Screening for common mental disorders using the SRQ-20 in Brazil: what are the alternative strategies for analysis?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462018000200115 |
Resumo: | Objective: To analyze the prevalence of common mental disorders (CMD) assessed with the Self Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20), using the established cutoff point, and comparing it with the results of a joint correspondence factor analysis (CFA) and cluster analysis and of a latent class analysis (LCA). Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in an urban sample of 1,095 women aged 19 to 55 years. Joint CFA-cluster analysis and LCA were used. Results: We found a high prevalence of CMD, regardless of classification method (37.6% when using the cutoff point; 44.4% and 52% for LCA and joint CFA-cluster, respectively). The alternative analysis strategies describe the cases more efficiently when compared to the traditional cutoff method, especially regarding more severe symptoms. Both alternative strategies also provide a description of the SRQ-20 dimensions in their particularities, which may be useful for the planning and implementation of specific actions in a given population. Conclusion: The SRQ-20 cutoff point seems to underestimate the magnitude of CMD among women. The alternative methods of analysis presented herein highlight the different possibilities of using this important instrument of screening for mental health. |
id |
ABP-1_77a9b80491d7073b548ead91e741caa6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-44462018000200115 |
network_acronym_str |
ABP-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Screening for common mental disorders using the SRQ-20 in Brazil: what are the alternative strategies for analysis?Screeningmental healthmultivariate analysislatent class analysiscorrespondence analysis Objective: To analyze the prevalence of common mental disorders (CMD) assessed with the Self Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20), using the established cutoff point, and comparing it with the results of a joint correspondence factor analysis (CFA) and cluster analysis and of a latent class analysis (LCA). Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in an urban sample of 1,095 women aged 19 to 55 years. Joint CFA-cluster analysis and LCA were used. Results: We found a high prevalence of CMD, regardless of classification method (37.6% when using the cutoff point; 44.4% and 52% for LCA and joint CFA-cluster, respectively). The alternative analysis strategies describe the cases more efficiently when compared to the traditional cutoff method, especially regarding more severe symptoms. Both alternative strategies also provide a description of the SRQ-20 dimensions in their particularities, which may be useful for the planning and implementation of specific actions in a given population. Conclusion: The SRQ-20 cutoff point seems to underestimate the magnitude of CMD among women. The alternative methods of analysis presented herein highlight the different possibilities of using this important instrument of screening for mental health.Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria2018-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462018000200115Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry v.40 n.2 2018reponame:Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)instacron:ABP10.1590/1516-4446-2016-2139info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarreto do Carmo,Maria B.Santos,Leticia M. dosFeitosa,Caroline A.Fiaccone,Rosemeire L.Silva,Nívea B. daSantos,Darci N. dosBarreto,Maurício L.Amorim,Leila D.eng2018-05-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-44462018000200115Revistahttp://www.bjp.org.br/ahead_of_print.asphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbp@abpbrasil.org.br1809-452X1516-4446opendoar:2018-05-28T00:00Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) - Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Screening for common mental disorders using the SRQ-20 in Brazil: what are the alternative strategies for analysis? |
title |
Screening for common mental disorders using the SRQ-20 in Brazil: what are the alternative strategies for analysis? |
spellingShingle |
Screening for common mental disorders using the SRQ-20 in Brazil: what are the alternative strategies for analysis? Barreto do Carmo,Maria B. Screening mental health multivariate analysis latent class analysis correspondence analysis |
title_short |
Screening for common mental disorders using the SRQ-20 in Brazil: what are the alternative strategies for analysis? |
title_full |
Screening for common mental disorders using the SRQ-20 in Brazil: what are the alternative strategies for analysis? |
title_fullStr |
Screening for common mental disorders using the SRQ-20 in Brazil: what are the alternative strategies for analysis? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Screening for common mental disorders using the SRQ-20 in Brazil: what are the alternative strategies for analysis? |
title_sort |
Screening for common mental disorders using the SRQ-20 in Brazil: what are the alternative strategies for analysis? |
author |
Barreto do Carmo,Maria B. |
author_facet |
Barreto do Carmo,Maria B. Santos,Leticia M. dos Feitosa,Caroline A. Fiaccone,Rosemeire L. Silva,Nívea B. da Santos,Darci N. dos Barreto,Maurício L. Amorim,Leila D. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santos,Leticia M. dos Feitosa,Caroline A. Fiaccone,Rosemeire L. Silva,Nívea B. da Santos,Darci N. dos Barreto,Maurício L. Amorim,Leila D. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Barreto do Carmo,Maria B. Santos,Leticia M. dos Feitosa,Caroline A. Fiaccone,Rosemeire L. Silva,Nívea B. da Santos,Darci N. dos Barreto,Maurício L. Amorim,Leila D. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Screening mental health multivariate analysis latent class analysis correspondence analysis |
topic |
Screening mental health multivariate analysis latent class analysis correspondence analysis |
description |
Objective: To analyze the prevalence of common mental disorders (CMD) assessed with the Self Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20), using the established cutoff point, and comparing it with the results of a joint correspondence factor analysis (CFA) and cluster analysis and of a latent class analysis (LCA). Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in an urban sample of 1,095 women aged 19 to 55 years. Joint CFA-cluster analysis and LCA were used. Results: We found a high prevalence of CMD, regardless of classification method (37.6% when using the cutoff point; 44.4% and 52% for LCA and joint CFA-cluster, respectively). The alternative analysis strategies describe the cases more efficiently when compared to the traditional cutoff method, especially regarding more severe symptoms. Both alternative strategies also provide a description of the SRQ-20 dimensions in their particularities, which may be useful for the planning and implementation of specific actions in a given population. Conclusion: The SRQ-20 cutoff point seems to underestimate the magnitude of CMD among women. The alternative methods of analysis presented herein highlight the different possibilities of using this important instrument of screening for mental health. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462018000200115 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462018000200115 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1516-4446-2016-2139 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry v.40 n.2 2018 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP) instacron:ABP |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP) |
instacron_str |
ABP |
institution |
ABP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) - Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbp@abpbrasil.org.br |
_version_ |
1754212558122778624 |