Prospective randomized controlled trial of the closure of gastrojejunal anastomosis in RYGB with absorbable and inabsorbable thread

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Flamini Júnior, Mário
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Zotarelli-Filho, Idiberto José, Quadros, Luiz Gustavo de, Galvão Neto, Manoel, Carmo, Maurício Vecchi, Buissa, Maisa Ramos, Kaiser Junior, Roberto Luiz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Journal of Nutrology (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ijn.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/ijn/article/view/221
Resumo: Introduction: The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is, currently, the most performed technique in Brazil. Suture threads are classified according to their degradation properties. Objective: To analyze the influence on the size of the gastrojejunal anastomosis performed in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery, as well as the main complications with the use of absorbable or inabsorbable thread. Methods: This study followed a prospective and randomized clinical trial, initially with 40 participants, with only 37 participants being duly selected, 19 of whom underwent gastrojejunostomy closure with an absorbable (Abs) polydioxanone suture (PDS II®) and 18 with the inabsorbable (Inb) ETHIBOND®. Statistical analysis was performed using the ANOVA and logistic regression tools (p<0.05 significant). Results: General complications and Upper Digestive Endoscopy (UDE) were less frequent at the end of 12 months in both groups. At the end of twelve months, the number of complications of the Inb thread decreased considerably, while the number of complications of the Abs thread showed an increase in other complications, including marginal ulcer and intrusive thread. Despite this, there was no significant difference between groups in terms of total weight loss. There was no statistically significant difference between the final values of the anastomotic diameter. The percentage of weight loss over the 12 months was 33.77 ± 6.97% for the Inb group and 36.10 ± 4.89% for the Abs group (p<0.05). Conclusion: Both suture threads (Inb and Abs) presented similar complications and did not present significant differences between the values of weight, gastrojejunal anastomosis, and pouch.
id ABRAN-1_affa5b037499d33a34c0fa59f9313cfa
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.ijn.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/221
network_acronym_str ABRAN-1
network_name_str International Journal of Nutrology (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Prospective randomized controlled trial of the closure of gastrojejunal anastomosis in RYGB with absorbable and inabsorbable threadRoux-en-Y gastric bypassGastrojejunal anastomosisAbsorbable threadInabsorbable threadComplicationsIntroduction: The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is, currently, the most performed technique in Brazil. Suture threads are classified according to their degradation properties. Objective: To analyze the influence on the size of the gastrojejunal anastomosis performed in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery, as well as the main complications with the use of absorbable or inabsorbable thread. Methods: This study followed a prospective and randomized clinical trial, initially with 40 participants, with only 37 participants being duly selected, 19 of whom underwent gastrojejunostomy closure with an absorbable (Abs) polydioxanone suture (PDS II®) and 18 with the inabsorbable (Inb) ETHIBOND®. Statistical analysis was performed using the ANOVA and logistic regression tools (p<0.05 significant). Results: General complications and Upper Digestive Endoscopy (UDE) were less frequent at the end of 12 months in both groups. At the end of twelve months, the number of complications of the Inb thread decreased considerably, while the number of complications of the Abs thread showed an increase in other complications, including marginal ulcer and intrusive thread. Despite this, there was no significant difference between groups in terms of total weight loss. There was no statistically significant difference between the final values of the anastomotic diameter. The percentage of weight loss over the 12 months was 33.77 ± 6.97% for the Inb group and 36.10 ± 4.89% for the Abs group (p<0.05). Conclusion: Both suture threads (Inb and Abs) presented similar complications and did not present significant differences between the values of weight, gastrojejunal anastomosis, and pouch.MetaScience Press2022-04-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttps://ijn.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/ijn/article/view/22110.54448/ijn22204International Journal of Nutrology; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2022): International Journal of Nutrology (IJN) - May 20222595-28541984-301110.54448/ijn222reponame:International Journal of Nutrology (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Nutrologia (ABRAN)instacron:ABRANenghttps://ijn.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/ijn/article/view/221/217Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Nutrologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFlamini Júnior, MárioZotarelli-Filho, Idiberto JoséQuadros, Luiz Gustavo deGalvão Neto, ManoelCarmo, Maurício VecchiBuissa, Maisa RamosKaiser Junior, Roberto Luiz2022-04-05T18:04:02Zoai:ojs2.ijn.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/221Revistahttps://ijn.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/ijnONGhttps://ijn.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/ijn/oaiijn@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com || editorchief@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com10.544482595-28541984-3011opendoar:2022-04-05T18:04:02International Journal of Nutrology (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Nutrologia (ABRAN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prospective randomized controlled trial of the closure of gastrojejunal anastomosis in RYGB with absorbable and inabsorbable thread
title Prospective randomized controlled trial of the closure of gastrojejunal anastomosis in RYGB with absorbable and inabsorbable thread
spellingShingle Prospective randomized controlled trial of the closure of gastrojejunal anastomosis in RYGB with absorbable and inabsorbable thread
Flamini Júnior, Mário
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Gastrojejunal anastomosis
Absorbable thread
Inabsorbable thread
Complications
title_short Prospective randomized controlled trial of the closure of gastrojejunal anastomosis in RYGB with absorbable and inabsorbable thread
title_full Prospective randomized controlled trial of the closure of gastrojejunal anastomosis in RYGB with absorbable and inabsorbable thread
title_fullStr Prospective randomized controlled trial of the closure of gastrojejunal anastomosis in RYGB with absorbable and inabsorbable thread
title_full_unstemmed Prospective randomized controlled trial of the closure of gastrojejunal anastomosis in RYGB with absorbable and inabsorbable thread
title_sort Prospective randomized controlled trial of the closure of gastrojejunal anastomosis in RYGB with absorbable and inabsorbable thread
author Flamini Júnior, Mário
author_facet Flamini Júnior, Mário
Zotarelli-Filho, Idiberto José
Quadros, Luiz Gustavo de
Galvão Neto, Manoel
Carmo, Maurício Vecchi
Buissa, Maisa Ramos
Kaiser Junior, Roberto Luiz
author_role author
author2 Zotarelli-Filho, Idiberto José
Quadros, Luiz Gustavo de
Galvão Neto, Manoel
Carmo, Maurício Vecchi
Buissa, Maisa Ramos
Kaiser Junior, Roberto Luiz
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Flamini Júnior, Mário
Zotarelli-Filho, Idiberto José
Quadros, Luiz Gustavo de
Galvão Neto, Manoel
Carmo, Maurício Vecchi
Buissa, Maisa Ramos
Kaiser Junior, Roberto Luiz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Gastrojejunal anastomosis
Absorbable thread
Inabsorbable thread
Complications
topic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Gastrojejunal anastomosis
Absorbable thread
Inabsorbable thread
Complications
description Introduction: The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is, currently, the most performed technique in Brazil. Suture threads are classified according to their degradation properties. Objective: To analyze the influence on the size of the gastrojejunal anastomosis performed in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery, as well as the main complications with the use of absorbable or inabsorbable thread. Methods: This study followed a prospective and randomized clinical trial, initially with 40 participants, with only 37 participants being duly selected, 19 of whom underwent gastrojejunostomy closure with an absorbable (Abs) polydioxanone suture (PDS II®) and 18 with the inabsorbable (Inb) ETHIBOND®. Statistical analysis was performed using the ANOVA and logistic regression tools (p<0.05 significant). Results: General complications and Upper Digestive Endoscopy (UDE) were less frequent at the end of 12 months in both groups. At the end of twelve months, the number of complications of the Inb thread decreased considerably, while the number of complications of the Abs thread showed an increase in other complications, including marginal ulcer and intrusive thread. Despite this, there was no significant difference between groups in terms of total weight loss. There was no statistically significant difference between the final values of the anastomotic diameter. The percentage of weight loss over the 12 months was 33.77 ± 6.97% for the Inb group and 36.10 ± 4.89% for the Abs group (p<0.05). Conclusion: Both suture threads (Inb and Abs) presented similar complications and did not present significant differences between the values of weight, gastrojejunal anastomosis, and pouch.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ijn.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/ijn/article/view/221
10.54448/ijn22204
url https://ijn.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/ijn/article/view/221
identifier_str_mv 10.54448/ijn22204
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ijn.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/ijn/article/view/221/217
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Nutrology
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Nutrology
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MetaScience Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MetaScience Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Nutrology; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2022): International Journal of Nutrology (IJN) - May 2022
2595-2854
1984-3011
10.54448/ijn222
reponame:International Journal of Nutrology (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Nutrologia (ABRAN)
instacron:ABRAN
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Nutrologia (ABRAN)
instacron_str ABRAN
institution ABRAN
reponame_str International Journal of Nutrology (Online)
collection International Journal of Nutrology (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Journal of Nutrology (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Nutrologia (ABRAN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ijn@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com || editorchief@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com
_version_ 1792204588327108608