Screening for common mental disorders using the SRQ-20 in Brazil: what are the alternative strategies for analysis?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barreto do Carmo,Maria B.
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Santos,Leticia M. dos, Feitosa,Caroline A., Fiaccone,Rosemeire L., Silva,Nívea B. da, Santos,Darci N. dos, Barreto,Maurício L., Amorim,Leila D.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462018000200115
Resumo: Objective: To analyze the prevalence of common mental disorders (CMD) assessed with the Self Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20), using the established cutoff point, and comparing it with the results of a joint correspondence factor analysis (CFA) and cluster analysis and of a latent class analysis (LCA). Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in an urban sample of 1,095 women aged 19 to 55 years. Joint CFA-cluster analysis and LCA were used. Results: We found a high prevalence of CMD, regardless of classification method (37.6% when using the cutoff point; 44.4% and 52% for LCA and joint CFA-cluster, respectively). The alternative analysis strategies describe the cases more efficiently when compared to the traditional cutoff method, especially regarding more severe symptoms. Both alternative strategies also provide a description of the SRQ-20 dimensions in their particularities, which may be useful for the planning and implementation of specific actions in a given population. Conclusion: The SRQ-20 cutoff point seems to underestimate the magnitude of CMD among women. The alternative methods of analysis presented herein highlight the different possibilities of using this important instrument of screening for mental health.
id ABP-1_77a9b80491d7073b548ead91e741caa6
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-44462018000200115
network_acronym_str ABP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Screening for common mental disorders using the SRQ-20 in Brazil: what are the alternative strategies for analysis?Screeningmental healthmultivariate analysislatent class analysiscorrespondence analysis Objective: To analyze the prevalence of common mental disorders (CMD) assessed with the Self Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20), using the established cutoff point, and comparing it with the results of a joint correspondence factor analysis (CFA) and cluster analysis and of a latent class analysis (LCA). Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in an urban sample of 1,095 women aged 19 to 55 years. Joint CFA-cluster analysis and LCA were used. Results: We found a high prevalence of CMD, regardless of classification method (37.6% when using the cutoff point; 44.4% and 52% for LCA and joint CFA-cluster, respectively). The alternative analysis strategies describe the cases more efficiently when compared to the traditional cutoff method, especially regarding more severe symptoms. Both alternative strategies also provide a description of the SRQ-20 dimensions in their particularities, which may be useful for the planning and implementation of specific actions in a given population. Conclusion: The SRQ-20 cutoff point seems to underestimate the magnitude of CMD among women. The alternative methods of analysis presented herein highlight the different possibilities of using this important instrument of screening for mental health.Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria2018-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462018000200115Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry v.40 n.2 2018reponame:Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)instacron:ABP10.1590/1516-4446-2016-2139info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarreto do Carmo,Maria B.Santos,Leticia M. dosFeitosa,Caroline A.Fiaccone,Rosemeire L.Silva,Nívea B. daSantos,Darci N. dosBarreto,Maurício L.Amorim,Leila D.eng2018-05-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-44462018000200115Revistahttp://www.bjp.org.br/ahead_of_print.asphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbp@abpbrasil.org.br1809-452X1516-4446opendoar:2018-05-28T00:00Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) - Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Screening for common mental disorders using the SRQ-20 in Brazil: what are the alternative strategies for analysis?
title Screening for common mental disorders using the SRQ-20 in Brazil: what are the alternative strategies for analysis?
spellingShingle Screening for common mental disorders using the SRQ-20 in Brazil: what are the alternative strategies for analysis?
Barreto do Carmo,Maria B.
Screening
mental health
multivariate analysis
latent class analysis
correspondence analysis
title_short Screening for common mental disorders using the SRQ-20 in Brazil: what are the alternative strategies for analysis?
title_full Screening for common mental disorders using the SRQ-20 in Brazil: what are the alternative strategies for analysis?
title_fullStr Screening for common mental disorders using the SRQ-20 in Brazil: what are the alternative strategies for analysis?
title_full_unstemmed Screening for common mental disorders using the SRQ-20 in Brazil: what are the alternative strategies for analysis?
title_sort Screening for common mental disorders using the SRQ-20 in Brazil: what are the alternative strategies for analysis?
author Barreto do Carmo,Maria B.
author_facet Barreto do Carmo,Maria B.
Santos,Leticia M. dos
Feitosa,Caroline A.
Fiaccone,Rosemeire L.
Silva,Nívea B. da
Santos,Darci N. dos
Barreto,Maurício L.
Amorim,Leila D.
author_role author
author2 Santos,Leticia M. dos
Feitosa,Caroline A.
Fiaccone,Rosemeire L.
Silva,Nívea B. da
Santos,Darci N. dos
Barreto,Maurício L.
Amorim,Leila D.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barreto do Carmo,Maria B.
Santos,Leticia M. dos
Feitosa,Caroline A.
Fiaccone,Rosemeire L.
Silva,Nívea B. da
Santos,Darci N. dos
Barreto,Maurício L.
Amorim,Leila D.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Screening
mental health
multivariate analysis
latent class analysis
correspondence analysis
topic Screening
mental health
multivariate analysis
latent class analysis
correspondence analysis
description Objective: To analyze the prevalence of common mental disorders (CMD) assessed with the Self Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20), using the established cutoff point, and comparing it with the results of a joint correspondence factor analysis (CFA) and cluster analysis and of a latent class analysis (LCA). Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in an urban sample of 1,095 women aged 19 to 55 years. Joint CFA-cluster analysis and LCA were used. Results: We found a high prevalence of CMD, regardless of classification method (37.6% when using the cutoff point; 44.4% and 52% for LCA and joint CFA-cluster, respectively). The alternative analysis strategies describe the cases more efficiently when compared to the traditional cutoff method, especially regarding more severe symptoms. Both alternative strategies also provide a description of the SRQ-20 dimensions in their particularities, which may be useful for the planning and implementation of specific actions in a given population. Conclusion: The SRQ-20 cutoff point seems to underestimate the magnitude of CMD among women. The alternative methods of analysis presented herein highlight the different possibilities of using this important instrument of screening for mental health.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462018000200115
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462018000200115
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1516-4446-2016-2139
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry v.40 n.2 2018
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)
instacron:ABP
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)
instacron_str ABP
institution ABP
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) - Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbp@abpbrasil.org.br
_version_ 1754212558122778624