Mild cognitive impairment: cognitive screening or neuropsychological assessment?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Diniz,Breno Satler
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Nunes,Paula Villela, Yassuda,Monica S, Pereira,Fernanda S, Flaks,Mariana K, Viola,Luciane F, Radanovic,Marcia, Abreu,Izabella Dutra de, Borelli,Danilo T, Gattaz,Wagner F, Forlenza,Orestes Vicente
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462008000400003
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To describe the neuropsychological profile of mild cognitive impairment subtypes (amnestic, non-amnestic and multiple-domain) of a clinical sample. We further address the diagnostic properties of the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Cambridge Cognitive Examination for the identification of the different mild cognitive impairment subtypes in clinical practice. METHOD: Cross-sectional clinical and neuropsychological evaluation of 249 elderly patients attending a memory clinic at a university hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil. RESULTS: The performance of patients with mild cognitive impairment was heterogeneous across the different subtests of the neuropsychological battery, with a trend towards an overall worse performance for amnestic (particularly multiple domain) mild cognitive impairment as compared to non-amnestic subtypes. Screening tests for dementia (Mini-Mental State Examination and Cambridge Cognitive Examination) adequately discriminated cases of mild Alzheimer's disease from controls, but they were not accurate to discriminate patients with mild cognitive impairment (all subtypes) from control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The discrimination of mild cognitive impairment subtypes was possible only with the aid of a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. It is necessary to develop new strategies for mild cognitive impairment screening in clinical practice.
id ABP-1_33807f11034682cbf02684f6a9c0da9c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-44462008000400003
network_acronym_str ABP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Mild cognitive impairment: cognitive screening or neuropsychological assessment?Cognition disorderAlzheimer diseaseNeuropsychological testsDiagnosisDementiaOBJECTIVE: To describe the neuropsychological profile of mild cognitive impairment subtypes (amnestic, non-amnestic and multiple-domain) of a clinical sample. We further address the diagnostic properties of the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Cambridge Cognitive Examination for the identification of the different mild cognitive impairment subtypes in clinical practice. METHOD: Cross-sectional clinical and neuropsychological evaluation of 249 elderly patients attending a memory clinic at a university hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil. RESULTS: The performance of patients with mild cognitive impairment was heterogeneous across the different subtests of the neuropsychological battery, with a trend towards an overall worse performance for amnestic (particularly multiple domain) mild cognitive impairment as compared to non-amnestic subtypes. Screening tests for dementia (Mini-Mental State Examination and Cambridge Cognitive Examination) adequately discriminated cases of mild Alzheimer's disease from controls, but they were not accurate to discriminate patients with mild cognitive impairment (all subtypes) from control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The discrimination of mild cognitive impairment subtypes was possible only with the aid of a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. It is necessary to develop new strategies for mild cognitive impairment screening in clinical practice.Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria2008-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462008000400003Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry v.30 n.4 2008reponame:Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)instacron:ABP10.1590/S1516-44462008000400003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDiniz,Breno SatlerNunes,Paula VillelaYassuda,Monica SPereira,Fernanda SFlaks,Mariana KViola,Luciane FRadanovic,MarciaAbreu,Izabella Dutra deBorelli,Danilo TGattaz,Wagner FForlenza,Orestes Vicenteeng2008-12-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-44462008000400003Revistahttp://www.bjp.org.br/ahead_of_print.asphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbp@abpbrasil.org.br1809-452X1516-4446opendoar:2008-12-17T00:00Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) - Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mild cognitive impairment: cognitive screening or neuropsychological assessment?
title Mild cognitive impairment: cognitive screening or neuropsychological assessment?
spellingShingle Mild cognitive impairment: cognitive screening or neuropsychological assessment?
Diniz,Breno Satler
Cognition disorder
Alzheimer disease
Neuropsychological tests
Diagnosis
Dementia
title_short Mild cognitive impairment: cognitive screening or neuropsychological assessment?
title_full Mild cognitive impairment: cognitive screening or neuropsychological assessment?
title_fullStr Mild cognitive impairment: cognitive screening or neuropsychological assessment?
title_full_unstemmed Mild cognitive impairment: cognitive screening or neuropsychological assessment?
title_sort Mild cognitive impairment: cognitive screening or neuropsychological assessment?
author Diniz,Breno Satler
author_facet Diniz,Breno Satler
Nunes,Paula Villela
Yassuda,Monica S
Pereira,Fernanda S
Flaks,Mariana K
Viola,Luciane F
Radanovic,Marcia
Abreu,Izabella Dutra de
Borelli,Danilo T
Gattaz,Wagner F
Forlenza,Orestes Vicente
author_role author
author2 Nunes,Paula Villela
Yassuda,Monica S
Pereira,Fernanda S
Flaks,Mariana K
Viola,Luciane F
Radanovic,Marcia
Abreu,Izabella Dutra de
Borelli,Danilo T
Gattaz,Wagner F
Forlenza,Orestes Vicente
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Diniz,Breno Satler
Nunes,Paula Villela
Yassuda,Monica S
Pereira,Fernanda S
Flaks,Mariana K
Viola,Luciane F
Radanovic,Marcia
Abreu,Izabella Dutra de
Borelli,Danilo T
Gattaz,Wagner F
Forlenza,Orestes Vicente
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cognition disorder
Alzheimer disease
Neuropsychological tests
Diagnosis
Dementia
topic Cognition disorder
Alzheimer disease
Neuropsychological tests
Diagnosis
Dementia
description OBJECTIVE: To describe the neuropsychological profile of mild cognitive impairment subtypes (amnestic, non-amnestic and multiple-domain) of a clinical sample. We further address the diagnostic properties of the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Cambridge Cognitive Examination for the identification of the different mild cognitive impairment subtypes in clinical practice. METHOD: Cross-sectional clinical and neuropsychological evaluation of 249 elderly patients attending a memory clinic at a university hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil. RESULTS: The performance of patients with mild cognitive impairment was heterogeneous across the different subtests of the neuropsychological battery, with a trend towards an overall worse performance for amnestic (particularly multiple domain) mild cognitive impairment as compared to non-amnestic subtypes. Screening tests for dementia (Mini-Mental State Examination and Cambridge Cognitive Examination) adequately discriminated cases of mild Alzheimer's disease from controls, but they were not accurate to discriminate patients with mild cognitive impairment (all subtypes) from control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The discrimination of mild cognitive impairment subtypes was possible only with the aid of a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. It is necessary to develop new strategies for mild cognitive impairment screening in clinical practice.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462008000400003
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462008000400003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1516-44462008000400003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry v.30 n.4 2008
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)
instacron:ABP
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)
instacron_str ABP
institution ABP
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) - Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbp@abpbrasil.org.br
_version_ 1754212554252484608