Evaluation of surface roughness of three temporary resins submittted in different methods of polishing
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Odontologia |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/385 |
Resumo: | The provisional restorations are extremely important because they anticipate the definitive treatment. The smoothness of those restorations should get closer to reality to provide periodontal health. This study aims to verify the roughness on different methods of polishing on three brands of acrylic resins. Ninety specimens were made and these were divided into nine groups. Each resin tested was given a control group. From the data obtained by descriptive statistics, were tested within groups. Statistical inference was made by two-tailed tests. Results: we concluded that the resin Classic thermicpolymerized allows a better polish when compared with Luxatemp® Bis-Acryl resins and Dencor® thermoactivated respectively and mecanical polishing was more effective than chemical ones the three types of resin. |
id |
ABO-1_5b412bd30413970a5449b09cee4f3f14 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revista_aborj_org_br.www.revista.aborj.org.br:article/385 |
network_acronym_str |
ABO-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of surface roughness of three temporary resins submittted in different methods of polishingAvaliação da rugosidade superficial de três resinas acrílicas para restauração provisória submetidas a diferentes métodos de polimentoPrótese Dentária (Odontologia)Restauração dentária temporária; Polimento dentário; Resinas acrílicasThe provisional restorations are extremely important because they anticipate the definitive treatment. The smoothness of those restorations should get closer to reality to provide periodontal health. This study aims to verify the roughness on different methods of polishing on three brands of acrylic resins. Ninety specimens were made and these were divided into nine groups. Each resin tested was given a control group. From the data obtained by descriptive statistics, were tested within groups. Statistical inference was made by two-tailed tests. Results: we concluded that the resin Classic thermicpolymerized allows a better polish when compared with Luxatemp® Bis-Acryl resins and Dencor® thermoactivated respectively and mecanical polishing was more effective than chemical ones the three types of resin.A lisura das restaurações provisórias proporciona saúde ao periodonto. O presente trabalho teve por objetivo verificar a rugosidade diante de diferentes métodos de polimento sobre três marcas comerciais de resinas acrílicas. Foram confeccionados 90 corpos de prova (cp) e estes foram divididos em seis grupos experimentais e três grupos controle. Para cada resina testada foi determinado um grupo controle, um grupo com polimento mecânico e outro com polimento químico. De acordo com os resultados obtidos, pôde-se concluir que a resina Clássico (termopolimerizável) permite um melhor polimento quando comparada às resinas bisacrílicas e à resina autoativada, respectivamente, e o polimento mecânico diante do químico mostrou-se mais efetivo nos três tipos de resina.Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro2014-05-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Empírica de Campoapplication/pdfhttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/38510.18363/rbo.v70n2.p.152Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 70, n. 2 (2013); 152Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 70, n. 2 (2013); 1521984-3747reponame:Revista Brasileira de Odontologiainstname:Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)instacron:ABOporhttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/385/381Rio de Janeiro; Brasil; América LatinaContempôraneatipos de resina acrílica utilizadas para restaurações provisóriasDireitos autorais 2016 Revistasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGranha, DeboraMontenegro, Alexandre CamposDuarte, João Luiz Portella2014-06-06T14:34:44Zoai:revista_aborj_org_br.www.revista.aborj.org.br:article/385Revistahttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rboONGhttp://www.revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oaihttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oai0034-72721984-3747opendoar:2014-06-06T14:34:44Revista Brasileira de Odontologia - Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of surface roughness of three temporary resins submittted in different methods of polishing Avaliação da rugosidade superficial de três resinas acrílicas para restauração provisória submetidas a diferentes métodos de polimento |
title |
Evaluation of surface roughness of three temporary resins submittted in different methods of polishing |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of surface roughness of three temporary resins submittted in different methods of polishing Granha, Debora Prótese Dentária (Odontologia) Restauração dentária temporária; Polimento dentário; Resinas acrílicas |
title_short |
Evaluation of surface roughness of three temporary resins submittted in different methods of polishing |
title_full |
Evaluation of surface roughness of three temporary resins submittted in different methods of polishing |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of surface roughness of three temporary resins submittted in different methods of polishing |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of surface roughness of three temporary resins submittted in different methods of polishing |
title_sort |
Evaluation of surface roughness of three temporary resins submittted in different methods of polishing |
author |
Granha, Debora |
author_facet |
Granha, Debora Montenegro, Alexandre Campos Duarte, João Luiz Portella |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Montenegro, Alexandre Campos Duarte, João Luiz Portella |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Granha, Debora Montenegro, Alexandre Campos Duarte, João Luiz Portella |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Prótese Dentária (Odontologia) Restauração dentária temporária; Polimento dentário; Resinas acrílicas |
topic |
Prótese Dentária (Odontologia) Restauração dentária temporária; Polimento dentário; Resinas acrílicas |
description |
The provisional restorations are extremely important because they anticipate the definitive treatment. The smoothness of those restorations should get closer to reality to provide periodontal health. This study aims to verify the roughness on different methods of polishing on three brands of acrylic resins. Ninety specimens were made and these were divided into nine groups. Each resin tested was given a control group. From the data obtained by descriptive statistics, were tested within groups. Statistical inference was made by two-tailed tests. Results: we concluded that the resin Classic thermicpolymerized allows a better polish when compared with Luxatemp® Bis-Acryl resins and Dencor® thermoactivated respectively and mecanical polishing was more effective than chemical ones the three types of resin. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-05-28 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa Empírica de Campo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/385 10.18363/rbo.v70n2.p.152 |
url |
https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/385 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18363/rbo.v70n2.p.152 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/385/381 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Revistas info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Revistas |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Rio de Janeiro; Brasil; América Latina Contempôranea tipos de resina acrílica utilizadas para restaurações provisórias |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 70, n. 2 (2013); 152 Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 70, n. 2 (2013); 152 1984-3747 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Odontologia instname:Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO) instacron:ABO |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO) |
instacron_str |
ABO |
institution |
ABO |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia - Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oai |
_version_ |
1798313203909787648 |