Is the tumor-stroma ratio a prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302022000500664 |
Resumo: | SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the prognostic effect of the tumor-stroma ratio, which has been shown to have prognostic value in various cancers, in patients with gallbladder cancer who have undergone curative resection. METHODS: The records of gallbladder cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment in our clinic between December 2005 and March 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections representing the tumors were evaluated under light microscopy to determine tumor-stroma ratio, and based on the results, <50% was defined as the stroma-rich and ≥50% as the stroma-poor groups. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients, including 20 females and 8 males, with a mean age of 64.6 years, were included in this study. Stroma-poor and stroma-rich tumors were detected in 15 and 13 patients, respectively. There was no statistically significant relationship identified between tumor-stroma ratio and advanced age, gender, serum levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen, incidental or nonincidental diagnosis, jaundice, adjacent organ or structure resection, tumor location, grades 1–2 or 3, T1/T2 or T3/T4, N0 or N1/N2, M stage, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion. The stroma-poor and stroma-rich groups had a 5-year survival rate of 30% and 19.2% and a median overall survival of 25.7 and 15.1 months, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (p=0.526). CONCLUSIONS: A low tumor-stroma ratio tended to be a poor prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer, although not to a statistically significant degree. This can be considered one of the preliminary studies, as further studies involving larger groups are needed. |
id |
AMB-1_08107584d781fa7c440b537be0a3a1e7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0104-42302022000500664 |
network_acronym_str |
AMB-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Is the tumor-stroma ratio a prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer?Gallbladder neoplasmsPrognosisTumor microenvironmentSUMMARY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the prognostic effect of the tumor-stroma ratio, which has been shown to have prognostic value in various cancers, in patients with gallbladder cancer who have undergone curative resection. METHODS: The records of gallbladder cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment in our clinic between December 2005 and March 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections representing the tumors were evaluated under light microscopy to determine tumor-stroma ratio, and based on the results, <50% was defined as the stroma-rich and ≥50% as the stroma-poor groups. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients, including 20 females and 8 males, with a mean age of 64.6 years, were included in this study. Stroma-poor and stroma-rich tumors were detected in 15 and 13 patients, respectively. There was no statistically significant relationship identified between tumor-stroma ratio and advanced age, gender, serum levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen, incidental or nonincidental diagnosis, jaundice, adjacent organ or structure resection, tumor location, grades 1–2 or 3, T1/T2 or T3/T4, N0 or N1/N2, M stage, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion. The stroma-poor and stroma-rich groups had a 5-year survival rate of 30% and 19.2% and a median overall survival of 25.7 and 15.1 months, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (p=0.526). CONCLUSIONS: A low tumor-stroma ratio tended to be a poor prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer, although not to a statistically significant degree. This can be considered one of the preliminary studies, as further studies involving larger groups are needed.Associação Médica Brasileira2022-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302022000500664Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.68 n.5 2022reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)instacron:AMB10.1590/1806-9282.20220037info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUzun,Mehmet AliTilki,MetinGönültaş,AylinAker,FügenKayaoglu,Sevcan AlkanOkuyan,Gülten Çiçekeng2022-09-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-42302022000500664Revistahttps://ramb.amb.org.br/ultimas-edicoes/#https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ramb@amb.org.br1806-92820104-4230opendoar:2022-09-13T00:00Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is the tumor-stroma ratio a prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer? |
title |
Is the tumor-stroma ratio a prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer? |
spellingShingle |
Is the tumor-stroma ratio a prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer? Uzun,Mehmet Ali Gallbladder neoplasms Prognosis Tumor microenvironment |
title_short |
Is the tumor-stroma ratio a prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer? |
title_full |
Is the tumor-stroma ratio a prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer? |
title_fullStr |
Is the tumor-stroma ratio a prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is the tumor-stroma ratio a prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer? |
title_sort |
Is the tumor-stroma ratio a prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer? |
author |
Uzun,Mehmet Ali |
author_facet |
Uzun,Mehmet Ali Tilki,Metin Gönültaş,Aylin Aker,Fügen Kayaoglu,Sevcan Alkan Okuyan,Gülten Çiçek |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Tilki,Metin Gönültaş,Aylin Aker,Fügen Kayaoglu,Sevcan Alkan Okuyan,Gülten Çiçek |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Uzun,Mehmet Ali Tilki,Metin Gönültaş,Aylin Aker,Fügen Kayaoglu,Sevcan Alkan Okuyan,Gülten Çiçek |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Gallbladder neoplasms Prognosis Tumor microenvironment |
topic |
Gallbladder neoplasms Prognosis Tumor microenvironment |
description |
SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the prognostic effect of the tumor-stroma ratio, which has been shown to have prognostic value in various cancers, in patients with gallbladder cancer who have undergone curative resection. METHODS: The records of gallbladder cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment in our clinic between December 2005 and March 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections representing the tumors were evaluated under light microscopy to determine tumor-stroma ratio, and based on the results, <50% was defined as the stroma-rich and ≥50% as the stroma-poor groups. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients, including 20 females and 8 males, with a mean age of 64.6 years, were included in this study. Stroma-poor and stroma-rich tumors were detected in 15 and 13 patients, respectively. There was no statistically significant relationship identified between tumor-stroma ratio and advanced age, gender, serum levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen, incidental or nonincidental diagnosis, jaundice, adjacent organ or structure resection, tumor location, grades 1–2 or 3, T1/T2 or T3/T4, N0 or N1/N2, M stage, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion. The stroma-poor and stroma-rich groups had a 5-year survival rate of 30% and 19.2% and a median overall survival of 25.7 and 15.1 months, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (p=0.526). CONCLUSIONS: A low tumor-stroma ratio tended to be a poor prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer, although not to a statistically significant degree. This can be considered one of the preliminary studies, as further studies involving larger groups are needed. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302022000500664 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302022000500664 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1806-9282.20220037 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Médica Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Médica Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.68 n.5 2022 reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB) instacron:AMB |
instname_str |
Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB) |
instacron_str |
AMB |
institution |
AMB |
reponame_str |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ramb@amb.org.br |
_version_ |
1754212837715083264 |