Low specificity and sensitivity of smell identification testing for the diagnosis of Parkinson?s disease
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2014000100033 |
Resumo: | Objective: The aim of this study is to determine if the University of Pennsylvania’s Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is an accurate diagnostic tool for olfactory dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Method: We included 138 non-demented PD subjects and 175 control subjects matched by gender. Smell identification was tested using UPSIT. Results: The mean number of UPSIT items correctly identified by controls was 27.52±5.88; the mean score for PD subjects was 19.66±6.08 (p=<0.001). UPSIT sensitivity was 79.7% with a specificity of 68.5% using a cut-off score of ≤25. The overall accuracy for the diagnosis of PD was of 75.3%. Conclusion: UPSIT accuracy and specificity were lower than what has been previously reported. Our data demonstrates that 17.5% of items of the UPSIT were not well identified by healthy controls. Further research of the identification of a truly cross-cultural test is warranted. |
id |
ABNEURO-1_95ec57ec4e6d78d00b274df1e2a8a393 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0004-282X2014000100033 |
network_acronym_str |
ABNEURO-1 |
network_name_str |
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Low specificity and sensitivity of smell identification testing for the diagnosis of Parkinson?s diseaseParkinson?s diseaseUniversity of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Testolfactiondiagnostic test Objective: The aim of this study is to determine if the University of Pennsylvania’s Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is an accurate diagnostic tool for olfactory dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Method: We included 138 non-demented PD subjects and 175 control subjects matched by gender. Smell identification was tested using UPSIT. Results: The mean number of UPSIT items correctly identified by controls was 27.52±5.88; the mean score for PD subjects was 19.66±6.08 (p=<0.001). UPSIT sensitivity was 79.7% with a specificity of 68.5% using a cut-off score of ≤25. The overall accuracy for the diagnosis of PD was of 75.3%. Conclusion: UPSIT accuracy and specificity were lower than what has been previously reported. Our data demonstrates that 17.5% of items of the UPSIT were not well identified by healthy controls. Further research of the identification of a truly cross-cultural test is warranted. Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO2014-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2014000100033Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.72 n.1 2014reponame:Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)instname:Academia Brasileira de Neurologiainstacron:ABNEURO10.1590/0004-282X20130190info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRodríguez-Violante,MayelaGonzalez-Latapi,PaulinaCamacho-Ordoñez,AzyadehMartínez-Ramírez,DanielMorales-Briceño,HugoCervantes-Arriaga,Amineng2014-03-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0004-282X2014000100033Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/anphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista.arquivos@abneuro.org1678-42270004-282Xopendoar:2014-03-28T00:00Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Neurologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Low specificity and sensitivity of smell identification testing for the diagnosis of Parkinson?s disease |
title |
Low specificity and sensitivity of smell identification testing for the diagnosis of Parkinson?s disease |
spellingShingle |
Low specificity and sensitivity of smell identification testing for the diagnosis of Parkinson?s disease Rodríguez-Violante,Mayela Parkinson?s disease University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test olfaction diagnostic test |
title_short |
Low specificity and sensitivity of smell identification testing for the diagnosis of Parkinson?s disease |
title_full |
Low specificity and sensitivity of smell identification testing for the diagnosis of Parkinson?s disease |
title_fullStr |
Low specificity and sensitivity of smell identification testing for the diagnosis of Parkinson?s disease |
title_full_unstemmed |
Low specificity and sensitivity of smell identification testing for the diagnosis of Parkinson?s disease |
title_sort |
Low specificity and sensitivity of smell identification testing for the diagnosis of Parkinson?s disease |
author |
Rodríguez-Violante,Mayela |
author_facet |
Rodríguez-Violante,Mayela Gonzalez-Latapi,Paulina Camacho-Ordoñez,Azyadeh Martínez-Ramírez,Daniel Morales-Briceño,Hugo Cervantes-Arriaga,Amin |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gonzalez-Latapi,Paulina Camacho-Ordoñez,Azyadeh Martínez-Ramírez,Daniel Morales-Briceño,Hugo Cervantes-Arriaga,Amin |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodríguez-Violante,Mayela Gonzalez-Latapi,Paulina Camacho-Ordoñez,Azyadeh Martínez-Ramírez,Daniel Morales-Briceño,Hugo Cervantes-Arriaga,Amin |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Parkinson?s disease University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test olfaction diagnostic test |
topic |
Parkinson?s disease University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test olfaction diagnostic test |
description |
Objective: The aim of this study is to determine if the University of Pennsylvania’s Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is an accurate diagnostic tool for olfactory dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Method: We included 138 non-demented PD subjects and 175 control subjects matched by gender. Smell identification was tested using UPSIT. Results: The mean number of UPSIT items correctly identified by controls was 27.52±5.88; the mean score for PD subjects was 19.66±6.08 (p=<0.001). UPSIT sensitivity was 79.7% with a specificity of 68.5% using a cut-off score of ≤25. The overall accuracy for the diagnosis of PD was of 75.3%. Conclusion: UPSIT accuracy and specificity were lower than what has been previously reported. Our data demonstrates that 17.5% of items of the UPSIT were not well identified by healthy controls. Further research of the identification of a truly cross-cultural test is warranted. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2014000100033 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2014000100033 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0004-282X20130190 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.72 n.1 2014 reponame:Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) instname:Academia Brasileira de Neurologia instacron:ABNEURO |
instname_str |
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia |
instacron_str |
ABNEURO |
institution |
ABNEURO |
reponame_str |
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) |
collection |
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Neurologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revista.arquivos@abneuro.org |
_version_ |
1754212775815544832 |