Analysis of methodologies for determination of the economic pipe diameter

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gama,Cléber Henrique de Araújo
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Souza,Vladimir Caramori Borges de, Callado,Nélia Henriques
Tipo de documento: Relatório
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: RBRH (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2318-03312019000100402
Resumo: ABSTRACT The design of water distribution systems includes, above all, the determination of the pipe size that meets the requirements of the system and brings reduced annual costs of installation and operation. Among the existing methodologies for the economic pipe diameter determination, Bresse’s equation is still common among designers. This work aims to analyze the efficiency of Bresse’s equation, the MBPW and the MLVPC, comparing them with the MREC. We recommend that the designers do not use the MBPW and the MLVPC. When referring to water distribution systems of small size, it is possible to use the equation of Bresse, as long as it is used with a proper value for its coefficient k. For HDPE, we propose k = 1.17 or k = 1.18. For PVC DEFOFO and GFRP, we suggest the range of 1.19 to 1.23 and 1.29 to 1.32, respectively. Regarding the water distribution systems of bigger dimensions, we recommend the use of MREC as the methodology for the economic pipe diameter determination, due to the impossibility of finding an appropriate value for the Bresse’s equation coefficient.
id ABRH-1_803519645f8dedbdb4b30879a0bed662
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2318-03312019000100402
network_acronym_str ABRH-1
network_name_str RBRH (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Analysis of methodologies for determination of the economic pipe diameterEconomic pipe diameterBresse’s equationWater distribution systems designABSTRACT The design of water distribution systems includes, above all, the determination of the pipe size that meets the requirements of the system and brings reduced annual costs of installation and operation. Among the existing methodologies for the economic pipe diameter determination, Bresse’s equation is still common among designers. This work aims to analyze the efficiency of Bresse’s equation, the MBPW and the MLVPC, comparing them with the MREC. We recommend that the designers do not use the MBPW and the MLVPC. When referring to water distribution systems of small size, it is possible to use the equation of Bresse, as long as it is used with a proper value for its coefficient k. For HDPE, we propose k = 1.17 or k = 1.18. For PVC DEFOFO and GFRP, we suggest the range of 1.19 to 1.23 and 1.29 to 1.32, respectively. Regarding the water distribution systems of bigger dimensions, we recommend the use of MREC as the methodology for the economic pipe diameter determination, due to the impossibility of finding an appropriate value for the Bresse’s equation coefficient.Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/reportinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2318-03312019000100402RBRH v.24 2019reponame:RBRH (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)instacron:ABRH10.1590/2318-0331.241920180148info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGama,Cléber Henrique de AraújoSouza,Vladimir Caramori Borges deCallado,Nélia Henriqueseng2019-08-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2318-03312019000100402Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rbrh/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbrh@abrh.org.br2318-03311414-381Xopendoar:2019-08-06T00:00RBRH (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of methodologies for determination of the economic pipe diameter
title Analysis of methodologies for determination of the economic pipe diameter
spellingShingle Analysis of methodologies for determination of the economic pipe diameter
Gama,Cléber Henrique de Araújo
Economic pipe diameter
Bresse’s equation
Water distribution systems design
title_short Analysis of methodologies for determination of the economic pipe diameter
title_full Analysis of methodologies for determination of the economic pipe diameter
title_fullStr Analysis of methodologies for determination of the economic pipe diameter
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of methodologies for determination of the economic pipe diameter
title_sort Analysis of methodologies for determination of the economic pipe diameter
author Gama,Cléber Henrique de Araújo
author_facet Gama,Cléber Henrique de Araújo
Souza,Vladimir Caramori Borges de
Callado,Nélia Henriques
author_role author
author2 Souza,Vladimir Caramori Borges de
Callado,Nélia Henriques
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gama,Cléber Henrique de Araújo
Souza,Vladimir Caramori Borges de
Callado,Nélia Henriques
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Economic pipe diameter
Bresse’s equation
Water distribution systems design
topic Economic pipe diameter
Bresse’s equation
Water distribution systems design
description ABSTRACT The design of water distribution systems includes, above all, the determination of the pipe size that meets the requirements of the system and brings reduced annual costs of installation and operation. Among the existing methodologies for the economic pipe diameter determination, Bresse’s equation is still common among designers. This work aims to analyze the efficiency of Bresse’s equation, the MBPW and the MLVPC, comparing them with the MREC. We recommend that the designers do not use the MBPW and the MLVPC. When referring to water distribution systems of small size, it is possible to use the equation of Bresse, as long as it is used with a proper value for its coefficient k. For HDPE, we propose k = 1.17 or k = 1.18. For PVC DEFOFO and GFRP, we suggest the range of 1.19 to 1.23 and 1.29 to 1.32, respectively. Regarding the water distribution systems of bigger dimensions, we recommend the use of MREC as the methodology for the economic pipe diameter determination, due to the impossibility of finding an appropriate value for the Bresse’s equation coefficient.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/report
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format report
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2318-03312019000100402
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2318-03312019000100402
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2318-0331.241920180148
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv RBRH v.24 2019
reponame:RBRH (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)
instacron:ABRH
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)
instacron_str ABRH
institution ABRH
reponame_str RBRH (Online)
collection RBRH (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv RBRH (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbrh@abrh.org.br
_version_ 1754734701932707840