Low specificity and sensitivity of smell identification testing for the diagnosis of Parkinson?s disease

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodríguez-Violante,Mayela
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Gonzalez-Latapi,Paulina, Camacho-Ordoñez,Azyadeh, Martínez-Ramírez,Daniel, Morales-Briceño,Hugo, Cervantes-Arriaga,Amin
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2014000100033
Resumo: Objective: The aim of this study is to determine if the University of Pennsylvania’s Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is an accurate diagnostic tool for olfactory dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Method: We included 138 non-demented PD subjects and 175 control subjects matched by gender. Smell identification was tested using UPSIT. Results: The mean number of UPSIT items correctly identified by controls was 27.52±5.88; the mean score for PD subjects was 19.66±6.08 (p=<0.001). UPSIT sensitivity was 79.7% with a specificity of 68.5% using a cut-off score of ≤25. The overall accuracy for the diagnosis of PD was of 75.3%. Conclusion: UPSIT accuracy and specificity were lower than what has been previously reported. Our data demonstrates that 17.5% of items of the UPSIT were not well identified by healthy controls. Further research of the identification of a truly cross-cultural test is warranted.
id ABNEURO-1_95ec57ec4e6d78d00b274df1e2a8a393
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0004-282X2014000100033
network_acronym_str ABNEURO-1
network_name_str Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Low specificity and sensitivity of smell identification testing for the diagnosis of Parkinson?s diseaseParkinson?s diseaseUniversity of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Testolfactiondiagnostic test Objective: The aim of this study is to determine if the University of Pennsylvania’s Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is an accurate diagnostic tool for olfactory dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Method: We included 138 non-demented PD subjects and 175 control subjects matched by gender. Smell identification was tested using UPSIT. Results: The mean number of UPSIT items correctly identified by controls was 27.52±5.88; the mean score for PD subjects was 19.66±6.08 (p=<0.001). UPSIT sensitivity was 79.7% with a specificity of 68.5% using a cut-off score of ≤25. The overall accuracy for the diagnosis of PD was of 75.3%. Conclusion: UPSIT accuracy and specificity were lower than what has been previously reported. Our data demonstrates that 17.5% of items of the UPSIT were not well identified by healthy controls. Further research of the identification of a truly cross-cultural test is warranted. Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO2014-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2014000100033Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.72 n.1 2014reponame:Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)instname:Academia Brasileira de Neurologiainstacron:ABNEURO10.1590/0004-282X20130190info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRodríguez-Violante,MayelaGonzalez-Latapi,PaulinaCamacho-Ordoñez,AzyadehMartínez-Ramírez,DanielMorales-Briceño,HugoCervantes-Arriaga,Amineng2014-03-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0004-282X2014000100033Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/anphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista.arquivos@abneuro.org1678-42270004-282Xopendoar:2014-03-28T00:00Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Neurologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Low specificity and sensitivity of smell identification testing for the diagnosis of Parkinson?s disease
title Low specificity and sensitivity of smell identification testing for the diagnosis of Parkinson?s disease
spellingShingle Low specificity and sensitivity of smell identification testing for the diagnosis of Parkinson?s disease
Rodríguez-Violante,Mayela
Parkinson?s disease
University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test
olfaction
diagnostic test
title_short Low specificity and sensitivity of smell identification testing for the diagnosis of Parkinson?s disease
title_full Low specificity and sensitivity of smell identification testing for the diagnosis of Parkinson?s disease
title_fullStr Low specificity and sensitivity of smell identification testing for the diagnosis of Parkinson?s disease
title_full_unstemmed Low specificity and sensitivity of smell identification testing for the diagnosis of Parkinson?s disease
title_sort Low specificity and sensitivity of smell identification testing for the diagnosis of Parkinson?s disease
author Rodríguez-Violante,Mayela
author_facet Rodríguez-Violante,Mayela
Gonzalez-Latapi,Paulina
Camacho-Ordoñez,Azyadeh
Martínez-Ramírez,Daniel
Morales-Briceño,Hugo
Cervantes-Arriaga,Amin
author_role author
author2 Gonzalez-Latapi,Paulina
Camacho-Ordoñez,Azyadeh
Martínez-Ramírez,Daniel
Morales-Briceño,Hugo
Cervantes-Arriaga,Amin
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodríguez-Violante,Mayela
Gonzalez-Latapi,Paulina
Camacho-Ordoñez,Azyadeh
Martínez-Ramírez,Daniel
Morales-Briceño,Hugo
Cervantes-Arriaga,Amin
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Parkinson?s disease
University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test
olfaction
diagnostic test
topic Parkinson?s disease
University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test
olfaction
diagnostic test
description Objective: The aim of this study is to determine if the University of Pennsylvania’s Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is an accurate diagnostic tool for olfactory dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Method: We included 138 non-demented PD subjects and 175 control subjects matched by gender. Smell identification was tested using UPSIT. Results: The mean number of UPSIT items correctly identified by controls was 27.52±5.88; the mean score for PD subjects was 19.66±6.08 (p=<0.001). UPSIT sensitivity was 79.7% with a specificity of 68.5% using a cut-off score of ≤25. The overall accuracy for the diagnosis of PD was of 75.3%. Conclusion: UPSIT accuracy and specificity were lower than what has been previously reported. Our data demonstrates that 17.5% of items of the UPSIT were not well identified by healthy controls. Further research of the identification of a truly cross-cultural test is warranted.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2014000100033
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2014000100033
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0004-282X20130190
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.72 n.1 2014
reponame:Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
instname:Academia Brasileira de Neurologia
instacron:ABNEURO
instname_str Academia Brasileira de Neurologia
instacron_str ABNEURO
institution ABNEURO
reponame_str Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
collection Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Neurologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista.arquivos@abneuro.org
_version_ 1754212775815544832