Pharmacological treatment and staging in bipolar disorder: evidence from clinical practice
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462015000200121 |
Resumo: | Objectives:Staging models for medical diseases are widely used to guide treatment and prognosis. Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic condition and it is among the most disabling disorders in medicine. The staging model proposed by Kapczinski in 2009 presents four progressive clinical stages of BD. Our aim was to evaluate pharmacological maintenance treatment across these stages in patients with BD.Methods:One hundred and twenty-nine subjects who met DSM-IV criteria for BD were recruited from the Bipolar Disorders Program at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil. All patients were in remission. The subjects were classified according to the staging model: 31 subjects were classified as stage I, 44 as stage II, 31 as stage III, and 23 as stage IV.Results:Patterns of pharmacological treatment differed among the four stages (p = 0.001). Monotherapy was more frequent in stage I, and two-drug combinations in stage II. Patients at stages III and IV needed three or more medications or clozapine. Impairment in functional status (Functioning Assessment Short Test [FAST] scale scores) correlated positively with the number of medications prescribed.Conclusions:This study demonstrated differences in pharmacological treatment in patients with stable BD depending on disease stage. Treatment response can change with progression of BD. Clinical guidelines could consider the staging model to guide treatment effectiveness. |
id |
ABP-1_c80d39cbb052790fac113a4bf0f2f5b5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-44462015000200121 |
network_acronym_str |
ABP-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Pharmacological treatment and staging in bipolar disorder: evidence from clinical practiceBipolar mood disordersanticonvulsantsantidepressantsantipsychoticsdiagnosis and classificationObjectives:Staging models for medical diseases are widely used to guide treatment and prognosis. Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic condition and it is among the most disabling disorders in medicine. The staging model proposed by Kapczinski in 2009 presents four progressive clinical stages of BD. Our aim was to evaluate pharmacological maintenance treatment across these stages in patients with BD.Methods:One hundred and twenty-nine subjects who met DSM-IV criteria for BD were recruited from the Bipolar Disorders Program at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil. All patients were in remission. The subjects were classified according to the staging model: 31 subjects were classified as stage I, 44 as stage II, 31 as stage III, and 23 as stage IV.Results:Patterns of pharmacological treatment differed among the four stages (p = 0.001). Monotherapy was more frequent in stage I, and two-drug combinations in stage II. Patients at stages III and IV needed three or more medications or clozapine. Impairment in functional status (Functioning Assessment Short Test [FAST] scale scores) correlated positively with the number of medications prescribed.Conclusions:This study demonstrated differences in pharmacological treatment in patients with stable BD depending on disease stage. Treatment response can change with progression of BD. Clinical guidelines could consider the staging model to guide treatment effectiveness.Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria2015-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462015000200121Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry v.37 n.2 2015reponame:Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)instacron:ABP10.1590/1516-4446-2014-1554info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGoi,Pedro D.Bücker,JoanaVianna-Sulzbach,MireiaRosa,Adriane R.Grande,IriaChendo,InesSodré,Leonardo A.Kauer-Sant'Anna,MarciaSilveira,LeonardoKunz,MauricioCeresér,Keila M.Gama,Clarissa S.Massuda,Raffaeleng2015-09-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-44462015000200121Revistahttp://www.bjp.org.br/ahead_of_print.asphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbp@abpbrasil.org.br1809-452X1516-4446opendoar:2015-09-10T00:00Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) - Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pharmacological treatment and staging in bipolar disorder: evidence from clinical practice |
title |
Pharmacological treatment and staging in bipolar disorder: evidence from clinical practice |
spellingShingle |
Pharmacological treatment and staging in bipolar disorder: evidence from clinical practice Goi,Pedro D. Bipolar mood disorders anticonvulsants antidepressants antipsychotics diagnosis and classification |
title_short |
Pharmacological treatment and staging in bipolar disorder: evidence from clinical practice |
title_full |
Pharmacological treatment and staging in bipolar disorder: evidence from clinical practice |
title_fullStr |
Pharmacological treatment and staging in bipolar disorder: evidence from clinical practice |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pharmacological treatment and staging in bipolar disorder: evidence from clinical practice |
title_sort |
Pharmacological treatment and staging in bipolar disorder: evidence from clinical practice |
author |
Goi,Pedro D. |
author_facet |
Goi,Pedro D. Bücker,Joana Vianna-Sulzbach,Mireia Rosa,Adriane R. Grande,Iria Chendo,Ines Sodré,Leonardo A. Kauer-Sant'Anna,Marcia Silveira,Leonardo Kunz,Mauricio Ceresér,Keila M. Gama,Clarissa S. Massuda,Raffael |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bücker,Joana Vianna-Sulzbach,Mireia Rosa,Adriane R. Grande,Iria Chendo,Ines Sodré,Leonardo A. Kauer-Sant'Anna,Marcia Silveira,Leonardo Kunz,Mauricio Ceresér,Keila M. Gama,Clarissa S. Massuda,Raffael |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Goi,Pedro D. Bücker,Joana Vianna-Sulzbach,Mireia Rosa,Adriane R. Grande,Iria Chendo,Ines Sodré,Leonardo A. Kauer-Sant'Anna,Marcia Silveira,Leonardo Kunz,Mauricio Ceresér,Keila M. Gama,Clarissa S. Massuda,Raffael |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bipolar mood disorders anticonvulsants antidepressants antipsychotics diagnosis and classification |
topic |
Bipolar mood disorders anticonvulsants antidepressants antipsychotics diagnosis and classification |
description |
Objectives:Staging models for medical diseases are widely used to guide treatment and prognosis. Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic condition and it is among the most disabling disorders in medicine. The staging model proposed by Kapczinski in 2009 presents four progressive clinical stages of BD. Our aim was to evaluate pharmacological maintenance treatment across these stages in patients with BD.Methods:One hundred and twenty-nine subjects who met DSM-IV criteria for BD were recruited from the Bipolar Disorders Program at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil. All patients were in remission. The subjects were classified according to the staging model: 31 subjects were classified as stage I, 44 as stage II, 31 as stage III, and 23 as stage IV.Results:Patterns of pharmacological treatment differed among the four stages (p = 0.001). Monotherapy was more frequent in stage I, and two-drug combinations in stage II. Patients at stages III and IV needed three or more medications or clozapine. Impairment in functional status (Functioning Assessment Short Test [FAST] scale scores) correlated positively with the number of medications prescribed.Conclusions:This study demonstrated differences in pharmacological treatment in patients with stable BD depending on disease stage. Treatment response can change with progression of BD. Clinical guidelines could consider the staging model to guide treatment effectiveness. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462015000200121 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462015000200121 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1516-4446-2014-1554 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry v.37 n.2 2015 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP) instacron:ABP |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP) |
instacron_str |
ABP |
institution |
ABP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) - Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbp@abpbrasil.org.br |
_version_ |
1754212556898041856 |