Evaluation of subjective vertical perception among stroke patients: a systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2021001101026 |
Resumo: | Abstract Background: Verticality misperception is relatively common among patients after stroke, and it may be evaluated in terms of (a) subjective visual vertical (SVV), (b) subjective haptic vertical (SHV) and (c) subjective postural vertical (SPV). To better understand these assessment methods, we conducted a systematic review of the methodological characteristics of different protocols for evaluating SVV, SHV and SPV among individuals after stroke. Objective: To standardize the methodological characteristics of protocols for evaluating verticality perception after stroke. Methods: We searched the following databases: PUBMED, regional BVS portal (MEDLINE, LILACS, IBECS, CUBMED, Psychology Index and LIS), CINAHL, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Science Direct, Cochrane Library and PEDro. Two review authors independently used the QUADAS method (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) and extracted data. Results: We included 21 studies in the review: most (80.9%) used SVV, eight (38.1%) used SPV and four (19.0%) used SHV. We observed high variability in assessments of verticality perception, due to patient positions, devices used, numbers of repetitions and angle of inclination for starting the tests. Conclusion: This systematic review was one of the first to explore all the methods of assessing verticality perception after stroke, and it provides crucial information on how to perform the tests, in order to guide future researchers/clinicians. |
id |
ABNEURO-1_436b63b727b049c3c59cd828106673ef |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0004-282X2021001101026 |
network_acronym_str |
ABNEURO-1 |
network_name_str |
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of subjective vertical perception among stroke patients: a systematic reviewStrokeHealth Research EvaluationVerticalitySubjective Visual VerticalSubjective Haptic VerticalSubjective Postural VerticalAbstract Background: Verticality misperception is relatively common among patients after stroke, and it may be evaluated in terms of (a) subjective visual vertical (SVV), (b) subjective haptic vertical (SHV) and (c) subjective postural vertical (SPV). To better understand these assessment methods, we conducted a systematic review of the methodological characteristics of different protocols for evaluating SVV, SHV and SPV among individuals after stroke. Objective: To standardize the methodological characteristics of protocols for evaluating verticality perception after stroke. Methods: We searched the following databases: PUBMED, regional BVS portal (MEDLINE, LILACS, IBECS, CUBMED, Psychology Index and LIS), CINAHL, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Science Direct, Cochrane Library and PEDro. Two review authors independently used the QUADAS method (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) and extracted data. Results: We included 21 studies in the review: most (80.9%) used SVV, eight (38.1%) used SPV and four (19.0%) used SHV. We observed high variability in assessments of verticality perception, due to patient positions, devices used, numbers of repetitions and angle of inclination for starting the tests. Conclusion: This systematic review was one of the first to explore all the methods of assessing verticality perception after stroke, and it provides crucial information on how to perform the tests, in order to guide future researchers/clinicians.Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO2021-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2021001101026Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.79 n.11 2021reponame:Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)instname:Academia Brasileira de Neurologiainstacron:ABNEURO10.1590/0004-282x-anp-2020-0584info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira,Luana RibeiroFerreira,Flávio José Pereira De AlmeidaCampos,Fernanda AparecidaLuvizutto,Gustavo JoséSouza,Luciane Aparecida Pascucci Sande Deeng2021-11-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0004-282X2021001101026Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/anphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista.arquivos@abneuro.org1678-42270004-282Xopendoar:2021-11-17T00:00Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Neurologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of subjective vertical perception among stroke patients: a systematic review |
title |
Evaluation of subjective vertical perception among stroke patients: a systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of subjective vertical perception among stroke patients: a systematic review Ferreira,Luana Ribeiro Stroke Health Research Evaluation Verticality Subjective Visual Vertical Subjective Haptic Vertical Subjective Postural Vertical |
title_short |
Evaluation of subjective vertical perception among stroke patients: a systematic review |
title_full |
Evaluation of subjective vertical perception among stroke patients: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of subjective vertical perception among stroke patients: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of subjective vertical perception among stroke patients: a systematic review |
title_sort |
Evaluation of subjective vertical perception among stroke patients: a systematic review |
author |
Ferreira,Luana Ribeiro |
author_facet |
Ferreira,Luana Ribeiro Ferreira,Flávio José Pereira De Almeida Campos,Fernanda Aparecida Luvizutto,Gustavo José Souza,Luciane Aparecida Pascucci Sande De |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferreira,Flávio José Pereira De Almeida Campos,Fernanda Aparecida Luvizutto,Gustavo José Souza,Luciane Aparecida Pascucci Sande De |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira,Luana Ribeiro Ferreira,Flávio José Pereira De Almeida Campos,Fernanda Aparecida Luvizutto,Gustavo José Souza,Luciane Aparecida Pascucci Sande De |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Stroke Health Research Evaluation Verticality Subjective Visual Vertical Subjective Haptic Vertical Subjective Postural Vertical |
topic |
Stroke Health Research Evaluation Verticality Subjective Visual Vertical Subjective Haptic Vertical Subjective Postural Vertical |
description |
Abstract Background: Verticality misperception is relatively common among patients after stroke, and it may be evaluated in terms of (a) subjective visual vertical (SVV), (b) subjective haptic vertical (SHV) and (c) subjective postural vertical (SPV). To better understand these assessment methods, we conducted a systematic review of the methodological characteristics of different protocols for evaluating SVV, SHV and SPV among individuals after stroke. Objective: To standardize the methodological characteristics of protocols for evaluating verticality perception after stroke. Methods: We searched the following databases: PUBMED, regional BVS portal (MEDLINE, LILACS, IBECS, CUBMED, Psychology Index and LIS), CINAHL, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Science Direct, Cochrane Library and PEDro. Two review authors independently used the QUADAS method (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) and extracted data. Results: We included 21 studies in the review: most (80.9%) used SVV, eight (38.1%) used SPV and four (19.0%) used SHV. We observed high variability in assessments of verticality perception, due to patient positions, devices used, numbers of repetitions and angle of inclination for starting the tests. Conclusion: This systematic review was one of the first to explore all the methods of assessing verticality perception after stroke, and it provides crucial information on how to perform the tests, in order to guide future researchers/clinicians. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-11-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2021001101026 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2021001101026 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0004-282x-anp-2020-0584 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.79 n.11 2021 reponame:Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) instname:Academia Brasileira de Neurologia instacron:ABNEURO |
instname_str |
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia |
instacron_str |
ABNEURO |
institution |
ABNEURO |
reponame_str |
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) |
collection |
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Neurologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revista.arquivos@abneuro.org |
_version_ |
1754212789660942336 |