The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552016000200105 |
Resumo: | Background: COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) is an initiative of an international multidisciplinary team of researchers who aim to improve the selection of outcome measurement instruments both in research and in clinical practice by developing tools for selecting the most appropriate available instrument. Method: In this paper these tools are described, i.e. the COSMIN taxonomy and definition of measurement properties; the COSMIN checklist to evaluate the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties; a search filter for finding studies on measurement properties; a protocol for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments; a database of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments; and a guideline for selecting outcome measurement instruments for Core Outcome Sets in clinical trials. Currently, we are updating the COSMIN checklist, particularly the standards for content validity studies. Also new standards for studies using Item Response Theory methods will be developed. Additionally, in the future we want to develop standards for studies on the quality of non-patient reported outcome measures, such as clinician-reported outcomes and performance-based outcomes. Conclusions: In summary, we plea for more standardization in the use of outcome measurement instruments, for conducting high quality systematic reviews on measurement instruments in which the best available outcome measurement instrument is recommended, and for stopping the use of poor outcome measurement instruments. |
id |
ABRA-FT-1_41ccfde369642a33dcd40e65fab347b1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1413-35552016000200105 |
network_acronym_str |
ABRA-FT-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrumentCOSMINmeasurement propertiesoutcome measuressystematic reviews of instrumentsoutcome selection Background: COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) is an initiative of an international multidisciplinary team of researchers who aim to improve the selection of outcome measurement instruments both in research and in clinical practice by developing tools for selecting the most appropriate available instrument. Method: In this paper these tools are described, i.e. the COSMIN taxonomy and definition of measurement properties; the COSMIN checklist to evaluate the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties; a search filter for finding studies on measurement properties; a protocol for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments; a database of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments; and a guideline for selecting outcome measurement instruments for Core Outcome Sets in clinical trials. Currently, we are updating the COSMIN checklist, particularly the standards for content validity studies. Also new standards for studies using Item Response Theory methods will be developed. Additionally, in the future we want to develop standards for studies on the quality of non-patient reported outcome measures, such as clinician-reported outcomes and performance-based outcomes. Conclusions: In summary, we plea for more standardization in the use of outcome measurement instruments, for conducting high quality systematic reviews on measurement instruments in which the best available outcome measurement instrument is recommended, and for stopping the use of poor outcome measurement instruments.Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia 2016-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552016000200105Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy v.20 n.2 2016reponame:Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapyinstname:Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)instacron:ABRAPG-FT10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMokkink,Lidwine B.Prinsen,Cecilia A. C.Bouter,Lex M.Vet,Henrica C. W. deTerwee,Caroline B.eng2016-07-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-35552016000200105Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rbfis/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcontato@rbf-bjpt.org.br||contato@rbf-bjpt.org.br1809-92461413-3555opendoar:2016-07-15T00:00Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy - Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument |
title |
The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument |
spellingShingle |
The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument Mokkink,Lidwine B. COSMIN measurement properties outcome measures systematic reviews of instruments outcome selection |
title_short |
The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument |
title_full |
The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument |
title_fullStr |
The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument |
title_full_unstemmed |
The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument |
title_sort |
The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument |
author |
Mokkink,Lidwine B. |
author_facet |
Mokkink,Lidwine B. Prinsen,Cecilia A. C. Bouter,Lex M. Vet,Henrica C. W. de Terwee,Caroline B. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Prinsen,Cecilia A. C. Bouter,Lex M. Vet,Henrica C. W. de Terwee,Caroline B. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mokkink,Lidwine B. Prinsen,Cecilia A. C. Bouter,Lex M. Vet,Henrica C. W. de Terwee,Caroline B. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
COSMIN measurement properties outcome measures systematic reviews of instruments outcome selection |
topic |
COSMIN measurement properties outcome measures systematic reviews of instruments outcome selection |
description |
Background: COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) is an initiative of an international multidisciplinary team of researchers who aim to improve the selection of outcome measurement instruments both in research and in clinical practice by developing tools for selecting the most appropriate available instrument. Method: In this paper these tools are described, i.e. the COSMIN taxonomy and definition of measurement properties; the COSMIN checklist to evaluate the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties; a search filter for finding studies on measurement properties; a protocol for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments; a database of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments; and a guideline for selecting outcome measurement instruments for Core Outcome Sets in clinical trials. Currently, we are updating the COSMIN checklist, particularly the standards for content validity studies. Also new standards for studies using Item Response Theory methods will be developed. Additionally, in the future we want to develop standards for studies on the quality of non-patient reported outcome measures, such as clinician-reported outcomes and performance-based outcomes. Conclusions: In summary, we plea for more standardization in the use of outcome measurement instruments, for conducting high quality systematic reviews on measurement instruments in which the best available outcome measurement instrument is recommended, and for stopping the use of poor outcome measurement instruments. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552016000200105 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552016000200105 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy v.20 n.2 2016 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy instname:Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT) instacron:ABRAPG-FT |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT) |
instacron_str |
ABRAPG-FT |
institution |
ABRAPG-FT |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy - Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
contato@rbf-bjpt.org.br||contato@rbf-bjpt.org.br |
_version_ |
1754575950734950400 |