Can the positions of the spastic upper limb in stroke survivors help muscle choice for botulinum toxin injections?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gomes,André Luiz Salcedo
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Mello,Francisco Falleiros de, Cocicov Neto,Jorge, Benedeti,Marcelo Causin, Modolo,Luis Felipe Miras, Riberto,Marcelo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2019000800568
Resumo: ABSTRACT Motor impairments in stroke survivors are prevalent and contribute to dependence in daily activities, pain and overall disability, which can further upper-limb disability. Treatment with botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) is indicated for focal spasticity and requires knowledge of biomechanics and anatomy to best select muscles to be injected in the limb. Objective: We aimed to describe the frequency of posture patterns in a Brazilian sample of stroke survivors and correlate them with recommendations of muscle selection for treatment with BoNT-A. Methods: Fifty stroke patients with spastic upper limbs scheduled for neuromuscular block were photographed and physically examined, to be classified by three independent evaluators according to Hefter's classification. Muscles that were injected with BoNT-A by their routine doctors were retrieved from medical charts. Results: Pattern III and IV were the most common (64.7%, 21.6%). We further subclassified pattern III according to the rotation of the shoulder, which effectively interfered in muscle choice. The muscles most frequently treated were shoulder adductors and internal rotators, elbow flexors and extensors, in forearm, the pronator teres and finger and wrist flexors, and, in the hand the adductor pollicis. Conclusion: Frequencies of upper-limb postures differed from previous reports. Other clinical features, besides spasticity, interfered with muscle choice for BoNT-A injection, which only partially followed the recommendations in the literature.
id ABNEURO-1_193162d4acc9f58ae58b597993d47d42
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0004-282X2019000800568
network_acronym_str ABNEURO-1
network_name_str Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Can the positions of the spastic upper limb in stroke survivors help muscle choice for botulinum toxin injections?Cerebrovascular disordersmuscle spasticitybotulinum toxins, type ArehabilitationgoalsABSTRACT Motor impairments in stroke survivors are prevalent and contribute to dependence in daily activities, pain and overall disability, which can further upper-limb disability. Treatment with botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) is indicated for focal spasticity and requires knowledge of biomechanics and anatomy to best select muscles to be injected in the limb. Objective: We aimed to describe the frequency of posture patterns in a Brazilian sample of stroke survivors and correlate them with recommendations of muscle selection for treatment with BoNT-A. Methods: Fifty stroke patients with spastic upper limbs scheduled for neuromuscular block were photographed and physically examined, to be classified by three independent evaluators according to Hefter's classification. Muscles that were injected with BoNT-A by their routine doctors were retrieved from medical charts. Results: Pattern III and IV were the most common (64.7%, 21.6%). We further subclassified pattern III according to the rotation of the shoulder, which effectively interfered in muscle choice. The muscles most frequently treated were shoulder adductors and internal rotators, elbow flexors and extensors, in forearm, the pronator teres and finger and wrist flexors, and, in the hand the adductor pollicis. Conclusion: Frequencies of upper-limb postures differed from previous reports. Other clinical features, besides spasticity, interfered with muscle choice for BoNT-A injection, which only partially followed the recommendations in the literature.Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO2019-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2019000800568Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.77 n.8 2019reponame:Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)instname:Academia Brasileira de Neurologiainstacron:ABNEURO10.1590/0004-282x20190087info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGomes,André Luiz SalcedoMello,Francisco Falleiros deCocicov Neto,JorgeBenedeti,Marcelo CausinModolo,Luis Felipe MirasRiberto,Marceloeng2019-09-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0004-282X2019000800568Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/anphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista.arquivos@abneuro.org1678-42270004-282Xopendoar:2019-09-02T00:00Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Neurologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Can the positions of the spastic upper limb in stroke survivors help muscle choice for botulinum toxin injections?
title Can the positions of the spastic upper limb in stroke survivors help muscle choice for botulinum toxin injections?
spellingShingle Can the positions of the spastic upper limb in stroke survivors help muscle choice for botulinum toxin injections?
Gomes,André Luiz Salcedo
Cerebrovascular disorders
muscle spasticity
botulinum toxins, type A
rehabilitation
goals
title_short Can the positions of the spastic upper limb in stroke survivors help muscle choice for botulinum toxin injections?
title_full Can the positions of the spastic upper limb in stroke survivors help muscle choice for botulinum toxin injections?
title_fullStr Can the positions of the spastic upper limb in stroke survivors help muscle choice for botulinum toxin injections?
title_full_unstemmed Can the positions of the spastic upper limb in stroke survivors help muscle choice for botulinum toxin injections?
title_sort Can the positions of the spastic upper limb in stroke survivors help muscle choice for botulinum toxin injections?
author Gomes,André Luiz Salcedo
author_facet Gomes,André Luiz Salcedo
Mello,Francisco Falleiros de
Cocicov Neto,Jorge
Benedeti,Marcelo Causin
Modolo,Luis Felipe Miras
Riberto,Marcelo
author_role author
author2 Mello,Francisco Falleiros de
Cocicov Neto,Jorge
Benedeti,Marcelo Causin
Modolo,Luis Felipe Miras
Riberto,Marcelo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gomes,André Luiz Salcedo
Mello,Francisco Falleiros de
Cocicov Neto,Jorge
Benedeti,Marcelo Causin
Modolo,Luis Felipe Miras
Riberto,Marcelo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cerebrovascular disorders
muscle spasticity
botulinum toxins, type A
rehabilitation
goals
topic Cerebrovascular disorders
muscle spasticity
botulinum toxins, type A
rehabilitation
goals
description ABSTRACT Motor impairments in stroke survivors are prevalent and contribute to dependence in daily activities, pain and overall disability, which can further upper-limb disability. Treatment with botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) is indicated for focal spasticity and requires knowledge of biomechanics and anatomy to best select muscles to be injected in the limb. Objective: We aimed to describe the frequency of posture patterns in a Brazilian sample of stroke survivors and correlate them with recommendations of muscle selection for treatment with BoNT-A. Methods: Fifty stroke patients with spastic upper limbs scheduled for neuromuscular block were photographed and physically examined, to be classified by three independent evaluators according to Hefter's classification. Muscles that were injected with BoNT-A by their routine doctors were retrieved from medical charts. Results: Pattern III and IV were the most common (64.7%, 21.6%). We further subclassified pattern III according to the rotation of the shoulder, which effectively interfered in muscle choice. The muscles most frequently treated were shoulder adductors and internal rotators, elbow flexors and extensors, in forearm, the pronator teres and finger and wrist flexors, and, in the hand the adductor pollicis. Conclusion: Frequencies of upper-limb postures differed from previous reports. Other clinical features, besides spasticity, interfered with muscle choice for BoNT-A injection, which only partially followed the recommendations in the literature.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2019000800568
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2019000800568
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0004-282x20190087
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.77 n.8 2019
reponame:Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
instname:Academia Brasileira de Neurologia
instacron:ABNEURO
instname_str Academia Brasileira de Neurologia
instacron_str ABNEURO
institution ABNEURO
reponame_str Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
collection Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Neurologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista.arquivos@abneuro.org
_version_ 1754212785469784064