The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mokkink,Lidwine B.
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Prinsen,Cecilia A. C., Bouter,Lex M., Vet,Henrica C. W. de, Terwee,Caroline B.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552016000200105
Resumo: Background: COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) is an initiative of an international multidisciplinary team of researchers who aim to improve the selection of outcome measurement instruments both in research and in clinical practice by developing tools for selecting the most appropriate available instrument. Method: In this paper these tools are described, i.e. the COSMIN taxonomy and definition of measurement properties; the COSMIN checklist to evaluate the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties; a search filter for finding studies on measurement properties; a protocol for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments; a database of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments; and a guideline for selecting outcome measurement instruments for Core Outcome Sets in clinical trials. Currently, we are updating the COSMIN checklist, particularly the standards for content validity studies. Also new standards for studies using Item Response Theory methods will be developed. Additionally, in the future we want to develop standards for studies on the quality of non-patient reported outcome measures, such as clinician-reported outcomes and performance-based outcomes. Conclusions: In summary, we plea for more standardization in the use of outcome measurement instruments, for conducting high quality systematic reviews on measurement instruments in which the best available outcome measurement instrument is recommended, and for stopping the use of poor outcome measurement instruments.
id ABRA-FT-1_41ccfde369642a33dcd40e65fab347b1
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-35552016000200105
network_acronym_str ABRA-FT-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
repository_id_str
spelling The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrumentCOSMINmeasurement propertiesoutcome measuressystematic reviews of instrumentsoutcome selection Background: COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) is an initiative of an international multidisciplinary team of researchers who aim to improve the selection of outcome measurement instruments both in research and in clinical practice by developing tools for selecting the most appropriate available instrument. Method: In this paper these tools are described, i.e. the COSMIN taxonomy and definition of measurement properties; the COSMIN checklist to evaluate the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties; a search filter for finding studies on measurement properties; a protocol for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments; a database of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments; and a guideline for selecting outcome measurement instruments for Core Outcome Sets in clinical trials. Currently, we are updating the COSMIN checklist, particularly the standards for content validity studies. Also new standards for studies using Item Response Theory methods will be developed. Additionally, in the future we want to develop standards for studies on the quality of non-patient reported outcome measures, such as clinician-reported outcomes and performance-based outcomes. Conclusions: In summary, we plea for more standardization in the use of outcome measurement instruments, for conducting high quality systematic reviews on measurement instruments in which the best available outcome measurement instrument is recommended, and for stopping the use of poor outcome measurement instruments.Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia 2016-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552016000200105Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy v.20 n.2 2016reponame:Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapyinstname:Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)instacron:ABRAPG-FT10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMokkink,Lidwine B.Prinsen,Cecilia A. C.Bouter,Lex M.Vet,Henrica C. W. deTerwee,Caroline B.eng2016-07-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-35552016000200105Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rbfis/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcontato@rbf-bjpt.org.br||contato@rbf-bjpt.org.br1809-92461413-3555opendoar:2016-07-15T00:00Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy - Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument
title The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument
spellingShingle The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument
Mokkink,Lidwine B.
COSMIN
measurement properties
outcome measures
systematic reviews of instruments
outcome selection
title_short The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument
title_full The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument
title_fullStr The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument
title_full_unstemmed The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument
title_sort The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument
author Mokkink,Lidwine B.
author_facet Mokkink,Lidwine B.
Prinsen,Cecilia A. C.
Bouter,Lex M.
Vet,Henrica C. W. de
Terwee,Caroline B.
author_role author
author2 Prinsen,Cecilia A. C.
Bouter,Lex M.
Vet,Henrica C. W. de
Terwee,Caroline B.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mokkink,Lidwine B.
Prinsen,Cecilia A. C.
Bouter,Lex M.
Vet,Henrica C. W. de
Terwee,Caroline B.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv COSMIN
measurement properties
outcome measures
systematic reviews of instruments
outcome selection
topic COSMIN
measurement properties
outcome measures
systematic reviews of instruments
outcome selection
description Background: COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) is an initiative of an international multidisciplinary team of researchers who aim to improve the selection of outcome measurement instruments both in research and in clinical practice by developing tools for selecting the most appropriate available instrument. Method: In this paper these tools are described, i.e. the COSMIN taxonomy and definition of measurement properties; the COSMIN checklist to evaluate the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties; a search filter for finding studies on measurement properties; a protocol for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments; a database of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments; and a guideline for selecting outcome measurement instruments for Core Outcome Sets in clinical trials. Currently, we are updating the COSMIN checklist, particularly the standards for content validity studies. Also new standards for studies using Item Response Theory methods will be developed. Additionally, in the future we want to develop standards for studies on the quality of non-patient reported outcome measures, such as clinician-reported outcomes and performance-based outcomes. Conclusions: In summary, we plea for more standardization in the use of outcome measurement instruments, for conducting high quality systematic reviews on measurement instruments in which the best available outcome measurement instrument is recommended, and for stopping the use of poor outcome measurement instruments.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552016000200105
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552016000200105
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy v.20 n.2 2016
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
instname:Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)
instacron:ABRAPG-FT
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)
instacron_str ABRAPG-FT
institution ABRAPG-FT
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
collection Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy - Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv contato@rbf-bjpt.org.br||contato@rbf-bjpt.org.br
_version_ 1754575950734950400