Cholesteatoma labyrinthine fistula: prevalence and impact

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rosito,Letícia P. Schmidt
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Canali,Inesângela, Teixeira,Adriane, Silva,Mauricio Noschang, Selaimen,Fábio, Costa,Sady Selaimen da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-86942019000200222
Resumo: Abstract Introduction: Labyrinthine fistula is one of the most common complications associated with cholesteatoma. It represents an erosive loss of the endochondral bone overlying the labyrinth. Reasons for cholesteatoma-induced labyrinthine fistula are still poorly understood. Objective: Evaluate patients with cholesteatoma, in order to identify possible risk factors or clinical findings associated with labyrinthine fistula. Secondary objectives were to determine the prevalence of labyrinthine fistula in the study cohort, to analyze the role of computed tomography and to describe the hearing results after surgery. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with an acquired middle ear cholesteatoma in at least one ear with no prior surgery, who underwent audiometry and tomographic examination of the ears or surgery at our institution. Hearing results after surgery were analyzed according to the labyrinthine fistula classification and the employed technique. Results: We analyzed a total of 333 patients, of which 9 (2.7%) had labyrinthine fistula in the lateral semicircular canal. In 8 patients, the fistula was first identified on image studies and confirmed at surgery. In patients with posterior epitympanic and two-route cholesteatomas, the prevalence was 5.0%; and in cases with remaining cholesteatoma growth patterns, the prevalence was 0.6% (p = 0.16). In addition, the prevalence ratio for labyrinthine fistula between patients with and without vertigo was 2.1. Of patients without sensorineural hearing loss before surgery, 80.0% remained with the same bone conduction thresholds, whereas 20.0% progressed to profound hearing loss. Of patients with sensorineural hearing loss before surgery, 33.33% remained with the same hearing impairment, whereas 33.33% showed improvement of the bone conduction thresholds' Pure Tone Average. Conclusion: Labyrinthine fistula must be ruled out prior to ear surgery, particularly in cases of posterior epitympanic or two-route cholesteatoma. Computed tomography is a good diagnostic modality for lateral semicircular canal fistula. Sensorineural hearing loss can occur post-surgically, even in previously unaffected patients despite the technique employed.
id ABORL-F-1_f10ab63452e20918312cb1e9ce4eacfb
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1808-86942019000200222
network_acronym_str ABORL-F-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
repository_id_str
spelling Cholesteatoma labyrinthine fistula: prevalence and impactLabyrinthine fistulaCholesteatomaHearing lossAbstract Introduction: Labyrinthine fistula is one of the most common complications associated with cholesteatoma. It represents an erosive loss of the endochondral bone overlying the labyrinth. Reasons for cholesteatoma-induced labyrinthine fistula are still poorly understood. Objective: Evaluate patients with cholesteatoma, in order to identify possible risk factors or clinical findings associated with labyrinthine fistula. Secondary objectives were to determine the prevalence of labyrinthine fistula in the study cohort, to analyze the role of computed tomography and to describe the hearing results after surgery. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with an acquired middle ear cholesteatoma in at least one ear with no prior surgery, who underwent audiometry and tomographic examination of the ears or surgery at our institution. Hearing results after surgery were analyzed according to the labyrinthine fistula classification and the employed technique. Results: We analyzed a total of 333 patients, of which 9 (2.7%) had labyrinthine fistula in the lateral semicircular canal. In 8 patients, the fistula was first identified on image studies and confirmed at surgery. In patients with posterior epitympanic and two-route cholesteatomas, the prevalence was 5.0%; and in cases with remaining cholesteatoma growth patterns, the prevalence was 0.6% (p = 0.16). In addition, the prevalence ratio for labyrinthine fistula between patients with and without vertigo was 2.1. Of patients without sensorineural hearing loss before surgery, 80.0% remained with the same bone conduction thresholds, whereas 20.0% progressed to profound hearing loss. Of patients with sensorineural hearing loss before surgery, 33.33% remained with the same hearing impairment, whereas 33.33% showed improvement of the bone conduction thresholds' Pure Tone Average. Conclusion: Labyrinthine fistula must be ruled out prior to ear surgery, particularly in cases of posterior epitympanic or two-route cholesteatoma. Computed tomography is a good diagnostic modality for lateral semicircular canal fistula. Sensorineural hearing loss can occur post-surgically, even in previously unaffected patients despite the technique employed.Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial.2019-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-86942019000200222Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology v.85 n.2 2019reponame:Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngologyinstname:Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF)instacron:ABORL-CCF10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.01.005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRosito,Letícia P. SchmidtCanali,InesângelaTeixeira,AdrianeSilva,Mauricio NoschangSelaimen,FábioCosta,Sady Selaimen daeng2019-04-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-86942019000200222Revistahttp://www.bjorl.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevista@aborlccf.org.br||revista@aborlccf.org.br1808-86861808-8686opendoar:2019-04-24T00:00Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cholesteatoma labyrinthine fistula: prevalence and impact
title Cholesteatoma labyrinthine fistula: prevalence and impact
spellingShingle Cholesteatoma labyrinthine fistula: prevalence and impact
Rosito,Letícia P. Schmidt
Labyrinthine fistula
Cholesteatoma
Hearing loss
title_short Cholesteatoma labyrinthine fistula: prevalence and impact
title_full Cholesteatoma labyrinthine fistula: prevalence and impact
title_fullStr Cholesteatoma labyrinthine fistula: prevalence and impact
title_full_unstemmed Cholesteatoma labyrinthine fistula: prevalence and impact
title_sort Cholesteatoma labyrinthine fistula: prevalence and impact
author Rosito,Letícia P. Schmidt
author_facet Rosito,Letícia P. Schmidt
Canali,Inesângela
Teixeira,Adriane
Silva,Mauricio Noschang
Selaimen,Fábio
Costa,Sady Selaimen da
author_role author
author2 Canali,Inesângela
Teixeira,Adriane
Silva,Mauricio Noschang
Selaimen,Fábio
Costa,Sady Selaimen da
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rosito,Letícia P. Schmidt
Canali,Inesângela
Teixeira,Adriane
Silva,Mauricio Noschang
Selaimen,Fábio
Costa,Sady Selaimen da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Labyrinthine fistula
Cholesteatoma
Hearing loss
topic Labyrinthine fistula
Cholesteatoma
Hearing loss
description Abstract Introduction: Labyrinthine fistula is one of the most common complications associated with cholesteatoma. It represents an erosive loss of the endochondral bone overlying the labyrinth. Reasons for cholesteatoma-induced labyrinthine fistula are still poorly understood. Objective: Evaluate patients with cholesteatoma, in order to identify possible risk factors or clinical findings associated with labyrinthine fistula. Secondary objectives were to determine the prevalence of labyrinthine fistula in the study cohort, to analyze the role of computed tomography and to describe the hearing results after surgery. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with an acquired middle ear cholesteatoma in at least one ear with no prior surgery, who underwent audiometry and tomographic examination of the ears or surgery at our institution. Hearing results after surgery were analyzed according to the labyrinthine fistula classification and the employed technique. Results: We analyzed a total of 333 patients, of which 9 (2.7%) had labyrinthine fistula in the lateral semicircular canal. In 8 patients, the fistula was first identified on image studies and confirmed at surgery. In patients with posterior epitympanic and two-route cholesteatomas, the prevalence was 5.0%; and in cases with remaining cholesteatoma growth patterns, the prevalence was 0.6% (p = 0.16). In addition, the prevalence ratio for labyrinthine fistula between patients with and without vertigo was 2.1. Of patients without sensorineural hearing loss before surgery, 80.0% remained with the same bone conduction thresholds, whereas 20.0% progressed to profound hearing loss. Of patients with sensorineural hearing loss before surgery, 33.33% remained with the same hearing impairment, whereas 33.33% showed improvement of the bone conduction thresholds' Pure Tone Average. Conclusion: Labyrinthine fistula must be ruled out prior to ear surgery, particularly in cases of posterior epitympanic or two-route cholesteatoma. Computed tomography is a good diagnostic modality for lateral semicircular canal fistula. Sensorineural hearing loss can occur post-surgically, even in previously unaffected patients despite the technique employed.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-86942019000200222
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-86942019000200222
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.01.005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology v.85 n.2 2019
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
instname:Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF)
instacron:ABORL-CCF
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF)
instacron_str ABORL-CCF
institution ABORL-CCF
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
collection Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@aborlccf.org.br||revista@aborlccf.org.br
_version_ 1754575993547259904