A Comparative Study of Cartesian and Delta 3D Printers on Producing PLA Parts

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Schmitt,Betina Madeira
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Zirbes,Christiano Fraga, Bonin,Cassiano, Lohmann,Daniel, Lencina,Diovani Castoldi, Netto,Aurélio da Costa Sabino
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Materials research (São Carlos. Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392017000800883
Resumo: The additive manufacturing processes emerged at the end of the last century and became popular by low-cost 3D printers. The most used printers work on a cartesian configuration, but recently were launched delta machines. These 3D printers use a more complex control system due to their trajectories generation but may present some advantages over the cartesian configuration. To increase the knowledge about additive manufacturing, a comparative study with cartesian and delta printers was performed to evaluate the performance on printing a testing part. Three samples were produced in each printer and compared based on surface quality, manufacturing time, mass and dimensional measurement. The printed objects were 3D scanned for comparing the digitized geometry by aligning the point cloud generated to its virtual 3D model. The parts produced in delta printer obtained better surface quality, while cartesian printer provided better dimensional accuracy. The results also showed that the variation of the mass and time to produce the parts were not significant.
id ABMABCABPOL-1_ce326bd2f742284ec8d4787fdf1c3f9a
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-14392017000800883
network_acronym_str ABMABCABPOL-1
network_name_str Materials research (São Carlos. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling A Comparative Study of Cartesian and Delta 3D Printers on Producing PLA Parts3D printingCartesian PrinterDelta PrinterDimensional EvaluationSurface qualityThe additive manufacturing processes emerged at the end of the last century and became popular by low-cost 3D printers. The most used printers work on a cartesian configuration, but recently were launched delta machines. These 3D printers use a more complex control system due to their trajectories generation but may present some advantages over the cartesian configuration. To increase the knowledge about additive manufacturing, a comparative study with cartesian and delta printers was performed to evaluate the performance on printing a testing part. Three samples were produced in each printer and compared based on surface quality, manufacturing time, mass and dimensional measurement. The printed objects were 3D scanned for comparing the digitized geometry by aligning the point cloud generated to its virtual 3D model. The parts produced in delta printer obtained better surface quality, while cartesian printer provided better dimensional accuracy. The results also showed that the variation of the mass and time to produce the parts were not significant.ABM, ABC, ABPol2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392017000800883Materials Research v.20 suppl.2 2017reponame:Materials research (São Carlos. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:ABM ABC ABPOL10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2016-1039info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSchmitt,Betina MadeiraZirbes,Christiano FragaBonin,CassianoLohmann,DanielLencina,Diovani CastoldiNetto,Aurélio da Costa Sabinoeng2018-04-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-14392017000800883Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/mrPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpdedz@power.ufscar.br1980-53731516-1439opendoar:2018-04-12T00:00Materials research (São Carlos. Online) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A Comparative Study of Cartesian and Delta 3D Printers on Producing PLA Parts
title A Comparative Study of Cartesian and Delta 3D Printers on Producing PLA Parts
spellingShingle A Comparative Study of Cartesian and Delta 3D Printers on Producing PLA Parts
Schmitt,Betina Madeira
3D printing
Cartesian Printer
Delta Printer
Dimensional Evaluation
Surface quality
title_short A Comparative Study of Cartesian and Delta 3D Printers on Producing PLA Parts
title_full A Comparative Study of Cartesian and Delta 3D Printers on Producing PLA Parts
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Cartesian and Delta 3D Printers on Producing PLA Parts
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Cartesian and Delta 3D Printers on Producing PLA Parts
title_sort A Comparative Study of Cartesian and Delta 3D Printers on Producing PLA Parts
author Schmitt,Betina Madeira
author_facet Schmitt,Betina Madeira
Zirbes,Christiano Fraga
Bonin,Cassiano
Lohmann,Daniel
Lencina,Diovani Castoldi
Netto,Aurélio da Costa Sabino
author_role author
author2 Zirbes,Christiano Fraga
Bonin,Cassiano
Lohmann,Daniel
Lencina,Diovani Castoldi
Netto,Aurélio da Costa Sabino
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Schmitt,Betina Madeira
Zirbes,Christiano Fraga
Bonin,Cassiano
Lohmann,Daniel
Lencina,Diovani Castoldi
Netto,Aurélio da Costa Sabino
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv 3D printing
Cartesian Printer
Delta Printer
Dimensional Evaluation
Surface quality
topic 3D printing
Cartesian Printer
Delta Printer
Dimensional Evaluation
Surface quality
description The additive manufacturing processes emerged at the end of the last century and became popular by low-cost 3D printers. The most used printers work on a cartesian configuration, but recently were launched delta machines. These 3D printers use a more complex control system due to their trajectories generation but may present some advantages over the cartesian configuration. To increase the knowledge about additive manufacturing, a comparative study with cartesian and delta printers was performed to evaluate the performance on printing a testing part. Three samples were produced in each printer and compared based on surface quality, manufacturing time, mass and dimensional measurement. The printed objects were 3D scanned for comparing the digitized geometry by aligning the point cloud generated to its virtual 3D model. The parts produced in delta printer obtained better surface quality, while cartesian printer provided better dimensional accuracy. The results also showed that the variation of the mass and time to produce the parts were not significant.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392017000800883
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392017000800883
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2016-1039
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABM, ABC, ABPol
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABM, ABC, ABPol
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Materials Research v.20 suppl.2 2017
reponame:Materials research (São Carlos. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron:ABM ABC ABPOL
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron_str ABM ABC ABPOL
institution ABM ABC ABPOL
reponame_str Materials research (São Carlos. Online)
collection Materials research (São Carlos. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Materials research (São Carlos. Online) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dedz@power.ufscar.br
_version_ 1754212673810071552

Registros relacionados