Mild cognitive impairment: cognitive screening or neuropsychological assessment?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462008000400003 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To describe the neuropsychological profile of mild cognitive impairment subtypes (amnestic, non-amnestic and multiple-domain) of a clinical sample. We further address the diagnostic properties of the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Cambridge Cognitive Examination for the identification of the different mild cognitive impairment subtypes in clinical practice. METHOD: Cross-sectional clinical and neuropsychological evaluation of 249 elderly patients attending a memory clinic at a university hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil. RESULTS: The performance of patients with mild cognitive impairment was heterogeneous across the different subtests of the neuropsychological battery, with a trend towards an overall worse performance for amnestic (particularly multiple domain) mild cognitive impairment as compared to non-amnestic subtypes. Screening tests for dementia (Mini-Mental State Examination and Cambridge Cognitive Examination) adequately discriminated cases of mild Alzheimer's disease from controls, but they were not accurate to discriminate patients with mild cognitive impairment (all subtypes) from control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The discrimination of mild cognitive impairment subtypes was possible only with the aid of a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. It is necessary to develop new strategies for mild cognitive impairment screening in clinical practice. |
id |
ABP-1_33807f11034682cbf02684f6a9c0da9c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-44462008000400003 |
network_acronym_str |
ABP-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Mild cognitive impairment: cognitive screening or neuropsychological assessment?Cognition disorderAlzheimer diseaseNeuropsychological testsDiagnosisDementiaOBJECTIVE: To describe the neuropsychological profile of mild cognitive impairment subtypes (amnestic, non-amnestic and multiple-domain) of a clinical sample. We further address the diagnostic properties of the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Cambridge Cognitive Examination for the identification of the different mild cognitive impairment subtypes in clinical practice. METHOD: Cross-sectional clinical and neuropsychological evaluation of 249 elderly patients attending a memory clinic at a university hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil. RESULTS: The performance of patients with mild cognitive impairment was heterogeneous across the different subtests of the neuropsychological battery, with a trend towards an overall worse performance for amnestic (particularly multiple domain) mild cognitive impairment as compared to non-amnestic subtypes. Screening tests for dementia (Mini-Mental State Examination and Cambridge Cognitive Examination) adequately discriminated cases of mild Alzheimer's disease from controls, but they were not accurate to discriminate patients with mild cognitive impairment (all subtypes) from control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The discrimination of mild cognitive impairment subtypes was possible only with the aid of a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. It is necessary to develop new strategies for mild cognitive impairment screening in clinical practice.Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria2008-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462008000400003Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry v.30 n.4 2008reponame:Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)instacron:ABP10.1590/S1516-44462008000400003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDiniz,Breno SatlerNunes,Paula VillelaYassuda,Monica SPereira,Fernanda SFlaks,Mariana KViola,Luciane FRadanovic,MarciaAbreu,Izabella Dutra deBorelli,Danilo TGattaz,Wagner FForlenza,Orestes Vicenteeng2008-12-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-44462008000400003Revistahttp://www.bjp.org.br/ahead_of_print.asphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbp@abpbrasil.org.br1809-452X1516-4446opendoar:2008-12-17T00:00Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) - Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Mild cognitive impairment: cognitive screening or neuropsychological assessment? |
title |
Mild cognitive impairment: cognitive screening or neuropsychological assessment? |
spellingShingle |
Mild cognitive impairment: cognitive screening or neuropsychological assessment? Diniz,Breno Satler Cognition disorder Alzheimer disease Neuropsychological tests Diagnosis Dementia |
title_short |
Mild cognitive impairment: cognitive screening or neuropsychological assessment? |
title_full |
Mild cognitive impairment: cognitive screening or neuropsychological assessment? |
title_fullStr |
Mild cognitive impairment: cognitive screening or neuropsychological assessment? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mild cognitive impairment: cognitive screening or neuropsychological assessment? |
title_sort |
Mild cognitive impairment: cognitive screening or neuropsychological assessment? |
author |
Diniz,Breno Satler |
author_facet |
Diniz,Breno Satler Nunes,Paula Villela Yassuda,Monica S Pereira,Fernanda S Flaks,Mariana K Viola,Luciane F Radanovic,Marcia Abreu,Izabella Dutra de Borelli,Danilo T Gattaz,Wagner F Forlenza,Orestes Vicente |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nunes,Paula Villela Yassuda,Monica S Pereira,Fernanda S Flaks,Mariana K Viola,Luciane F Radanovic,Marcia Abreu,Izabella Dutra de Borelli,Danilo T Gattaz,Wagner F Forlenza,Orestes Vicente |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Diniz,Breno Satler Nunes,Paula Villela Yassuda,Monica S Pereira,Fernanda S Flaks,Mariana K Viola,Luciane F Radanovic,Marcia Abreu,Izabella Dutra de Borelli,Danilo T Gattaz,Wagner F Forlenza,Orestes Vicente |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cognition disorder Alzheimer disease Neuropsychological tests Diagnosis Dementia |
topic |
Cognition disorder Alzheimer disease Neuropsychological tests Diagnosis Dementia |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To describe the neuropsychological profile of mild cognitive impairment subtypes (amnestic, non-amnestic and multiple-domain) of a clinical sample. We further address the diagnostic properties of the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Cambridge Cognitive Examination for the identification of the different mild cognitive impairment subtypes in clinical practice. METHOD: Cross-sectional clinical and neuropsychological evaluation of 249 elderly patients attending a memory clinic at a university hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil. RESULTS: The performance of patients with mild cognitive impairment was heterogeneous across the different subtests of the neuropsychological battery, with a trend towards an overall worse performance for amnestic (particularly multiple domain) mild cognitive impairment as compared to non-amnestic subtypes. Screening tests for dementia (Mini-Mental State Examination and Cambridge Cognitive Examination) adequately discriminated cases of mild Alzheimer's disease from controls, but they were not accurate to discriminate patients with mild cognitive impairment (all subtypes) from control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The discrimination of mild cognitive impairment subtypes was possible only with the aid of a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. It is necessary to develop new strategies for mild cognitive impairment screening in clinical practice. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462008000400003 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462008000400003 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1516-44462008000400003 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry v.30 n.4 2008 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP) instacron:ABP |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP) |
instacron_str |
ABP |
institution |
ABP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) - Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbp@abpbrasil.org.br |
_version_ |
1754212554252484608 |