The role of xerostomia in burning mouth syndrome: a case-control study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2014000200091 |
Resumo: | Objective : To assess the efficacy of anti-xerostomic topical medication (urea 10%) in patients with burning mouth syndrome (BMS). Method : Thirty-eight subjects diagnosed with BMS according to the International Association for the Study of Pain guidelines were randomized to either placebo (5% sodium carboxymethylcellulose, 0.15% methyl paraben, and 10% glycerol in distilled water qsp 100 g) or treatment (urea 10%) to be applied to the oral cavity 3-4 times per day for 3 months. The patients were evaluated before and after treatment with the following instruments: the EDOF-HC protocol (Orofacial Pain Clinic – Hospital das Clínicas), a xerostomia questionnaire, and quantitative sensory testing. Results : There were no differences in salivary flow or gustative, olfactory, or sensory thresholds (P>0.05). Fifteen (60%) patients reported improvement with the treatments (P=0.336). Conclusion : In conclusion, there were no differences between groups, and both exhibited an association between reported improvement and salivation. |
id |
ABNEURO-1_93aef8cdc355399387f8a067f864a0a6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0004-282X2014000200091 |
network_acronym_str |
ABNEURO-1 |
network_name_str |
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The role of xerostomia in burning mouth syndrome: a case-control studyxerostomiasalivary floworofacial painquantitative sensory testingburning mouth syndrome Objective : To assess the efficacy of anti-xerostomic topical medication (urea 10%) in patients with burning mouth syndrome (BMS). Method : Thirty-eight subjects diagnosed with BMS according to the International Association for the Study of Pain guidelines were randomized to either placebo (5% sodium carboxymethylcellulose, 0.15% methyl paraben, and 10% glycerol in distilled water qsp 100 g) or treatment (urea 10%) to be applied to the oral cavity 3-4 times per day for 3 months. The patients were evaluated before and after treatment with the following instruments: the EDOF-HC protocol (Orofacial Pain Clinic – Hospital das Clínicas), a xerostomia questionnaire, and quantitative sensory testing. Results : There were no differences in salivary flow or gustative, olfactory, or sensory thresholds (P>0.05). Fifteen (60%) patients reported improvement with the treatments (P=0.336). Conclusion : In conclusion, there were no differences between groups, and both exhibited an association between reported improvement and salivation. Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO2014-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2014000200091Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.72 n.2 2014reponame:Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)instname:Academia Brasileira de Neurologiainstacron:ABNEURO10.1590/0004-282X20130218info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Luciana Alvarenga daSiqueira,José Tadeu Tesseroli deTeixeira,Manoel JacobsenSiqueira,Silvia Regina Dowgan Tesseroli deeng2014-03-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0004-282X2014000200091Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/anphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista.arquivos@abneuro.org1678-42270004-282Xopendoar:2014-03-28T00:00Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Neurologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The role of xerostomia in burning mouth syndrome: a case-control study |
title |
The role of xerostomia in burning mouth syndrome: a case-control study |
spellingShingle |
The role of xerostomia in burning mouth syndrome: a case-control study Silva,Luciana Alvarenga da xerostomia salivary flow orofacial pain quantitative sensory testing burning mouth syndrome |
title_short |
The role of xerostomia in burning mouth syndrome: a case-control study |
title_full |
The role of xerostomia in burning mouth syndrome: a case-control study |
title_fullStr |
The role of xerostomia in burning mouth syndrome: a case-control study |
title_full_unstemmed |
The role of xerostomia in burning mouth syndrome: a case-control study |
title_sort |
The role of xerostomia in burning mouth syndrome: a case-control study |
author |
Silva,Luciana Alvarenga da |
author_facet |
Silva,Luciana Alvarenga da Siqueira,José Tadeu Tesseroli de Teixeira,Manoel Jacobsen Siqueira,Silvia Regina Dowgan Tesseroli de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Siqueira,José Tadeu Tesseroli de Teixeira,Manoel Jacobsen Siqueira,Silvia Regina Dowgan Tesseroli de |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva,Luciana Alvarenga da Siqueira,José Tadeu Tesseroli de Teixeira,Manoel Jacobsen Siqueira,Silvia Regina Dowgan Tesseroli de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
xerostomia salivary flow orofacial pain quantitative sensory testing burning mouth syndrome |
topic |
xerostomia salivary flow orofacial pain quantitative sensory testing burning mouth syndrome |
description |
Objective : To assess the efficacy of anti-xerostomic topical medication (urea 10%) in patients with burning mouth syndrome (BMS). Method : Thirty-eight subjects diagnosed with BMS according to the International Association for the Study of Pain guidelines were randomized to either placebo (5% sodium carboxymethylcellulose, 0.15% methyl paraben, and 10% glycerol in distilled water qsp 100 g) or treatment (urea 10%) to be applied to the oral cavity 3-4 times per day for 3 months. The patients were evaluated before and after treatment with the following instruments: the EDOF-HC protocol (Orofacial Pain Clinic – Hospital das Clínicas), a xerostomia questionnaire, and quantitative sensory testing. Results : There were no differences in salivary flow or gustative, olfactory, or sensory thresholds (P>0.05). Fifteen (60%) patients reported improvement with the treatments (P=0.336). Conclusion : In conclusion, there were no differences between groups, and both exhibited an association between reported improvement and salivation. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-02-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2014000200091 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2014000200091 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0004-282X20130218 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.72 n.2 2014 reponame:Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) instname:Academia Brasileira de Neurologia instacron:ABNEURO |
instname_str |
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia |
instacron_str |
ABNEURO |
institution |
ABNEURO |
reponame_str |
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) |
collection |
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Neurologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revista.arquivos@abneuro.org |
_version_ |
1754212775875313664 |