Pharmacological treatment and staging in bipolar disorder: evidence from clinical practice

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Goi,Pedro D.
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Bücker,Joana, Vianna-Sulzbach,Mireia, Rosa,Adriane R., Grande,Iria, Chendo,Ines, Sodré,Leonardo A., Kauer-Sant'Anna,Marcia, Silveira,Leonardo, Kunz,Mauricio, Ceresér,Keila M., Gama,Clarissa S., Massuda,Raffael
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462015000200121
Resumo: Objectives:Staging models for medical diseases are widely used to guide treatment and prognosis. Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic condition and it is among the most disabling disorders in medicine. The staging model proposed by Kapczinski in 2009 presents four progressive clinical stages of BD. Our aim was to evaluate pharmacological maintenance treatment across these stages in patients with BD.Methods:One hundred and twenty-nine subjects who met DSM-IV criteria for BD were recruited from the Bipolar Disorders Program at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil. All patients were in remission. The subjects were classified according to the staging model: 31 subjects were classified as stage I, 44 as stage II, 31 as stage III, and 23 as stage IV.Results:Patterns of pharmacological treatment differed among the four stages (p = 0.001). Monotherapy was more frequent in stage I, and two-drug combinations in stage II. Patients at stages III and IV needed three or more medications or clozapine. Impairment in functional status (Functioning Assessment Short Test [FAST] scale scores) correlated positively with the number of medications prescribed.Conclusions:This study demonstrated differences in pharmacological treatment in patients with stable BD depending on disease stage. Treatment response can change with progression of BD. Clinical guidelines could consider the staging model to guide treatment effectiveness.
id ABP-1_c80d39cbb052790fac113a4bf0f2f5b5
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-44462015000200121
network_acronym_str ABP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Pharmacological treatment and staging in bipolar disorder: evidence from clinical practiceBipolar mood disordersanticonvulsantsantidepressantsantipsychoticsdiagnosis and classificationObjectives:Staging models for medical diseases are widely used to guide treatment and prognosis. Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic condition and it is among the most disabling disorders in medicine. The staging model proposed by Kapczinski in 2009 presents four progressive clinical stages of BD. Our aim was to evaluate pharmacological maintenance treatment across these stages in patients with BD.Methods:One hundred and twenty-nine subjects who met DSM-IV criteria for BD were recruited from the Bipolar Disorders Program at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil. All patients were in remission. The subjects were classified according to the staging model: 31 subjects were classified as stage I, 44 as stage II, 31 as stage III, and 23 as stage IV.Results:Patterns of pharmacological treatment differed among the four stages (p = 0.001). Monotherapy was more frequent in stage I, and two-drug combinations in stage II. Patients at stages III and IV needed three or more medications or clozapine. Impairment in functional status (Functioning Assessment Short Test [FAST] scale scores) correlated positively with the number of medications prescribed.Conclusions:This study demonstrated differences in pharmacological treatment in patients with stable BD depending on disease stage. Treatment response can change with progression of BD. Clinical guidelines could consider the staging model to guide treatment effectiveness.Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria2015-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462015000200121Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry v.37 n.2 2015reponame:Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)instacron:ABP10.1590/1516-4446-2014-1554info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGoi,Pedro D.Bücker,JoanaVianna-Sulzbach,MireiaRosa,Adriane R.Grande,IriaChendo,InesSodré,Leonardo A.Kauer-Sant'Anna,MarciaSilveira,LeonardoKunz,MauricioCeresér,Keila M.Gama,Clarissa S.Massuda,Raffaeleng2015-09-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-44462015000200121Revistahttp://www.bjp.org.br/ahead_of_print.asphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbp@abpbrasil.org.br1809-452X1516-4446opendoar:2015-09-10T00:00Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) - Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pharmacological treatment and staging in bipolar disorder: evidence from clinical practice
title Pharmacological treatment and staging in bipolar disorder: evidence from clinical practice
spellingShingle Pharmacological treatment and staging in bipolar disorder: evidence from clinical practice
Goi,Pedro D.
Bipolar mood disorders
anticonvulsants
antidepressants
antipsychotics
diagnosis and classification
title_short Pharmacological treatment and staging in bipolar disorder: evidence from clinical practice
title_full Pharmacological treatment and staging in bipolar disorder: evidence from clinical practice
title_fullStr Pharmacological treatment and staging in bipolar disorder: evidence from clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacological treatment and staging in bipolar disorder: evidence from clinical practice
title_sort Pharmacological treatment and staging in bipolar disorder: evidence from clinical practice
author Goi,Pedro D.
author_facet Goi,Pedro D.
Bücker,Joana
Vianna-Sulzbach,Mireia
Rosa,Adriane R.
Grande,Iria
Chendo,Ines
Sodré,Leonardo A.
Kauer-Sant'Anna,Marcia
Silveira,Leonardo
Kunz,Mauricio
Ceresér,Keila M.
Gama,Clarissa S.
Massuda,Raffael
author_role author
author2 Bücker,Joana
Vianna-Sulzbach,Mireia
Rosa,Adriane R.
Grande,Iria
Chendo,Ines
Sodré,Leonardo A.
Kauer-Sant'Anna,Marcia
Silveira,Leonardo
Kunz,Mauricio
Ceresér,Keila M.
Gama,Clarissa S.
Massuda,Raffael
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Goi,Pedro D.
Bücker,Joana
Vianna-Sulzbach,Mireia
Rosa,Adriane R.
Grande,Iria
Chendo,Ines
Sodré,Leonardo A.
Kauer-Sant'Anna,Marcia
Silveira,Leonardo
Kunz,Mauricio
Ceresér,Keila M.
Gama,Clarissa S.
Massuda,Raffael
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bipolar mood disorders
anticonvulsants
antidepressants
antipsychotics
diagnosis and classification
topic Bipolar mood disorders
anticonvulsants
antidepressants
antipsychotics
diagnosis and classification
description Objectives:Staging models for medical diseases are widely used to guide treatment and prognosis. Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic condition and it is among the most disabling disorders in medicine. The staging model proposed by Kapczinski in 2009 presents four progressive clinical stages of BD. Our aim was to evaluate pharmacological maintenance treatment across these stages in patients with BD.Methods:One hundred and twenty-nine subjects who met DSM-IV criteria for BD were recruited from the Bipolar Disorders Program at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil. All patients were in remission. The subjects were classified according to the staging model: 31 subjects were classified as stage I, 44 as stage II, 31 as stage III, and 23 as stage IV.Results:Patterns of pharmacological treatment differed among the four stages (p = 0.001). Monotherapy was more frequent in stage I, and two-drug combinations in stage II. Patients at stages III and IV needed three or more medications or clozapine. Impairment in functional status (Functioning Assessment Short Test [FAST] scale scores) correlated positively with the number of medications prescribed.Conclusions:This study demonstrated differences in pharmacological treatment in patients with stable BD depending on disease stage. Treatment response can change with progression of BD. Clinical guidelines could consider the staging model to guide treatment effectiveness.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462015000200121
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462015000200121
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1516-4446-2014-1554
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry v.37 n.2 2015
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)
instacron:ABP
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)
instacron_str ABP
institution ABP
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) - Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbp@abpbrasil.org.br
_version_ 1754212556898041856