Validation of the Brazilian version of the Clinical Gait and Balance Scale and comparison with the Berg Balance Scale

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Baggio,Jussara Almeida Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Curtarelli,Monica de Biagi, Rodrigues,Guilherme Riccioppo, Tumas,Vitor
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2013000900621
Resumo: Objective To validate the Clinical Gait and Balance Scale (GABS) for a Brazilian population of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and to compare it to the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Methods One hundred and seven PD patients were evaluated by shortened UPDRS motor scale (sUPDRSm), Hoehn and Yahr (HY), Schwab and England scale (SE), Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I), Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOG-Q), BBS and GABS. Results The internal consistency of the GABS was 0.94, the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were 0.94 and 0.98 respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.72, with a sensitivity of 0.75 and specificity of 0.6, to discriminate patients with a history of falls in the last twelve months, for a cut-off score of 13 points. Conclusions Our study shows that the Brazilian version of the GABS is a reliable and valid instrument to assess gait and balance in PD.
id ABNEURO-1_015290db7f479d90ace24a73e9a1f1dc
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0004-282X2013000900621
network_acronym_str ABNEURO-1
network_name_str Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Validation of the Brazilian version of the Clinical Gait and Balance Scale and comparison with the Berg Balance ScaleParkinson's diseasebalancegaitvalidation studies Objective To validate the Clinical Gait and Balance Scale (GABS) for a Brazilian population of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and to compare it to the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Methods One hundred and seven PD patients were evaluated by shortened UPDRS motor scale (sUPDRSm), Hoehn and Yahr (HY), Schwab and England scale (SE), Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I), Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOG-Q), BBS and GABS. Results The internal consistency of the GABS was 0.94, the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were 0.94 and 0.98 respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.72, with a sensitivity of 0.75 and specificity of 0.6, to discriminate patients with a history of falls in the last twelve months, for a cut-off score of 13 points. Conclusions Our study shows that the Brazilian version of the GABS is a reliable and valid instrument to assess gait and balance in PD. Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO2013-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2013000900621Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.71 n.9A 2013reponame:Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)instname:Academia Brasileira de Neurologiainstacron:ABNEURO10.1590/0004-282X20130107info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBaggio,Jussara Almeida OliveiraCurtarelli,Monica de BiagiRodrigues,Guilherme RiccioppoTumas,Vitoreng2013-10-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0004-282X2013000900621Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/anphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista.arquivos@abneuro.org1678-42270004-282Xopendoar:2013-10-10T00:00Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Neurologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Validation of the Brazilian version of the Clinical Gait and Balance Scale and comparison with the Berg Balance Scale
title Validation of the Brazilian version of the Clinical Gait and Balance Scale and comparison with the Berg Balance Scale
spellingShingle Validation of the Brazilian version of the Clinical Gait and Balance Scale and comparison with the Berg Balance Scale
Baggio,Jussara Almeida Oliveira
Parkinson's disease
balance
gait
validation studies
title_short Validation of the Brazilian version of the Clinical Gait and Balance Scale and comparison with the Berg Balance Scale
title_full Validation of the Brazilian version of the Clinical Gait and Balance Scale and comparison with the Berg Balance Scale
title_fullStr Validation of the Brazilian version of the Clinical Gait and Balance Scale and comparison with the Berg Balance Scale
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Brazilian version of the Clinical Gait and Balance Scale and comparison with the Berg Balance Scale
title_sort Validation of the Brazilian version of the Clinical Gait and Balance Scale and comparison with the Berg Balance Scale
author Baggio,Jussara Almeida Oliveira
author_facet Baggio,Jussara Almeida Oliveira
Curtarelli,Monica de Biagi
Rodrigues,Guilherme Riccioppo
Tumas,Vitor
author_role author
author2 Curtarelli,Monica de Biagi
Rodrigues,Guilherme Riccioppo
Tumas,Vitor
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Baggio,Jussara Almeida Oliveira
Curtarelli,Monica de Biagi
Rodrigues,Guilherme Riccioppo
Tumas,Vitor
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Parkinson's disease
balance
gait
validation studies
topic Parkinson's disease
balance
gait
validation studies
description Objective To validate the Clinical Gait and Balance Scale (GABS) for a Brazilian population of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and to compare it to the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Methods One hundred and seven PD patients were evaluated by shortened UPDRS motor scale (sUPDRSm), Hoehn and Yahr (HY), Schwab and England scale (SE), Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I), Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOG-Q), BBS and GABS. Results The internal consistency of the GABS was 0.94, the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were 0.94 and 0.98 respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.72, with a sensitivity of 0.75 and specificity of 0.6, to discriminate patients with a history of falls in the last twelve months, for a cut-off score of 13 points. Conclusions Our study shows that the Brazilian version of the GABS is a reliable and valid instrument to assess gait and balance in PD.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2013000900621
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2013000900621
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0004-282X20130107
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.71 n.9A 2013
reponame:Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
instname:Academia Brasileira de Neurologia
instacron:ABNEURO
instname_str Academia Brasileira de Neurologia
instacron_str ABNEURO
institution ABNEURO
reponame_str Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
collection Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Neurologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista.arquivos@abneuro.org
_version_ 1754212775291256832