Relationship between force platform and two functional tests for measuring balance in the elderly

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gil,André W. O.
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Oliveira,Marcio R., Coelho,Vinícius A., Carvalho,Carlos E., Teixeira,Denilson C., Silva Jr,Rubens A. da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552011000600002
Resumo: BACKGROUND: Clinical and laboratory methods have been developed to assess the different dimensions of postural control with the aim to increase the clinical relevance of decisions about balance deficit. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to correlate the force platform measurements with two functional tests used to evaluate balance in elderly. METHODS: A total of 124 physically independent elderly volunteers participated in this study. Subjects performed the following three tests: 1) a traditional functional balance test, named the one-leg standing test, which measures the time in seconds at this position; 2) a functionalagility/dynamic balance test, which quantifies the total time in seconds that a subject canstand up from a chair and move as quickly as possible around two cones; and 3) an unipodal balance test on a force platform. RESULTS: The one-leg standing test yielded a mean of 12 seconds (SD=9 s), while the mean time observed in the functional agility/dynamic balance test was 26 seconds (SD=6 s). The correlations between the balance parameters of force platform and two functional tests varied between -0.28 and 0.20, which shows a weak association between them. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the idea that these functional tests do not necessarily furnish the same information regarding balance mechanisms as the force platform. This study contributes to the evaluation of balance in elderly and suggests that functional tests should be used with caution especially in regards to the purposes of the research and when conducting clinical assessments of the elderly.
id ABRA-FT-1_23cf1f4a74817cde549bd05551225cfb
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-35552011000600002
network_acronym_str ABRA-FT-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
repository_id_str
spelling Relationship between force platform and two functional tests for measuring balance in the elderlypostureagingmovementbiomechanicsrehabilitationBACKGROUND: Clinical and laboratory methods have been developed to assess the different dimensions of postural control with the aim to increase the clinical relevance of decisions about balance deficit. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to correlate the force platform measurements with two functional tests used to evaluate balance in elderly. METHODS: A total of 124 physically independent elderly volunteers participated in this study. Subjects performed the following three tests: 1) a traditional functional balance test, named the one-leg standing test, which measures the time in seconds at this position; 2) a functionalagility/dynamic balance test, which quantifies the total time in seconds that a subject canstand up from a chair and move as quickly as possible around two cones; and 3) an unipodal balance test on a force platform. RESULTS: The one-leg standing test yielded a mean of 12 seconds (SD=9 s), while the mean time observed in the functional agility/dynamic balance test was 26 seconds (SD=6 s). The correlations between the balance parameters of force platform and two functional tests varied between -0.28 and 0.20, which shows a weak association between them. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the idea that these functional tests do not necessarily furnish the same information regarding balance mechanisms as the force platform. This study contributes to the evaluation of balance in elderly and suggests that functional tests should be used with caution especially in regards to the purposes of the research and when conducting clinical assessments of the elderly.Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia 2011-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552011000600002Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy v.15 n.6 2011reponame:Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapyinstname:Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)instacron:ABRAPG-FT10.1590/S1413-35552011005000024info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGil,André W. O.Oliveira,Marcio R.Coelho,Vinícius A.Carvalho,Carlos E.Teixeira,Denilson C.Silva Jr,Rubens A. daeng2012-01-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-35552011000600002Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rbfis/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcontato@rbf-bjpt.org.br||contato@rbf-bjpt.org.br1809-92461413-3555opendoar:2012-01-02T00:00Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy - Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Relationship between force platform and two functional tests for measuring balance in the elderly
title Relationship between force platform and two functional tests for measuring balance in the elderly
spellingShingle Relationship between force platform and two functional tests for measuring balance in the elderly
Gil,André W. O.
posture
aging
movement
biomechanics
rehabilitation
title_short Relationship between force platform and two functional tests for measuring balance in the elderly
title_full Relationship between force platform and two functional tests for measuring balance in the elderly
title_fullStr Relationship between force platform and two functional tests for measuring balance in the elderly
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between force platform and two functional tests for measuring balance in the elderly
title_sort Relationship between force platform and two functional tests for measuring balance in the elderly
author Gil,André W. O.
author_facet Gil,André W. O.
Oliveira,Marcio R.
Coelho,Vinícius A.
Carvalho,Carlos E.
Teixeira,Denilson C.
Silva Jr,Rubens A. da
author_role author
author2 Oliveira,Marcio R.
Coelho,Vinícius A.
Carvalho,Carlos E.
Teixeira,Denilson C.
Silva Jr,Rubens A. da
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gil,André W. O.
Oliveira,Marcio R.
Coelho,Vinícius A.
Carvalho,Carlos E.
Teixeira,Denilson C.
Silva Jr,Rubens A. da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv posture
aging
movement
biomechanics
rehabilitation
topic posture
aging
movement
biomechanics
rehabilitation
description BACKGROUND: Clinical and laboratory methods have been developed to assess the different dimensions of postural control with the aim to increase the clinical relevance of decisions about balance deficit. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to correlate the force platform measurements with two functional tests used to evaluate balance in elderly. METHODS: A total of 124 physically independent elderly volunteers participated in this study. Subjects performed the following three tests: 1) a traditional functional balance test, named the one-leg standing test, which measures the time in seconds at this position; 2) a functionalagility/dynamic balance test, which quantifies the total time in seconds that a subject canstand up from a chair and move as quickly as possible around two cones; and 3) an unipodal balance test on a force platform. RESULTS: The one-leg standing test yielded a mean of 12 seconds (SD=9 s), while the mean time observed in the functional agility/dynamic balance test was 26 seconds (SD=6 s). The correlations between the balance parameters of force platform and two functional tests varied between -0.28 and 0.20, which shows a weak association between them. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the idea that these functional tests do not necessarily furnish the same information regarding balance mechanisms as the force platform. This study contributes to the evaluation of balance in elderly and suggests that functional tests should be used with caution especially in regards to the purposes of the research and when conducting clinical assessments of the elderly.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552011000600002
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552011000600002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1413-35552011005000024
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy v.15 n.6 2011
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
instname:Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)
instacron:ABRAPG-FT
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)
instacron_str ABRAPG-FT
institution ABRAPG-FT
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
collection Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy - Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv contato@rbf-bjpt.org.br||contato@rbf-bjpt.org.br
_version_ 1754575948740558848