Critical analysis of the classic indications for myocardial revascularization

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Azevedo,Diogo Freitas Cardoso de
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Lima,Eduardo Gomes, Ribeiro,Matheus de Oliveira Laterza, Linhares Filho,Jaime Paula Pessoa, Serrano Júnior,Carlos Vicente
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302019000300319
Resumo: SUMMARY Treatment of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) relies on improved prognosis and relief of symptoms. National and international guidelines on CAD support the indication of revascularization in patients with limiting symptoms and refractory to optimal medical treatment, as well as in clinical situations where there is a prognostic benefit of interventional treatment. Most of the studies that support the guidelines for indication of revascularization date back to the 1980s and1990s of the last century. Recent studies have revisited the theme and brought a new breath. The present review provides a critical analysis of classic indications for revascularization, reviewing evidence from the studies of the 1970s to the recent controversial ORBITA study.
id AMB-1_76bba482675c1581677a8634518f8274
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0104-42302019000300319
network_acronym_str AMB-1
network_name_str Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Critical analysis of the classic indications for myocardial revascularizationCoronary artery diseaseMyocardial RevascularizationAngina, StableSUMMARY Treatment of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) relies on improved prognosis and relief of symptoms. National and international guidelines on CAD support the indication of revascularization in patients with limiting symptoms and refractory to optimal medical treatment, as well as in clinical situations where there is a prognostic benefit of interventional treatment. Most of the studies that support the guidelines for indication of revascularization date back to the 1980s and1990s of the last century. Recent studies have revisited the theme and brought a new breath. The present review provides a critical analysis of classic indications for revascularization, reviewing evidence from the studies of the 1970s to the recent controversial ORBITA study.Associação Médica Brasileira2019-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302019000300319Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.65 n.3 2019reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)instacron:AMB10.1590/1806-9282.65.3.319info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAzevedo,Diogo Freitas Cardoso deLima,Eduardo GomesRibeiro,Matheus de Oliveira LaterzaLinhares Filho,Jaime Paula PessoaSerrano Júnior,Carlos Vicenteeng2019-04-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-42302019000300319Revistahttps://ramb.amb.org.br/ultimas-edicoes/#https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ramb@amb.org.br1806-92820104-4230opendoar:2019-04-08T00:00Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Critical analysis of the classic indications for myocardial revascularization
title Critical analysis of the classic indications for myocardial revascularization
spellingShingle Critical analysis of the classic indications for myocardial revascularization
Azevedo,Diogo Freitas Cardoso de
Coronary artery disease
Myocardial Revascularization
Angina, Stable
title_short Critical analysis of the classic indications for myocardial revascularization
title_full Critical analysis of the classic indications for myocardial revascularization
title_fullStr Critical analysis of the classic indications for myocardial revascularization
title_full_unstemmed Critical analysis of the classic indications for myocardial revascularization
title_sort Critical analysis of the classic indications for myocardial revascularization
author Azevedo,Diogo Freitas Cardoso de
author_facet Azevedo,Diogo Freitas Cardoso de
Lima,Eduardo Gomes
Ribeiro,Matheus de Oliveira Laterza
Linhares Filho,Jaime Paula Pessoa
Serrano Júnior,Carlos Vicente
author_role author
author2 Lima,Eduardo Gomes
Ribeiro,Matheus de Oliveira Laterza
Linhares Filho,Jaime Paula Pessoa
Serrano Júnior,Carlos Vicente
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Azevedo,Diogo Freitas Cardoso de
Lima,Eduardo Gomes
Ribeiro,Matheus de Oliveira Laterza
Linhares Filho,Jaime Paula Pessoa
Serrano Júnior,Carlos Vicente
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Coronary artery disease
Myocardial Revascularization
Angina, Stable
topic Coronary artery disease
Myocardial Revascularization
Angina, Stable
description SUMMARY Treatment of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) relies on improved prognosis and relief of symptoms. National and international guidelines on CAD support the indication of revascularization in patients with limiting symptoms and refractory to optimal medical treatment, as well as in clinical situations where there is a prognostic benefit of interventional treatment. Most of the studies that support the guidelines for indication of revascularization date back to the 1980s and1990s of the last century. Recent studies have revisited the theme and brought a new breath. The present review provides a critical analysis of classic indications for revascularization, reviewing evidence from the studies of the 1970s to the recent controversial ORBITA study.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302019000300319
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302019000300319
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1806-9282.65.3.319
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Médica Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Médica Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.65 n.3 2019
reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
instacron:AMB
instname_str Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
instacron_str AMB
institution AMB
reponame_str Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
collection Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ramb@amb.org.br
_version_ 1754212833871003648