Ethics, collective health, qualitative health research and social justice
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232015000902631 |
Resumo: | Abstract The scientific field is characterized by the disputes about the delimitation of the field problems, methods and theories that can be considered scientific. The recognition that it is not neutral, that a researcher is a moral subject, and its practices are moral ones, entail that moral reflections, that is, ethics, should be a core process of every researcher. Therefore ethics is not a heteronomous issue, and cannot be reduced to guidelines. In the first part of this article we examine the need to develop an open approach to the construction of guidelines in a plural scientific field that must take into account diverse paradigms, which implies different values. The Brazilian process of writing guidelines on research ethics for social science and humanities in the context of the Ministry of Health will be discussed as an example. In the second part we expand the analysis of research ethics posing a perspective that integrates qualitative research, social justice and discipline trends. In the final considerations we explore the possibility that research ethics is better discussed taking into account the ontology, epistemology and political values rather than one specific methodological approach or from a dichotomic perspective between biomedicine versus social science and humanities. |
id |
ABRASCO-2_7c9ac4fe5f082d81ae1b5f252c7ec693 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1413-81232015000902631 |
network_acronym_str |
ABRASCO-2 |
network_name_str |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Ethics, collective health, qualitative health research and social justiceResearch ethicsSocial justiceQualitative researchBioethicsAbstract The scientific field is characterized by the disputes about the delimitation of the field problems, methods and theories that can be considered scientific. The recognition that it is not neutral, that a researcher is a moral subject, and its practices are moral ones, entail that moral reflections, that is, ethics, should be a core process of every researcher. Therefore ethics is not a heteronomous issue, and cannot be reduced to guidelines. In the first part of this article we examine the need to develop an open approach to the construction of guidelines in a plural scientific field that must take into account diverse paradigms, which implies different values. The Brazilian process of writing guidelines on research ethics for social science and humanities in the context of the Ministry of Health will be discussed as an example. In the second part we expand the analysis of research ethics posing a perspective that integrates qualitative research, social justice and discipline trends. In the final considerations we explore the possibility that research ethics is better discussed taking into account the ontology, epistemology and political values rather than one specific methodological approach or from a dichotomic perspective between biomedicine versus social science and humanities.ABRASCO - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva2015-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232015000902631Ciência & Saúde Coletiva v.20 n.9 2015reponame:Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)instacron:ABRASCO10.1590/1413-81232015209.05672015info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGuerriero,Iara Coelho ZitoCorrea,Fernando Peñarandaeng2016-03-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-81232015000902631Revistahttp://www.cienciaesaudecoletiva.com.brhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||cienciasaudecoletiva@fiocruz.br1678-45611413-8123opendoar:2016-03-30T00:00Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ethics, collective health, qualitative health research and social justice |
title |
Ethics, collective health, qualitative health research and social justice |
spellingShingle |
Ethics, collective health, qualitative health research and social justice Guerriero,Iara Coelho Zito Research ethics Social justice Qualitative research Bioethics |
title_short |
Ethics, collective health, qualitative health research and social justice |
title_full |
Ethics, collective health, qualitative health research and social justice |
title_fullStr |
Ethics, collective health, qualitative health research and social justice |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ethics, collective health, qualitative health research and social justice |
title_sort |
Ethics, collective health, qualitative health research and social justice |
author |
Guerriero,Iara Coelho Zito |
author_facet |
Guerriero,Iara Coelho Zito Correa,Fernando Peñaranda |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Correa,Fernando Peñaranda |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guerriero,Iara Coelho Zito Correa,Fernando Peñaranda |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Research ethics Social justice Qualitative research Bioethics |
topic |
Research ethics Social justice Qualitative research Bioethics |
description |
Abstract The scientific field is characterized by the disputes about the delimitation of the field problems, methods and theories that can be considered scientific. The recognition that it is not neutral, that a researcher is a moral subject, and its practices are moral ones, entail that moral reflections, that is, ethics, should be a core process of every researcher. Therefore ethics is not a heteronomous issue, and cannot be reduced to guidelines. In the first part of this article we examine the need to develop an open approach to the construction of guidelines in a plural scientific field that must take into account diverse paradigms, which implies different values. The Brazilian process of writing guidelines on research ethics for social science and humanities in the context of the Ministry of Health will be discussed as an example. In the second part we expand the analysis of research ethics posing a perspective that integrates qualitative research, social justice and discipline trends. In the final considerations we explore the possibility that research ethics is better discussed taking into account the ontology, epistemology and political values rather than one specific methodological approach or from a dichotomic perspective between biomedicine versus social science and humanities. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232015000902631 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232015000902631 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1413-81232015209.05672015 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABRASCO - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABRASCO - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva v.20 n.9 2015 reponame:Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO) instacron:ABRASCO |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO) |
instacron_str |
ABRASCO |
institution |
ABRASCO |
reponame_str |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online) |
collection |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||cienciasaudecoletiva@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1754213037589397504 |