Effects of sensor, trials and knee joint variables on electrogoniometric gait recordings
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552008000600006 |
Resumo: | INTRODUCTION: Different sources of variations, such as electrogoniometer characteristics and procedures, may affect the accuracy and precision of movement measurements during gait. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the variations and compare the effects produced by different sources of variation in electrogoniometric gait recordings: the sensors, procedures (trials) and the knee joint. METHODS: Knee flexion/extension and valgus/varus movements were recorded during gait on the treadmill. The recordings were partitioned into strides and normalized in time using a routine developed in MatLab. Mean curves for the knee during gait were derived from 50 strides, and seven conditions were evaluated: one comparing pairs of sensors; two comparing pairs of different trials (including variations due to sensors); and four comparing the right and left knees (including variations due to sensors and trials). Mean standard deviations of the differences were calculated. To estimate the variations relating to the trial and the knee joint, the compound standard deviations were transformed into variances and split into their components. RESULTS: The variation introduced by pairs of sensors in the same model applied in one trial was smaller than the variation introduced by the same sensor used in two consecutive trials. Furthermore, the variation introduced by the difference between the right and left knees was greater than the variation introduced by the difference between sensors (A and B) and trials (1 and 2). CONCLUSIONS: It is, therefore, preferable to use different sensors in the same data recording (simultaneous) than use the same sensor in two different recordings (consecutive). |
id |
ABRA-FT-1_188fe8e8600e5a0e8cf4c8d1f6793dba |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1413-35552008000600006 |
network_acronym_str |
ABRA-FT-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Effects of sensor, trials and knee joint variables on electrogoniometric gait recordingsmovementmeasurement errorgaitINTRODUCTION: Different sources of variations, such as electrogoniometer characteristics and procedures, may affect the accuracy and precision of movement measurements during gait. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the variations and compare the effects produced by different sources of variation in electrogoniometric gait recordings: the sensors, procedures (trials) and the knee joint. METHODS: Knee flexion/extension and valgus/varus movements were recorded during gait on the treadmill. The recordings were partitioned into strides and normalized in time using a routine developed in MatLab. Mean curves for the knee during gait were derived from 50 strides, and seven conditions were evaluated: one comparing pairs of sensors; two comparing pairs of different trials (including variations due to sensors); and four comparing the right and left knees (including variations due to sensors and trials). Mean standard deviations of the differences were calculated. To estimate the variations relating to the trial and the knee joint, the compound standard deviations were transformed into variances and split into their components. RESULTS: The variation introduced by pairs of sensors in the same model applied in one trial was smaller than the variation introduced by the same sensor used in two consecutive trials. Furthermore, the variation introduced by the difference between the right and left knees was greater than the variation introduced by the difference between sensors (A and B) and trials (1 and 2). CONCLUSIONS: It is, therefore, preferable to use different sensors in the same data recording (simultaneous) than use the same sensor in two different recordings (consecutive).Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia 2008-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552008000600006Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy v.12 n.6 2008reponame:Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapyinstname:Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)instacron:ABRAPG-FT10.1590/S1413-35552008005000008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarnaz,LOliveira,ABSato,TOHansson,G-ACoury,HJCGeng2009-02-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-35552008000600006Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rbfis/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcontato@rbf-bjpt.org.br||contato@rbf-bjpt.org.br1809-92461413-3555opendoar:2009-02-02T00:00Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy - Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effects of sensor, trials and knee joint variables on electrogoniometric gait recordings |
title |
Effects of sensor, trials and knee joint variables on electrogoniometric gait recordings |
spellingShingle |
Effects of sensor, trials and knee joint variables on electrogoniometric gait recordings Carnaz,L movement measurement error gait |
title_short |
Effects of sensor, trials and knee joint variables on electrogoniometric gait recordings |
title_full |
Effects of sensor, trials and knee joint variables on electrogoniometric gait recordings |
title_fullStr |
Effects of sensor, trials and knee joint variables on electrogoniometric gait recordings |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of sensor, trials and knee joint variables on electrogoniometric gait recordings |
title_sort |
Effects of sensor, trials and knee joint variables on electrogoniometric gait recordings |
author |
Carnaz,L |
author_facet |
Carnaz,L Oliveira,AB Sato,TO Hansson,G-A Coury,HJCG |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira,AB Sato,TO Hansson,G-A Coury,HJCG |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carnaz,L Oliveira,AB Sato,TO Hansson,G-A Coury,HJCG |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
movement measurement error gait |
topic |
movement measurement error gait |
description |
INTRODUCTION: Different sources of variations, such as electrogoniometer characteristics and procedures, may affect the accuracy and precision of movement measurements during gait. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the variations and compare the effects produced by different sources of variation in electrogoniometric gait recordings: the sensors, procedures (trials) and the knee joint. METHODS: Knee flexion/extension and valgus/varus movements were recorded during gait on the treadmill. The recordings were partitioned into strides and normalized in time using a routine developed in MatLab. Mean curves for the knee during gait were derived from 50 strides, and seven conditions were evaluated: one comparing pairs of sensors; two comparing pairs of different trials (including variations due to sensors); and four comparing the right and left knees (including variations due to sensors and trials). Mean standard deviations of the differences were calculated. To estimate the variations relating to the trial and the knee joint, the compound standard deviations were transformed into variances and split into their components. RESULTS: The variation introduced by pairs of sensors in the same model applied in one trial was smaller than the variation introduced by the same sensor used in two consecutive trials. Furthermore, the variation introduced by the difference between the right and left knees was greater than the variation introduced by the difference between sensors (A and B) and trials (1 and 2). CONCLUSIONS: It is, therefore, preferable to use different sensors in the same data recording (simultaneous) than use the same sensor in two different recordings (consecutive). |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552008000600006 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552008000600006 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1413-35552008005000008 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy v.12 n.6 2008 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy instname:Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT) instacron:ABRAPG-FT |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT) |
instacron_str |
ABRAPG-FT |
institution |
ABRAPG-FT |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy - Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
contato@rbf-bjpt.org.br||contato@rbf-bjpt.org.br |
_version_ |
1754575947400478720 |