Estimation of potential groundwater recharge by a drywell in sandy clay soil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Justino,Eliane Aparecida
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Failache,Moisés Furtado, Barbassa,Ademir Paceli
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: RBRH (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2318-03312021000100202
Resumo: ABSTRACT We estimated the potential groundwater recharge (Rpot) of a drywell that receives, temporarily stores, and infiltrates direct surface runoff from a contribution area (180.5 m2) comprising a roof and a cemented floor. The Rpot for traditional rainwater management and for similar contribution area but covered with grass was also estimated for comparison. Our methodology involved the use of water budget equation, monitoring of rainfall and soil water content up to 1.92 m depth, estimation of drywell overflow using the modified Puls model, and determination of actual evapotranspiration using water stress coefficient in 2017 and 2018. Results revealed that the Rpot for drywell was 83.3% of the precipitated volume, 2.22 times higher than that of the grass-covered area (37.6%) given the increased area for evapotranspiration in the latter. In turn, the traditional urban drainage system did not demonstrate potential of groundwater recharge. Therefore, the drywell contributes significantly to groundwater recharge apart from serving as local flood control.
id ABRH-1_6fffe43af002ea5c128f0e3914abac1e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2318-03312021000100202
network_acronym_str ABRH-1
network_name_str RBRH (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Estimation of potential groundwater recharge by a drywell in sandy clay soilDrywellLow-impact developmentBest management practicesArtificial groundwater rechargeABSTRACT We estimated the potential groundwater recharge (Rpot) of a drywell that receives, temporarily stores, and infiltrates direct surface runoff from a contribution area (180.5 m2) comprising a roof and a cemented floor. The Rpot for traditional rainwater management and for similar contribution area but covered with grass was also estimated for comparison. Our methodology involved the use of water budget equation, monitoring of rainfall and soil water content up to 1.92 m depth, estimation of drywell overflow using the modified Puls model, and determination of actual evapotranspiration using water stress coefficient in 2017 and 2018. Results revealed that the Rpot for drywell was 83.3% of the precipitated volume, 2.22 times higher than that of the grass-covered area (37.6%) given the increased area for evapotranspiration in the latter. In turn, the traditional urban drainage system did not demonstrate potential of groundwater recharge. Therefore, the drywell contributes significantly to groundwater recharge apart from serving as local flood control.Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2318-03312021000100202RBRH v.26 2021reponame:RBRH (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)instacron:ABRH10.1590/2318-0331.262120200117info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJustino,Eliane AparecidaFailache,Moisés FurtadoBarbassa,Ademir Pacelieng2021-02-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2318-03312021000100202Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rbrh/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbrh@abrh.org.br2318-03311414-381Xopendoar:2021-02-26T00:00RBRH (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Estimation of potential groundwater recharge by a drywell in sandy clay soil
title Estimation of potential groundwater recharge by a drywell in sandy clay soil
spellingShingle Estimation of potential groundwater recharge by a drywell in sandy clay soil
Justino,Eliane Aparecida
Drywell
Low-impact development
Best management practices
Artificial groundwater recharge
title_short Estimation of potential groundwater recharge by a drywell in sandy clay soil
title_full Estimation of potential groundwater recharge by a drywell in sandy clay soil
title_fullStr Estimation of potential groundwater recharge by a drywell in sandy clay soil
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of potential groundwater recharge by a drywell in sandy clay soil
title_sort Estimation of potential groundwater recharge by a drywell in sandy clay soil
author Justino,Eliane Aparecida
author_facet Justino,Eliane Aparecida
Failache,Moisés Furtado
Barbassa,Ademir Paceli
author_role author
author2 Failache,Moisés Furtado
Barbassa,Ademir Paceli
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Justino,Eliane Aparecida
Failache,Moisés Furtado
Barbassa,Ademir Paceli
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Drywell
Low-impact development
Best management practices
Artificial groundwater recharge
topic Drywell
Low-impact development
Best management practices
Artificial groundwater recharge
description ABSTRACT We estimated the potential groundwater recharge (Rpot) of a drywell that receives, temporarily stores, and infiltrates direct surface runoff from a contribution area (180.5 m2) comprising a roof and a cemented floor. The Rpot for traditional rainwater management and for similar contribution area but covered with grass was also estimated for comparison. Our methodology involved the use of water budget equation, monitoring of rainfall and soil water content up to 1.92 m depth, estimation of drywell overflow using the modified Puls model, and determination of actual evapotranspiration using water stress coefficient in 2017 and 2018. Results revealed that the Rpot for drywell was 83.3% of the precipitated volume, 2.22 times higher than that of the grass-covered area (37.6%) given the increased area for evapotranspiration in the latter. In turn, the traditional urban drainage system did not demonstrate potential of groundwater recharge. Therefore, the drywell contributes significantly to groundwater recharge apart from serving as local flood control.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2318-03312021000100202
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2318-03312021000100202
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2318-0331.262120200117
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv RBRH v.26 2021
reponame:RBRH (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)
instacron:ABRH
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)
instacron_str ABRH
institution ABRH
reponame_str RBRH (Online)
collection RBRH (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv RBRH (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbrh@abrh.org.br
_version_ 1754734702247280640