Ethics, collective health, qualitative health research and social justice

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Guerriero,Iara Coelho Zito
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Correa,Fernando Peñaranda
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232015000902631
Resumo: Abstract The scientific field is characterized by the disputes about the delimitation of the field problems, methods and theories that can be considered scientific. The recognition that it is not neutral, that a researcher is a moral subject, and its practices are moral ones, entail that moral reflections, that is, ethics, should be a core process of every researcher. Therefore ethics is not a heteronomous issue, and cannot be reduced to guidelines. In the first part of this article we examine the need to develop an open approach to the construction of guidelines in a plural scientific field that must take into account diverse paradigms, which implies different values. The Brazilian process of writing guidelines on research ethics for social science and humanities in the context of the Ministry of Health will be discussed as an example. In the second part we expand the analysis of research ethics posing a perspective that integrates qualitative research, social justice and discipline trends. In the final considerations we explore the possibility that research ethics is better discussed taking into account the ontology, epistemology and political values rather than one specific methodological approach or from a dichotomic perspective between biomedicine versus social science and humanities.
id ABRASCO-2_7c9ac4fe5f082d81ae1b5f252c7ec693
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-81232015000902631
network_acronym_str ABRASCO-2
network_name_str Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Ethics, collective health, qualitative health research and social justiceResearch ethicsSocial justiceQualitative researchBioethicsAbstract The scientific field is characterized by the disputes about the delimitation of the field problems, methods and theories that can be considered scientific. The recognition that it is not neutral, that a researcher is a moral subject, and its practices are moral ones, entail that moral reflections, that is, ethics, should be a core process of every researcher. Therefore ethics is not a heteronomous issue, and cannot be reduced to guidelines. In the first part of this article we examine the need to develop an open approach to the construction of guidelines in a plural scientific field that must take into account diverse paradigms, which implies different values. The Brazilian process of writing guidelines on research ethics for social science and humanities in the context of the Ministry of Health will be discussed as an example. In the second part we expand the analysis of research ethics posing a perspective that integrates qualitative research, social justice and discipline trends. In the final considerations we explore the possibility that research ethics is better discussed taking into account the ontology, epistemology and political values rather than one specific methodological approach or from a dichotomic perspective between biomedicine versus social science and humanities.ABRASCO - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva2015-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232015000902631Ciência & Saúde Coletiva v.20 n.9 2015reponame:Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)instacron:ABRASCO10.1590/1413-81232015209.05672015info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGuerriero,Iara Coelho ZitoCorrea,Fernando Peñarandaeng2016-03-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-81232015000902631Revistahttp://www.cienciaesaudecoletiva.com.brhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||cienciasaudecoletiva@fiocruz.br1678-45611413-8123opendoar:2016-03-30T00:00Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ethics, collective health, qualitative health research and social justice
title Ethics, collective health, qualitative health research and social justice
spellingShingle Ethics, collective health, qualitative health research and social justice
Guerriero,Iara Coelho Zito
Research ethics
Social justice
Qualitative research
Bioethics
title_short Ethics, collective health, qualitative health research and social justice
title_full Ethics, collective health, qualitative health research and social justice
title_fullStr Ethics, collective health, qualitative health research and social justice
title_full_unstemmed Ethics, collective health, qualitative health research and social justice
title_sort Ethics, collective health, qualitative health research and social justice
author Guerriero,Iara Coelho Zito
author_facet Guerriero,Iara Coelho Zito
Correa,Fernando Peñaranda
author_role author
author2 Correa,Fernando Peñaranda
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Guerriero,Iara Coelho Zito
Correa,Fernando Peñaranda
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Research ethics
Social justice
Qualitative research
Bioethics
topic Research ethics
Social justice
Qualitative research
Bioethics
description Abstract The scientific field is characterized by the disputes about the delimitation of the field problems, methods and theories that can be considered scientific. The recognition that it is not neutral, that a researcher is a moral subject, and its practices are moral ones, entail that moral reflections, that is, ethics, should be a core process of every researcher. Therefore ethics is not a heteronomous issue, and cannot be reduced to guidelines. In the first part of this article we examine the need to develop an open approach to the construction of guidelines in a plural scientific field that must take into account diverse paradigms, which implies different values. The Brazilian process of writing guidelines on research ethics for social science and humanities in the context of the Ministry of Health will be discussed as an example. In the second part we expand the analysis of research ethics posing a perspective that integrates qualitative research, social justice and discipline trends. In the final considerations we explore the possibility that research ethics is better discussed taking into account the ontology, epistemology and political values rather than one specific methodological approach or from a dichotomic perspective between biomedicine versus social science and humanities.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232015000902631
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232015000902631
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1413-81232015209.05672015
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRASCO - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRASCO - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência & Saúde Coletiva v.20 n.9 2015
reponame:Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)
instacron:ABRASCO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)
instacron_str ABRASCO
institution ABRASCO
reponame_str Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)
collection Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cienciasaudecoletiva@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1754213037589397504