The role of xerostomia in burning mouth syndrome: a case-control study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva,Luciana Alvarenga da
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Siqueira,José Tadeu Tesseroli de, Teixeira,Manoel Jacobsen, Siqueira,Silvia Regina Dowgan Tesseroli de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2014000200091
Resumo: Objective : To assess the efficacy of anti-xerostomic topical medication (urea 10%) in patients with burning mouth syndrome (BMS). Method : Thirty-eight subjects diagnosed with BMS according to the International Association for the Study of Pain guidelines were randomized to either placebo (5% sodium carboxymethylcellulose, 0.15% methyl paraben, and 10% glycerol in distilled water qsp 100 g) or treatment (urea 10%) to be applied to the oral cavity 3-4 times per day for 3 months. The patients were evaluated before and after treatment with the following instruments: the EDOF-HC protocol (Orofacial Pain Clinic – Hospital das Clínicas), a xerostomia questionnaire, and quantitative sensory testing. Results : There were no differences in salivary flow or gustative, olfactory, or sensory thresholds (P>0.05). Fifteen (60%) patients reported improvement with the treatments (P=0.336). Conclusion : In conclusion, there were no differences between groups, and both exhibited an association between reported improvement and salivation.
id ABNEURO-1_93aef8cdc355399387f8a067f864a0a6
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0004-282X2014000200091
network_acronym_str ABNEURO-1
network_name_str Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The role of xerostomia in burning mouth syndrome: a case-control studyxerostomiasalivary floworofacial painquantitative sensory testingburning mouth syndrome Objective : To assess the efficacy of anti-xerostomic topical medication (urea 10%) in patients with burning mouth syndrome (BMS). Method : Thirty-eight subjects diagnosed with BMS according to the International Association for the Study of Pain guidelines were randomized to either placebo (5% sodium carboxymethylcellulose, 0.15% methyl paraben, and 10% glycerol in distilled water qsp 100 g) or treatment (urea 10%) to be applied to the oral cavity 3-4 times per day for 3 months. The patients were evaluated before and after treatment with the following instruments: the EDOF-HC protocol (Orofacial Pain Clinic – Hospital das Clínicas), a xerostomia questionnaire, and quantitative sensory testing. Results : There were no differences in salivary flow or gustative, olfactory, or sensory thresholds (P>0.05). Fifteen (60%) patients reported improvement with the treatments (P=0.336). Conclusion : In conclusion, there were no differences between groups, and both exhibited an association between reported improvement and salivation. Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO2014-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2014000200091Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.72 n.2 2014reponame:Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)instname:Academia Brasileira de Neurologiainstacron:ABNEURO10.1590/0004-282X20130218info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Luciana Alvarenga daSiqueira,José Tadeu Tesseroli deTeixeira,Manoel JacobsenSiqueira,Silvia Regina Dowgan Tesseroli deeng2014-03-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0004-282X2014000200091Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/anphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista.arquivos@abneuro.org1678-42270004-282Xopendoar:2014-03-28T00:00Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Neurologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The role of xerostomia in burning mouth syndrome: a case-control study
title The role of xerostomia in burning mouth syndrome: a case-control study
spellingShingle The role of xerostomia in burning mouth syndrome: a case-control study
Silva,Luciana Alvarenga da
xerostomia
salivary flow
orofacial pain
quantitative sensory testing
burning mouth syndrome
title_short The role of xerostomia in burning mouth syndrome: a case-control study
title_full The role of xerostomia in burning mouth syndrome: a case-control study
title_fullStr The role of xerostomia in burning mouth syndrome: a case-control study
title_full_unstemmed The role of xerostomia in burning mouth syndrome: a case-control study
title_sort The role of xerostomia in burning mouth syndrome: a case-control study
author Silva,Luciana Alvarenga da
author_facet Silva,Luciana Alvarenga da
Siqueira,José Tadeu Tesseroli de
Teixeira,Manoel Jacobsen
Siqueira,Silvia Regina Dowgan Tesseroli de
author_role author
author2 Siqueira,José Tadeu Tesseroli de
Teixeira,Manoel Jacobsen
Siqueira,Silvia Regina Dowgan Tesseroli de
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,Luciana Alvarenga da
Siqueira,José Tadeu Tesseroli de
Teixeira,Manoel Jacobsen
Siqueira,Silvia Regina Dowgan Tesseroli de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv xerostomia
salivary flow
orofacial pain
quantitative sensory testing
burning mouth syndrome
topic xerostomia
salivary flow
orofacial pain
quantitative sensory testing
burning mouth syndrome
description Objective : To assess the efficacy of anti-xerostomic topical medication (urea 10%) in patients with burning mouth syndrome (BMS). Method : Thirty-eight subjects diagnosed with BMS according to the International Association for the Study of Pain guidelines were randomized to either placebo (5% sodium carboxymethylcellulose, 0.15% methyl paraben, and 10% glycerol in distilled water qsp 100 g) or treatment (urea 10%) to be applied to the oral cavity 3-4 times per day for 3 months. The patients were evaluated before and after treatment with the following instruments: the EDOF-HC protocol (Orofacial Pain Clinic – Hospital das Clínicas), a xerostomia questionnaire, and quantitative sensory testing. Results : There were no differences in salivary flow or gustative, olfactory, or sensory thresholds (P>0.05). Fifteen (60%) patients reported improvement with the treatments (P=0.336). Conclusion : In conclusion, there were no differences between groups, and both exhibited an association between reported improvement and salivation.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2014000200091
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2014000200091
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0004-282X20130218
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.72 n.2 2014
reponame:Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
instname:Academia Brasileira de Neurologia
instacron:ABNEURO
instname_str Academia Brasileira de Neurologia
instacron_str ABNEURO
institution ABNEURO
reponame_str Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
collection Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Neurologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista.arquivos@abneuro.org
_version_ 1754212775875313664