureza superficial en amalgamas en función de tipos de aleaciones, momentos y tipos de pulimentos |
title_fullStr |
Evaluación de la dureza superficial en amalgamas en función de tipos de aleaciones, momentos y tipos de pulimentos |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluación de la dureza superficial en amalgamas en función de tipos de aleaciones, momentos y tipos de pulimentos |
title_sort |
Evaluación de la dureza superficial en amalgamas en función de tipos de aleaciones, momentos y tipos de pulimentos |
author |
Ramos,Juliana Panazzolo |
author_facet |
Ramos,Juliana Panazzolo Benitez Catirse,Alma Blásida Concepción Elizaur Corona,Silmara Aparecida Milori |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Benitez Catirse,Alma Blásida Concepción Elizaur Corona,Silmara Aparecida Milori |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ramos,Juliana Panazzolo Benitez Catirse,Alma Blásida Concepción Elizaur Corona,Silmara Aparecida Milori |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
amalgam surface hardness polishing repolishing |
topic |
amalgam surface hardness polishing repolishing |
description |
The aim of this study was to analyze in vitro surface hardness (micro-indentation tester Wolpert) of different types of amalgam alloys varying the technique and polishing time. Tested were the amalgam: Velvalloy, Permite e Dispersalloy. For each material, 2 polishing techniques were accomplished: T1 (bladed finishing burs + abrasive rubber points + pumice-water slurry in Robinson polishing brush) and; T2 (abrasive rubber points + pumice-water slurry in Robinson polishing brush), at 2 periods of time: P1 (immediately - 15 min after condensation) and P2 (after 24 h). For each experimental condition, 5 samples were prepared. For each sample, 2 indentations were taken and the average was determined. Were made analysis using ANOVA and Tukey test. Were concluded that: a) using the Permite alloy with polishing after 24 h the surface hardness of restoration will be higher; b) the technique T2 enhances the hardness of dental amalgams and c) alloy Permite with polished immediately were statisticaly equal than Velvalloy polished after 24 h. |
publishDate |
2003 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2003-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392003000300020 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392003000300020 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1516-14392003000300020 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABM, ABC, ABPol |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABM, ABC, ABPol |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Materials Research v.6 n.3 2003 reponame:Materials research (São Carlos. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) instacron:ABM ABC ABPOL |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
instacron_str |
ABM ABC ABPOL |
institution |
ABM ABC ABPOL |
reponame_str |
Materials research (São Carlos. Online) |
collection |
Materials research (São Carlos. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Materials research (São Carlos. Online) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dedz@power.ufscar.br |
_version_ |
1754212657367351296 |