Critical analysis of the use of statistical tests in Brazilian publications related to digestive tract surgery

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Orso,Ivan Roberto Bonotto
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Pereira,Julio C R, D'Albuquerque,Luiz A C, Cecconello,Ivan, Jukemura,José
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302011000100013
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the evolution of scientific papers published on digestive tract surgery in Brazilian journals in 20 years and examine whether the level of evidence in the studies has improved, as well as the incorporation of statistical procedures and their proper application. METHODS: We selected all original articles related to digestive tract surgery published in the years of 1987 and 2007 in 4 leading Brazilian surgical journals. Studies were divided according to the level of evidence (I: prospective, controlled and randomized, II: prospective without control or randomization and III: retrospective) and compared them to assess whether there was an improvement in the level of evidence between these two years surveyed. We also assessed whether there was increased use of analytical statistics and correct application of statistical procedures. RESULTS: Comparing the articles published in 1987 with those of 2007, we observed no improvement with respect to the level of evidence, with more than half of the articles published being case series and retrospective studies (56.14%). There has been a significant increase in the use of analytical statistics (70.4% in 2007 vs. 40% in 1987) in the 20 years, however 16.7% of the studies published in 2007 did not correctly apply or adequately describe the statistical analyses used. CONCLUSION: In this study, we observed no improvement in the level of evidence presented in publications on digestive tract surgery in the last 20 years. There was an increased use of statistical analysis, but there is a need to correctly apply statistical procedures.
id AMB-1_3fa12bed1a99414da8ecd5f97afe0f5c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0104-42302011000100013
network_acronym_str AMB-1
network_name_str Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Critical analysis of the use of statistical tests in Brazilian publications related to digestive tract surgeryStatistical analysisgastrointestinal tractscientific and technical publicationsstatistical methods and proceduresOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the evolution of scientific papers published on digestive tract surgery in Brazilian journals in 20 years and examine whether the level of evidence in the studies has improved, as well as the incorporation of statistical procedures and their proper application. METHODS: We selected all original articles related to digestive tract surgery published in the years of 1987 and 2007 in 4 leading Brazilian surgical journals. Studies were divided according to the level of evidence (I: prospective, controlled and randomized, II: prospective without control or randomization and III: retrospective) and compared them to assess whether there was an improvement in the level of evidence between these two years surveyed. We also assessed whether there was increased use of analytical statistics and correct application of statistical procedures. RESULTS: Comparing the articles published in 1987 with those of 2007, we observed no improvement with respect to the level of evidence, with more than half of the articles published being case series and retrospective studies (56.14%). There has been a significant increase in the use of analytical statistics (70.4% in 2007 vs. 40% in 1987) in the 20 years, however 16.7% of the studies published in 2007 did not correctly apply or adequately describe the statistical analyses used. CONCLUSION: In this study, we observed no improvement in the level of evidence presented in publications on digestive tract surgery in the last 20 years. There was an increased use of statistical analysis, but there is a need to correctly apply statistical procedures.Associação Médica Brasileira2011-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302011000100013Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.57 n.1 2011reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)instacron:AMB10.1590/S0104-42302011000100013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOrso,Ivan Roberto BonottoPereira,Julio C RD'Albuquerque,Luiz A CCecconello,IvanJukemura,Joséeng2011-02-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-42302011000100013Revistahttps://ramb.amb.org.br/ultimas-edicoes/#https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ramb@amb.org.br1806-92820104-4230opendoar:2011-02-25T00:00Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Critical analysis of the use of statistical tests in Brazilian publications related to digestive tract surgery
title Critical analysis of the use of statistical tests in Brazilian publications related to digestive tract surgery
spellingShingle Critical analysis of the use of statistical tests in Brazilian publications related to digestive tract surgery
Orso,Ivan Roberto Bonotto
Statistical analysis
gastrointestinal tract
scientific and technical publications
statistical methods and procedures
title_short Critical analysis of the use of statistical tests in Brazilian publications related to digestive tract surgery
title_full Critical analysis of the use of statistical tests in Brazilian publications related to digestive tract surgery
title_fullStr Critical analysis of the use of statistical tests in Brazilian publications related to digestive tract surgery
title_full_unstemmed Critical analysis of the use of statistical tests in Brazilian publications related to digestive tract surgery
title_sort Critical analysis of the use of statistical tests in Brazilian publications related to digestive tract surgery
author Orso,Ivan Roberto Bonotto
author_facet Orso,Ivan Roberto Bonotto
Pereira,Julio C R
D'Albuquerque,Luiz A C
Cecconello,Ivan
Jukemura,José
author_role author
author2 Pereira,Julio C R
D'Albuquerque,Luiz A C
Cecconello,Ivan
Jukemura,José
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Orso,Ivan Roberto Bonotto
Pereira,Julio C R
D'Albuquerque,Luiz A C
Cecconello,Ivan
Jukemura,José
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Statistical analysis
gastrointestinal tract
scientific and technical publications
statistical methods and procedures
topic Statistical analysis
gastrointestinal tract
scientific and technical publications
statistical methods and procedures
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the evolution of scientific papers published on digestive tract surgery in Brazilian journals in 20 years and examine whether the level of evidence in the studies has improved, as well as the incorporation of statistical procedures and their proper application. METHODS: We selected all original articles related to digestive tract surgery published in the years of 1987 and 2007 in 4 leading Brazilian surgical journals. Studies were divided according to the level of evidence (I: prospective, controlled and randomized, II: prospective without control or randomization and III: retrospective) and compared them to assess whether there was an improvement in the level of evidence between these two years surveyed. We also assessed whether there was increased use of analytical statistics and correct application of statistical procedures. RESULTS: Comparing the articles published in 1987 with those of 2007, we observed no improvement with respect to the level of evidence, with more than half of the articles published being case series and retrospective studies (56.14%). There has been a significant increase in the use of analytical statistics (70.4% in 2007 vs. 40% in 1987) in the 20 years, however 16.7% of the studies published in 2007 did not correctly apply or adequately describe the statistical analyses used. CONCLUSION: In this study, we observed no improvement in the level of evidence presented in publications on digestive tract surgery in the last 20 years. There was an increased use of statistical analysis, but there is a need to correctly apply statistical procedures.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302011000100013
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302011000100013
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0104-42302011000100013
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Médica Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Médica Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.57 n.1 2011
reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
instacron:AMB
instname_str Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
instacron_str AMB
institution AMB
reponame_str Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
collection Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ramb@amb.org.br
_version_ 1754212829643145216