Assessment of muscular strength with the modified sphygmomanometer test: what is the best method and source of outcome values?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza,Lucas A. C.
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Martins,Júlia C., Moura,Juliana B., Teixeira-Salmela,Luci F., Paula,Fátima V. R. De, Faria,Christina D. C. M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552014000200191
Resumo: BACKGROUND: Tests that are usually employed for the clinical assessment of muscular strength have notable disadvantages. The Modified Sphygmomanometer Test (MST) is a promising method because it is low-cost and provides objective measures.OBJECTIVES: To investigate the most adequate method and sources of outcome values for the assessment of strength with the MST.METHOD: Methodological study with 40 healthy adults (22.98±2.26 years), who did not practice physical activity regularly. The strength of the flexors and extensors of the elbow and knee, the handgrip of the dominant side and anterior trunk flexors were randomly assessed with portable dynamometers and the MST (bag and cuff adaptations, and sphygmomanometer without adaptation) by a single examiner. An independent examiner read and recorded the values. The sources of the investigated outcome values were the first trial and the means of two and three trials. One-way ANOVAs and Pearson Correlation Coefficients were used for the analyses (α=0.05).RESULTS: For the MST methods applied to assess all muscular groups, similar values were found for all sources of outcome values (0.01<F<0.26; 0.77<p<1.00) with significant and positive correlations between the measures obtained with the dynamometers (0.51<r<0.94; p<0.003).CONCLUSIONS: All MST methods showed adequate results for the assessment of strength in healthy individuals, and after familiarization, only one trial was sufficient to provide reliable measures. The sphygmomanometer without adaptation is not time consuming, compared to the other adaptations, and showed the capability of measuring higher values of strength. The bag method was easily trained to be used and stabilized.
id ABRA-FT-1_baa56323889c00c5929b8e9e11d49ed7
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-35552014000200191
network_acronym_str ABRA-FT-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
repository_id_str
spelling Assessment of muscular strength with the modified sphygmomanometer test: what is the best method and source of outcome values?rehabilitationmuscular strengthassessmentupper extremitylower extremitytrunkBACKGROUND: Tests that are usually employed for the clinical assessment of muscular strength have notable disadvantages. The Modified Sphygmomanometer Test (MST) is a promising method because it is low-cost and provides objective measures.OBJECTIVES: To investigate the most adequate method and sources of outcome values for the assessment of strength with the MST.METHOD: Methodological study with 40 healthy adults (22.98±2.26 years), who did not practice physical activity regularly. The strength of the flexors and extensors of the elbow and knee, the handgrip of the dominant side and anterior trunk flexors were randomly assessed with portable dynamometers and the MST (bag and cuff adaptations, and sphygmomanometer without adaptation) by a single examiner. An independent examiner read and recorded the values. The sources of the investigated outcome values were the first trial and the means of two and three trials. One-way ANOVAs and Pearson Correlation Coefficients were used for the analyses (α=0.05).RESULTS: For the MST methods applied to assess all muscular groups, similar values were found for all sources of outcome values (0.01<F<0.26; 0.77<p<1.00) with significant and positive correlations between the measures obtained with the dynamometers (0.51<r<0.94; p<0.003).CONCLUSIONS: All MST methods showed adequate results for the assessment of strength in healthy individuals, and after familiarization, only one trial was sufficient to provide reliable measures. The sphygmomanometer without adaptation is not time consuming, compared to the other adaptations, and showed the capability of measuring higher values of strength. The bag method was easily trained to be used and stabilized.Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia 2014-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552014000200191Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy v.18 n.2 2014reponame:Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapyinstname:Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)instacron:ABRAPG-FT10.1590/S1413-35552012005000149info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza,Lucas A. C.Martins,Júlia C.Moura,Juliana B.Teixeira-Salmela,Luci F.Paula,Fátima V. R. DeFaria,Christina D. C. M.eng2015-09-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-35552014000200191Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rbfis/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcontato@rbf-bjpt.org.br||contato@rbf-bjpt.org.br1809-92461413-3555opendoar:2015-09-04T00:00Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy - Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessment of muscular strength with the modified sphygmomanometer test: what is the best method and source of outcome values?
title Assessment of muscular strength with the modified sphygmomanometer test: what is the best method and source of outcome values?
spellingShingle Assessment of muscular strength with the modified sphygmomanometer test: what is the best method and source of outcome values?
Souza,Lucas A. C.
rehabilitation
muscular strength
assessment
upper extremity
lower extremity
trunk
title_short Assessment of muscular strength with the modified sphygmomanometer test: what is the best method and source of outcome values?
title_full Assessment of muscular strength with the modified sphygmomanometer test: what is the best method and source of outcome values?
title_fullStr Assessment of muscular strength with the modified sphygmomanometer test: what is the best method and source of outcome values?
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of muscular strength with the modified sphygmomanometer test: what is the best method and source of outcome values?
title_sort Assessment of muscular strength with the modified sphygmomanometer test: what is the best method and source of outcome values?
author Souza,Lucas A. C.
author_facet Souza,Lucas A. C.
Martins,Júlia C.
Moura,Juliana B.
Teixeira-Salmela,Luci F.
Paula,Fátima V. R. De
Faria,Christina D. C. M.
author_role author
author2 Martins,Júlia C.
Moura,Juliana B.
Teixeira-Salmela,Luci F.
Paula,Fátima V. R. De
Faria,Christina D. C. M.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza,Lucas A. C.
Martins,Júlia C.
Moura,Juliana B.
Teixeira-Salmela,Luci F.
Paula,Fátima V. R. De
Faria,Christina D. C. M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv rehabilitation
muscular strength
assessment
upper extremity
lower extremity
trunk
topic rehabilitation
muscular strength
assessment
upper extremity
lower extremity
trunk
description BACKGROUND: Tests that are usually employed for the clinical assessment of muscular strength have notable disadvantages. The Modified Sphygmomanometer Test (MST) is a promising method because it is low-cost and provides objective measures.OBJECTIVES: To investigate the most adequate method and sources of outcome values for the assessment of strength with the MST.METHOD: Methodological study with 40 healthy adults (22.98±2.26 years), who did not practice physical activity regularly. The strength of the flexors and extensors of the elbow and knee, the handgrip of the dominant side and anterior trunk flexors were randomly assessed with portable dynamometers and the MST (bag and cuff adaptations, and sphygmomanometer without adaptation) by a single examiner. An independent examiner read and recorded the values. The sources of the investigated outcome values were the first trial and the means of two and three trials. One-way ANOVAs and Pearson Correlation Coefficients were used for the analyses (α=0.05).RESULTS: For the MST methods applied to assess all muscular groups, similar values were found for all sources of outcome values (0.01<F<0.26; 0.77<p<1.00) with significant and positive correlations between the measures obtained with the dynamometers (0.51<r<0.94; p<0.003).CONCLUSIONS: All MST methods showed adequate results for the assessment of strength in healthy individuals, and after familiarization, only one trial was sufficient to provide reliable measures. The sphygmomanometer without adaptation is not time consuming, compared to the other adaptations, and showed the capability of measuring higher values of strength. The bag method was easily trained to be used and stabilized.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552014000200191
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552014000200191
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1413-35552012005000149
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy v.18 n.2 2014
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
instname:Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)
instacron:ABRAPG-FT
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)
instacron_str ABRAPG-FT
institution ABRAPG-FT
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
collection Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy - Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv contato@rbf-bjpt.org.br||contato@rbf-bjpt.org.br
_version_ 1754575949707345920