Tactile and smell/taste sensitivity and accepted foods according to sensory properties: a cross-sectional study with children from a reference center in feeding difficulties

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ricci, Raquel
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Maximino, Priscila, Nogueira, Luana Romão, Paula, Nathália Gioia de, Fussi, Camila, Fisberg, Mauro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Journal of Nutrology (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ijn.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/ijn/article/view/352
Resumo: Introduction: Children with feeding difficulties are more likely to present sensory sensitivities and detect meaningful changes in the sensory properties of foods and reject new foods. Objective: The aims of the study were to identify the top food sources of energy according to children sensitivity profile, and investigate whether there are differences between children sensitivity profile and number of food categories consumed according to their sensory properties. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study with 65 children recruited from an outpatient clinic for children with feeding difficulties, Brazil. Socio-demographics and weight status were included to characterize the sample. Sensory processing using the adapted and validated Short Sensory Profile (SSP) and included the tactile and smell/taste processing domains. Parents reported the number and sources of foods/preparations accepted/consumed by their children. Foods accepted were classified according to the adapted “What We Eat in Latin American - WWELA” classification system. Four aspects of sensory properties were subjectively evaluated for all foods accepted in taste, color, consistency, and texture. Results: Most of the children with tactile and smell/taste sensitivities were classified as combined probable/definite differences, with 52.3% and 92.3%, respectively. Average number of foods categories accepted was 18.81. Rice, whole milk, and banana were among the top food sources for each of sensory processing domains examined. Only children in smell/taste sensitivity showed significant differences for consuming more fibrous foods, with children under typical performance accepting more foods (28.50 2.12) than combined probable/definite differences (16.86± 5.25). Conclusion: Child sensory processing aspects are important when considering the exposure in relation to child acceptance of foods.
id ABRAN-1_e7ac64a073d2ac53145c50348f44e9a8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.ijn.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/352
network_acronym_str ABRAN-1
network_name_str International Journal of Nutrology (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Tactile and smell/taste sensitivity and accepted foods according to sensory properties: a cross-sectional study with children from a reference center in feeding difficultiesFood fussinessChildSmellTasteIntroduction: Children with feeding difficulties are more likely to present sensory sensitivities and detect meaningful changes in the sensory properties of foods and reject new foods. Objective: The aims of the study were to identify the top food sources of energy according to children sensitivity profile, and investigate whether there are differences between children sensitivity profile and number of food categories consumed according to their sensory properties. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study with 65 children recruited from an outpatient clinic for children with feeding difficulties, Brazil. Socio-demographics and weight status were included to characterize the sample. Sensory processing using the adapted and validated Short Sensory Profile (SSP) and included the tactile and smell/taste processing domains. Parents reported the number and sources of foods/preparations accepted/consumed by their children. Foods accepted were classified according to the adapted “What We Eat in Latin American - WWELA” classification system. Four aspects of sensory properties were subjectively evaluated for all foods accepted in taste, color, consistency, and texture. Results: Most of the children with tactile and smell/taste sensitivities were classified as combined probable/definite differences, with 52.3% and 92.3%, respectively. Average number of foods categories accepted was 18.81. Rice, whole milk, and banana were among the top food sources for each of sensory processing domains examined. Only children in smell/taste sensitivity showed significant differences for consuming more fibrous foods, with children under typical performance accepting more foods (28.50 2.12) than combined probable/definite differences (16.86± 5.25). Conclusion: Child sensory processing aspects are important when considering the exposure in relation to child acceptance of foods.MetaScience Press2024-04-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttps://ijn.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/ijn/article/view/35210.54448/ijn24202International Journal of Nutrology; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2024): International Journal of Nutrology (IJN) - May 20242595-28541984-3011reponame:International Journal of Nutrology (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Nutrologia (ABRAN)instacron:ABRANenghttps://ijn.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/ijn/article/view/352/325Copyright (c) 2024 Raquel Ricci, Priscila Maximino, Luana Romão Nogueira, Nathália Gioia de Paula, Camila Fussi, Mauro Fisberghttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRicci, RaquelMaximino, PriscilaNogueira, Luana RomãoPaula, Nathália Gioia deFussi, CamilaFisberg, Mauro2024-04-03T21:09:35Zoai:ojs2.ijn.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/352Revistahttps://ijn.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/ijnONGhttps://ijn.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/ijn/oaiijn@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com || editorchief@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com10.544482595-28541984-3011opendoar:2024-04-03T21:09:35International Journal of Nutrology (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Nutrologia (ABRAN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Tactile and smell/taste sensitivity and accepted foods according to sensory properties: a cross-sectional study with children from a reference center in feeding difficulties
title Tactile and smell/taste sensitivity and accepted foods according to sensory properties: a cross-sectional study with children from a reference center in feeding difficulties
spellingShingle Tactile and smell/taste sensitivity and accepted foods according to sensory properties: a cross-sectional study with children from a reference center in feeding difficulties
Ricci, Raquel
Food fussiness
Child
Smell
Taste
title_short Tactile and smell/taste sensitivity and accepted foods according to sensory properties: a cross-sectional study with children from a reference center in feeding difficulties
title_full Tactile and smell/taste sensitivity and accepted foods according to sensory properties: a cross-sectional study with children from a reference center in feeding difficulties
title_fullStr Tactile and smell/taste sensitivity and accepted foods according to sensory properties: a cross-sectional study with children from a reference center in feeding difficulties
title_full_unstemmed Tactile and smell/taste sensitivity and accepted foods according to sensory properties: a cross-sectional study with children from a reference center in feeding difficulties
title_sort Tactile and smell/taste sensitivity and accepted foods according to sensory properties: a cross-sectional study with children from a reference center in feeding difficulties
author Ricci, Raquel
author_facet Ricci, Raquel
Maximino, Priscila
Nogueira, Luana Romão
Paula, Nathália Gioia de
Fussi, Camila
Fisberg, Mauro
author_role author
author2 Maximino, Priscila
Nogueira, Luana Romão
Paula, Nathália Gioia de
Fussi, Camila
Fisberg, Mauro
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ricci, Raquel
Maximino, Priscila
Nogueira, Luana Romão
Paula, Nathália Gioia de
Fussi, Camila
Fisberg, Mauro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Food fussiness
Child
Smell
Taste
topic Food fussiness
Child
Smell
Taste
description Introduction: Children with feeding difficulties are more likely to present sensory sensitivities and detect meaningful changes in the sensory properties of foods and reject new foods. Objective: The aims of the study were to identify the top food sources of energy according to children sensitivity profile, and investigate whether there are differences between children sensitivity profile and number of food categories consumed according to their sensory properties. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study with 65 children recruited from an outpatient clinic for children with feeding difficulties, Brazil. Socio-demographics and weight status were included to characterize the sample. Sensory processing using the adapted and validated Short Sensory Profile (SSP) and included the tactile and smell/taste processing domains. Parents reported the number and sources of foods/preparations accepted/consumed by their children. Foods accepted were classified according to the adapted “What We Eat in Latin American - WWELA” classification system. Four aspects of sensory properties were subjectively evaluated for all foods accepted in taste, color, consistency, and texture. Results: Most of the children with tactile and smell/taste sensitivities were classified as combined probable/definite differences, with 52.3% and 92.3%, respectively. Average number of foods categories accepted was 18.81. Rice, whole milk, and banana were among the top food sources for each of sensory processing domains examined. Only children in smell/taste sensitivity showed significant differences for consuming more fibrous foods, with children under typical performance accepting more foods (28.50 2.12) than combined probable/definite differences (16.86± 5.25). Conclusion: Child sensory processing aspects are important when considering the exposure in relation to child acceptance of foods.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-04-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ijn.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/ijn/article/view/352
10.54448/ijn24202
url https://ijn.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/ijn/article/view/352
identifier_str_mv 10.54448/ijn24202
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ijn.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/ijn/article/view/352/325
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MetaScience Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MetaScience Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Nutrology; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2024): International Journal of Nutrology (IJN) - May 2024
2595-2854
1984-3011
reponame:International Journal of Nutrology (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Nutrologia (ABRAN)
instacron:ABRAN
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Nutrologia (ABRAN)
instacron_str ABRAN
institution ABRAN
reponame_str International Journal of Nutrology (Online)
collection International Journal of Nutrology (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Journal of Nutrology (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Nutrologia (ABRAN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ijn@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com || editorchief@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com
_version_ 1797041990909558784