Ecological validity of the five digit test and the oral trails test
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2016000100029 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Tests evaluating the attentional-executive system are widely used in clinical practice. However, proximity of an objective cognitive test with real-world situations (ecological validity) is not frequently investigated. The present study evaluate the association between measures of the Five Digit Test (FDT) and the Oral Trails Test (OTT) with self-reported cognitive failures in everyday life as measured by the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ). Brazilian adults from 18-to-65 years old voluntarily performed the FDT and OTT tests and reported the frequency of cognitive failures in their everyday life through the CFQ. After controlling for the age effect, the measures of controlled attentional processes were associated with cognitive failures, yet the cognitive flexibility of both FDT and OTT accounted for by the majority of variance in most aspects of the CFQ factors. The FDT and the OTT measures were predictive of real-world problems such as cognitive failures in everyday activities/situations. |
id |
ABNEURO-1_f7f72c9e18d56c68f931fdbf9c49bf34 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0004-282X2016000100029 |
network_acronym_str |
ABNEURO-1 |
network_name_str |
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Ecological validity of the five digit test and the oral trails testneuropsychologyattentionpsychometricscognitionstroop testABSTRACT Tests evaluating the attentional-executive system are widely used in clinical practice. However, proximity of an objective cognitive test with real-world situations (ecological validity) is not frequently investigated. The present study evaluate the association between measures of the Five Digit Test (FDT) and the Oral Trails Test (OTT) with self-reported cognitive failures in everyday life as measured by the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ). Brazilian adults from 18-to-65 years old voluntarily performed the FDT and OTT tests and reported the frequency of cognitive failures in their everyday life through the CFQ. After controlling for the age effect, the measures of controlled attentional processes were associated with cognitive failures, yet the cognitive flexibility of both FDT and OTT accounted for by the majority of variance in most aspects of the CFQ factors. The FDT and the OTT measures were predictive of real-world problems such as cognitive failures in everyday activities/situations.Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2016000100029Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.74 n.1 2016reponame:Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)instname:Academia Brasileira de Neurologiainstacron:ABNEURO10.1590/0004-282X20150184info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPaiva,Gabrielle Chequer de CastroFialho,Mariana BragaCosta,Danielle de SouzaPaula,Jonas Jardim deeng2016-02-05T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0004-282X2016000100029Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/anphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista.arquivos@abneuro.org1678-42270004-282Xopendoar:2016-02-05T00:00Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Neurologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ecological validity of the five digit test and the oral trails test |
title |
Ecological validity of the five digit test and the oral trails test |
spellingShingle |
Ecological validity of the five digit test and the oral trails test Paiva,Gabrielle Chequer de Castro neuropsychology attention psychometrics cognition stroop test |
title_short |
Ecological validity of the five digit test and the oral trails test |
title_full |
Ecological validity of the five digit test and the oral trails test |
title_fullStr |
Ecological validity of the five digit test and the oral trails test |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ecological validity of the five digit test and the oral trails test |
title_sort |
Ecological validity of the five digit test and the oral trails test |
author |
Paiva,Gabrielle Chequer de Castro |
author_facet |
Paiva,Gabrielle Chequer de Castro Fialho,Mariana Braga Costa,Danielle de Souza Paula,Jonas Jardim de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fialho,Mariana Braga Costa,Danielle de Souza Paula,Jonas Jardim de |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Paiva,Gabrielle Chequer de Castro Fialho,Mariana Braga Costa,Danielle de Souza Paula,Jonas Jardim de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
neuropsychology attention psychometrics cognition stroop test |
topic |
neuropsychology attention psychometrics cognition stroop test |
description |
ABSTRACT Tests evaluating the attentional-executive system are widely used in clinical practice. However, proximity of an objective cognitive test with real-world situations (ecological validity) is not frequently investigated. The present study evaluate the association between measures of the Five Digit Test (FDT) and the Oral Trails Test (OTT) with self-reported cognitive failures in everyday life as measured by the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ). Brazilian adults from 18-to-65 years old voluntarily performed the FDT and OTT tests and reported the frequency of cognitive failures in their everyday life through the CFQ. After controlling for the age effect, the measures of controlled attentional processes were associated with cognitive failures, yet the cognitive flexibility of both FDT and OTT accounted for by the majority of variance in most aspects of the CFQ factors. The FDT and the OTT measures were predictive of real-world problems such as cognitive failures in everyday activities/situations. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2016000100029 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2016000100029 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0004-282X20150184 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.74 n.1 2016 reponame:Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) instname:Academia Brasileira de Neurologia instacron:ABNEURO |
instname_str |
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia |
instacron_str |
ABNEURO |
institution |
ABNEURO |
reponame_str |
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) |
collection |
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Neurologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revista.arquivos@abneuro.org |
_version_ |
1754212779594612736 |