Interpretações de uma crise: os debates sobre moeda e comércio na Inglaterra durante o parlamento de 1621

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Suprinyak, Carlos Eduardo
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista História Econômica & História de Empresas (Online)
Texto Completo: https://hehe.org.br/index.php/rabphe/article/view/256
Resumo: The parliament of 1621 witnessed extensive debating of economic issues by those engaged in finding solutions for the exacting crisis which affected England at the time. These proceedings offer the background against which some of the most relevant economic literature of the period was produced. As debates progressed, two contrasting perspectives gradually emerged. One of them argued that monetary imbalances were responsible for bullion outflows and sluggish economic activity, while the other believed that monetary flows were ultimately caused by an unfavorable balance of trade. These were exactly the same issues at stake in the controversy between Gerard de Malynes and Edward Misselden in the early 1620’s, to which Thomas Mun would provide a solution with his strict adherence to the balance of trade. Thus, through an analysis of economic debates in the parliament of 1621, this paper seeks to offer an essential element for understanding early-17th century English economic thought.
id ABPHE_99e0821302813b5806bd7f950b36a245
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.hehe.org.br:article/256
network_acronym_str ABPHE
network_name_str Revista História Econômica & História de Empresas (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Interpretações de uma crise: os debates sobre moeda e comércio na Inglaterra durante o parlamento de 1621pensamento econômico pré-clássicoparlamento de 1621Inglaterra StuartThomas MunLionel CranfieldThe parliament of 1621 witnessed extensive debating of economic issues by those engaged in finding solutions for the exacting crisis which affected England at the time. These proceedings offer the background against which some of the most relevant economic literature of the period was produced. As debates progressed, two contrasting perspectives gradually emerged. One of them argued that monetary imbalances were responsible for bullion outflows and sluggish economic activity, while the other believed that monetary flows were ultimately caused by an unfavorable balance of trade. These were exactly the same issues at stake in the controversy between Gerard de Malynes and Edward Misselden in the early 1620’s, to which Thomas Mun would provide a solution with his strict adherence to the balance of trade. Thus, through an analysis of economic debates in the parliament of 1621, this paper seeks to offer an essential element for understanding early-17th century English economic thought.ABPHE2014-06-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://hehe.org.br/index.php/rabphe/article/view/25610.29182/hehe.v17i1.256Economic History & Business History; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2014)História Econômica & História de Empresas; v. 17 n. 1 (2014)2525-81841519-331410.29182/hehe.v17i1reponame:Revista História Econômica & História de Empresas (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em História Econômica (ABPHE)instacron:ABPHEenghttps://hehe.org.br/index.php/rabphe/article/view/256/287Copyright (c) 2014 História Econômica & História de Empresasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSuprinyak, Carlos Eduardo2021-03-13T04:22:07Zoai:ojs.hehe.org.br:article/256Revistahttps://hehe.org.br/index.php/rabpheONGhttps://hehe.org.br/index.php/rabphe/oaihehe.abphe@gmail.com2525-81841519-3314opendoar:2021-03-13T04:22:07Revista História Econômica & História de Empresas (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em História Econômica (ABPHE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Interpretações de uma crise: os debates sobre moeda e comércio na Inglaterra durante o parlamento de 1621
title Interpretações de uma crise: os debates sobre moeda e comércio na Inglaterra durante o parlamento de 1621
spellingShingle Interpretações de uma crise: os debates sobre moeda e comércio na Inglaterra durante o parlamento de 1621
Suprinyak, Carlos Eduardo
pensamento econômico pré-clássico
parlamento de 1621
Inglaterra Stuart
Thomas Mun
Lionel Cranfield
title_short Interpretações de uma crise: os debates sobre moeda e comércio na Inglaterra durante o parlamento de 1621
title_full Interpretações de uma crise: os debates sobre moeda e comércio na Inglaterra durante o parlamento de 1621
title_fullStr Interpretações de uma crise: os debates sobre moeda e comércio na Inglaterra durante o parlamento de 1621
title_full_unstemmed Interpretações de uma crise: os debates sobre moeda e comércio na Inglaterra durante o parlamento de 1621
title_sort Interpretações de uma crise: os debates sobre moeda e comércio na Inglaterra durante o parlamento de 1621
author Suprinyak, Carlos Eduardo
author_facet Suprinyak, Carlos Eduardo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Suprinyak, Carlos Eduardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv pensamento econômico pré-clássico
parlamento de 1621
Inglaterra Stuart
Thomas Mun
Lionel Cranfield
topic pensamento econômico pré-clássico
parlamento de 1621
Inglaterra Stuart
Thomas Mun
Lionel Cranfield
description The parliament of 1621 witnessed extensive debating of economic issues by those engaged in finding solutions for the exacting crisis which affected England at the time. These proceedings offer the background against which some of the most relevant economic literature of the period was produced. As debates progressed, two contrasting perspectives gradually emerged. One of them argued that monetary imbalances were responsible for bullion outflows and sluggish economic activity, while the other believed that monetary flows were ultimately caused by an unfavorable balance of trade. These were exactly the same issues at stake in the controversy between Gerard de Malynes and Edward Misselden in the early 1620’s, to which Thomas Mun would provide a solution with his strict adherence to the balance of trade. Thus, through an analysis of economic debates in the parliament of 1621, this paper seeks to offer an essential element for understanding early-17th century English economic thought.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-06-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hehe.org.br/index.php/rabphe/article/view/256
10.29182/hehe.v17i1.256
url https://hehe.org.br/index.php/rabphe/article/view/256
identifier_str_mv 10.29182/hehe.v17i1.256
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://hehe.org.br/index.php/rabphe/article/view/256/287
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 História Econômica & História de Empresas
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 História Econômica & História de Empresas
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABPHE
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABPHE
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Economic History & Business History; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2014)
História Econômica & História de Empresas; v. 17 n. 1 (2014)
2525-8184
1519-3314
10.29182/hehe.v17i1
reponame:Revista História Econômica & História de Empresas (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em História Econômica (ABPHE)
instacron:ABPHE
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em História Econômica (ABPHE)
instacron_str ABPHE
institution ABPHE
reponame_str Revista História Econômica & História de Empresas (Online)
collection Revista História Econômica & História de Empresas (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista História Econômica & História de Empresas (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em História Econômica (ABPHE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv hehe.abphe@gmail.com
_version_ 1797067524481744896