Hematoma volumes of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: the ellipse (ABC/2) method yielded volumes smaller than those measured using the planimetric method

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Maeda,Adriano Keijiro
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Aguiar,Luiz Roberto, Martins,Carolina, Bichinho,Gerson Linck, Gariba,Munir Antonio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2013000800540
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To compare two different methods for measuring intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) volume: the ellipse volume (called ABC/2), and the software-aided planimetric. METHODS: Four observers evaluated 20 brain computed tomography (CT) scans with spontaneous ICH. Each professional measured the volume using the ABC/2 and the planimetric methods. The average volumes were obtained, and the intra- and inter-rater variability was determined. RESULTS: There is an absolute 2.24 cm3 average difference between both methodologies. Volumes yielded by the ABC/2 method were as much as 14.9% smaller than by the planimetric one. An intra-observer variability rate of 0.46% was found for the planimetric method and 0.18% for the ABC/2. The inter-observer rates were 1.69 and 1.11% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both methods are reproducible. The ABC/2 yielded hemorrhage volumes as much as 14.9% smaller than those measured using the planimetric methodology.
id ABNEURO-1_11bd494e5368d3728fd6b57a1e10a359
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0004-282X2013000800540
network_acronym_str ABNEURO-1
network_name_str Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Hematoma volumes of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: the ellipse (ABC/2) method yielded volumes smaller than those measured using the planimetric methodcerebral hemorrhagetomographyevaluation studies OBJECTIVE: To compare two different methods for measuring intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) volume: the ellipse volume (called ABC/2), and the software-aided planimetric. METHODS: Four observers evaluated 20 brain computed tomography (CT) scans with spontaneous ICH. Each professional measured the volume using the ABC/2 and the planimetric methods. The average volumes were obtained, and the intra- and inter-rater variability was determined. RESULTS: There is an absolute 2.24 cm3 average difference between both methodologies. Volumes yielded by the ABC/2 method were as much as 14.9% smaller than by the planimetric one. An intra-observer variability rate of 0.46% was found for the planimetric method and 0.18% for the ABC/2. The inter-observer rates were 1.69 and 1.11% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both methods are reproducible. The ABC/2 yielded hemorrhage volumes as much as 14.9% smaller than those measured using the planimetric methodology. Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO2013-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2013000800540Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.71 n.8 2013reponame:Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)instname:Academia Brasileira de Neurologiainstacron:ABNEURO10.1590/0004-282X20130084info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMaeda,Adriano KeijiroAguiar,Luiz RobertoMartins,CarolinaBichinho,Gerson LinckGariba,Munir Antonioeng2013-08-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0004-282X2013000800540Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/anphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista.arquivos@abneuro.org1678-42270004-282Xopendoar:2013-08-26T00:00Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Neurologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Hematoma volumes of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: the ellipse (ABC/2) method yielded volumes smaller than those measured using the planimetric method
title Hematoma volumes of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: the ellipse (ABC/2) method yielded volumes smaller than those measured using the planimetric method
spellingShingle Hematoma volumes of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: the ellipse (ABC/2) method yielded volumes smaller than those measured using the planimetric method
Maeda,Adriano Keijiro
cerebral hemorrhage
tomography
evaluation studies
title_short Hematoma volumes of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: the ellipse (ABC/2) method yielded volumes smaller than those measured using the planimetric method
title_full Hematoma volumes of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: the ellipse (ABC/2) method yielded volumes smaller than those measured using the planimetric method
title_fullStr Hematoma volumes of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: the ellipse (ABC/2) method yielded volumes smaller than those measured using the planimetric method
title_full_unstemmed Hematoma volumes of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: the ellipse (ABC/2) method yielded volumes smaller than those measured using the planimetric method
title_sort Hematoma volumes of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: the ellipse (ABC/2) method yielded volumes smaller than those measured using the planimetric method
author Maeda,Adriano Keijiro
author_facet Maeda,Adriano Keijiro
Aguiar,Luiz Roberto
Martins,Carolina
Bichinho,Gerson Linck
Gariba,Munir Antonio
author_role author
author2 Aguiar,Luiz Roberto
Martins,Carolina
Bichinho,Gerson Linck
Gariba,Munir Antonio
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Maeda,Adriano Keijiro
Aguiar,Luiz Roberto
Martins,Carolina
Bichinho,Gerson Linck
Gariba,Munir Antonio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv cerebral hemorrhage
tomography
evaluation studies
topic cerebral hemorrhage
tomography
evaluation studies
description OBJECTIVE: To compare two different methods for measuring intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) volume: the ellipse volume (called ABC/2), and the software-aided planimetric. METHODS: Four observers evaluated 20 brain computed tomography (CT) scans with spontaneous ICH. Each professional measured the volume using the ABC/2 and the planimetric methods. The average volumes were obtained, and the intra- and inter-rater variability was determined. RESULTS: There is an absolute 2.24 cm3 average difference between both methodologies. Volumes yielded by the ABC/2 method were as much as 14.9% smaller than by the planimetric one. An intra-observer variability rate of 0.46% was found for the planimetric method and 0.18% for the ABC/2. The inter-observer rates were 1.69 and 1.11% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both methods are reproducible. The ABC/2 yielded hemorrhage volumes as much as 14.9% smaller than those measured using the planimetric methodology.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2013000800540
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2013000800540
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0004-282X20130084
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.71 n.8 2013
reponame:Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
instname:Academia Brasileira de Neurologia
instacron:ABNEURO
instname_str Academia Brasileira de Neurologia
instacron_str ABNEURO
institution ABNEURO
reponame_str Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
collection Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Neurologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista.arquivos@abneuro.org
_version_ 1754212775222050816