Predictors of response in the treatment of moderate depression

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bastos,Andre G.
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Guimarães,Luciano S., Trentini,Clarissa M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462017000100012
Resumo: Objective: To identify neurocognitive and sociodemographic variables that could be associated with clinical response to three modalities of treatment for depression, as well as variables that predicted superior response to one treatment over the others. Method: The present study derives from a research project in which depressed patients (n=272) received one of three treatments – long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (n=90), fluoxetine therapy (n=91), or a combination thereof (n=91) – over a 24-month period. Results: Sociodemographic variables were not found to be predictive. Six predictive neurocognitive variables were identified: three prognostic variables related to working memory and abstract reasoning; one prescriptive variable related to working memory; and two variables found to be moderators. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate subgroups of patients who might benefit from specific therapeutic strategies and subgroups that seem to respond well to long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and combined therapy. The moderators found suggest that abstract reasoning and processing speed may influence the magnitude and/or direction of clinical improvement.
id ABP-1_9e7c471e9131b3b2dbde0e8deb2a6781
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-44462017000100012
network_acronym_str ABP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Predictors of response in the treatment of moderate depressionDepressionpsychotherapyfluoxetinemoderatorspredictorsneurocognition Objective: To identify neurocognitive and sociodemographic variables that could be associated with clinical response to three modalities of treatment for depression, as well as variables that predicted superior response to one treatment over the others. Method: The present study derives from a research project in which depressed patients (n=272) received one of three treatments – long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (n=90), fluoxetine therapy (n=91), or a combination thereof (n=91) – over a 24-month period. Results: Sociodemographic variables were not found to be predictive. Six predictive neurocognitive variables were identified: three prognostic variables related to working memory and abstract reasoning; one prescriptive variable related to working memory; and two variables found to be moderators. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate subgroups of patients who might benefit from specific therapeutic strategies and subgroups that seem to respond well to long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and combined therapy. The moderators found suggest that abstract reasoning and processing speed may influence the magnitude and/or direction of clinical improvement.Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria2017-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462017000100012Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry v.39 n.1 2017reponame:Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)instacron:ABP10.1590/1516-4446-2016-1976info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBastos,Andre G.Guimarães,Luciano S.Trentini,Clarissa M.eng2017-06-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-44462017000100012Revistahttp://www.bjp.org.br/ahead_of_print.asphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbp@abpbrasil.org.br1809-452X1516-4446opendoar:2017-06-01T00:00Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) - Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Predictors of response in the treatment of moderate depression
title Predictors of response in the treatment of moderate depression
spellingShingle Predictors of response in the treatment of moderate depression
Bastos,Andre G.
Depression
psychotherapy
fluoxetine
moderators
predictors
neurocognition
title_short Predictors of response in the treatment of moderate depression
title_full Predictors of response in the treatment of moderate depression
title_fullStr Predictors of response in the treatment of moderate depression
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of response in the treatment of moderate depression
title_sort Predictors of response in the treatment of moderate depression
author Bastos,Andre G.
author_facet Bastos,Andre G.
Guimarães,Luciano S.
Trentini,Clarissa M.
author_role author
author2 Guimarães,Luciano S.
Trentini,Clarissa M.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bastos,Andre G.
Guimarães,Luciano S.
Trentini,Clarissa M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Depression
psychotherapy
fluoxetine
moderators
predictors
neurocognition
topic Depression
psychotherapy
fluoxetine
moderators
predictors
neurocognition
description Objective: To identify neurocognitive and sociodemographic variables that could be associated with clinical response to three modalities of treatment for depression, as well as variables that predicted superior response to one treatment over the others. Method: The present study derives from a research project in which depressed patients (n=272) received one of three treatments – long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (n=90), fluoxetine therapy (n=91), or a combination thereof (n=91) – over a 24-month period. Results: Sociodemographic variables were not found to be predictive. Six predictive neurocognitive variables were identified: three prognostic variables related to working memory and abstract reasoning; one prescriptive variable related to working memory; and two variables found to be moderators. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate subgroups of patients who might benefit from specific therapeutic strategies and subgroups that seem to respond well to long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and combined therapy. The moderators found suggest that abstract reasoning and processing speed may influence the magnitude and/or direction of clinical improvement.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462017000100012
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462017000100012
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1516-4446-2016-1976
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry v.39 n.1 2017
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)
instacron:ABP
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)
instacron_str ABP
institution ABP
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) - Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbp@abpbrasil.org.br
_version_ 1754212557359415296