Critical analysis of the classic indications for myocardial revascularization
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302019000300319 |
Resumo: | SUMMARY Treatment of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) relies on improved prognosis and relief of symptoms. National and international guidelines on CAD support the indication of revascularization in patients with limiting symptoms and refractory to optimal medical treatment, as well as in clinical situations where there is a prognostic benefit of interventional treatment. Most of the studies that support the guidelines for indication of revascularization date back to the 1980s and1990s of the last century. Recent studies have revisited the theme and brought a new breath. The present review provides a critical analysis of classic indications for revascularization, reviewing evidence from the studies of the 1970s to the recent controversial ORBITA study. |
id |
AMB-1_76bba482675c1581677a8634518f8274 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0104-42302019000300319 |
network_acronym_str |
AMB-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Critical analysis of the classic indications for myocardial revascularizationCoronary artery diseaseMyocardial RevascularizationAngina, StableSUMMARY Treatment of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) relies on improved prognosis and relief of symptoms. National and international guidelines on CAD support the indication of revascularization in patients with limiting symptoms and refractory to optimal medical treatment, as well as in clinical situations where there is a prognostic benefit of interventional treatment. Most of the studies that support the guidelines for indication of revascularization date back to the 1980s and1990s of the last century. Recent studies have revisited the theme and brought a new breath. The present review provides a critical analysis of classic indications for revascularization, reviewing evidence from the studies of the 1970s to the recent controversial ORBITA study.Associação Médica Brasileira2019-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302019000300319Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.65 n.3 2019reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)instacron:AMB10.1590/1806-9282.65.3.319info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAzevedo,Diogo Freitas Cardoso deLima,Eduardo GomesRibeiro,Matheus de Oliveira LaterzaLinhares Filho,Jaime Paula PessoaSerrano Júnior,Carlos Vicenteeng2019-04-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-42302019000300319Revistahttps://ramb.amb.org.br/ultimas-edicoes/#https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ramb@amb.org.br1806-92820104-4230opendoar:2019-04-08T00:00Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Critical analysis of the classic indications for myocardial revascularization |
title |
Critical analysis of the classic indications for myocardial revascularization |
spellingShingle |
Critical analysis of the classic indications for myocardial revascularization Azevedo,Diogo Freitas Cardoso de Coronary artery disease Myocardial Revascularization Angina, Stable |
title_short |
Critical analysis of the classic indications for myocardial revascularization |
title_full |
Critical analysis of the classic indications for myocardial revascularization |
title_fullStr |
Critical analysis of the classic indications for myocardial revascularization |
title_full_unstemmed |
Critical analysis of the classic indications for myocardial revascularization |
title_sort |
Critical analysis of the classic indications for myocardial revascularization |
author |
Azevedo,Diogo Freitas Cardoso de |
author_facet |
Azevedo,Diogo Freitas Cardoso de Lima,Eduardo Gomes Ribeiro,Matheus de Oliveira Laterza Linhares Filho,Jaime Paula Pessoa Serrano Júnior,Carlos Vicente |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lima,Eduardo Gomes Ribeiro,Matheus de Oliveira Laterza Linhares Filho,Jaime Paula Pessoa Serrano Júnior,Carlos Vicente |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Azevedo,Diogo Freitas Cardoso de Lima,Eduardo Gomes Ribeiro,Matheus de Oliveira Laterza Linhares Filho,Jaime Paula Pessoa Serrano Júnior,Carlos Vicente |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Coronary artery disease Myocardial Revascularization Angina, Stable |
topic |
Coronary artery disease Myocardial Revascularization Angina, Stable |
description |
SUMMARY Treatment of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) relies on improved prognosis and relief of symptoms. National and international guidelines on CAD support the indication of revascularization in patients with limiting symptoms and refractory to optimal medical treatment, as well as in clinical situations where there is a prognostic benefit of interventional treatment. Most of the studies that support the guidelines for indication of revascularization date back to the 1980s and1990s of the last century. Recent studies have revisited the theme and brought a new breath. The present review provides a critical analysis of classic indications for revascularization, reviewing evidence from the studies of the 1970s to the recent controversial ORBITA study. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302019000300319 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302019000300319 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1806-9282.65.3.319 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Médica Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Médica Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.65 n.3 2019 reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB) instacron:AMB |
instname_str |
Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB) |
instacron_str |
AMB |
institution |
AMB |
reponame_str |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ramb@amb.org.br |
_version_ |
1754212833871003648 |