Risk factors for episiotomy: a case-control study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Braga,Giordana Campos
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Clementino,Suelem Taís Pereira, Luz,Patrícia Ferreira Neves da, Scavuzzi,Adriana, Noronha Neto,Carlos, Amorim,Melania Maria Ramos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302014000500465
Resumo: Objective: obtaining information on the factors associated with episiotomy will be useful in sensitizing professionals to the need to minimize its incidence. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate risk factors for episiotomy in pregnant women who had undergone vaginal delivery at a university maternity hospital in northeastern Brazil. Methods: a case-control study was conducted with pregnant women submitted to episiotomy (cases) and pregnant women not submitted to episiotomy (controls) between March 2009 and July 2010 at the Professor Fernando Figueira Integral Medicine Institute (IMIP) in Recife, Brazil, in a ratio of 1 case to 2 controls. The study variables consisted of: whether episiotomy was performed, demographic, obstetric and fetal characteristics (primiparity, analgesia, instrumental delivery, fetal distress, etc.), external factors (day and time of delivery, professional attending delivery) and factors directly related to delivery. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the adjusted risk of episiotomy. Results: a total of 522 women (173 cases and 349 controls) were included. It was found that deliveries with episiotomy were more likely to have been attended by staff physicians (OR = 1.88; 95%CI: 1.01 - 3.48), to have required forceps (OR = 12.31; 95%CI: 4.9 - 30.1) and to have occurred in primiparas (OR = 4.24; 95%CI: 2.61 - 6.89). The likelihood of a nurse having attended the delivery with episiotomy was significantly lower (OR = 0.29; 95%CI: 0.16 - 0.55). Conclusion: episiotomy was found to be strongly associated with deliveries attended by staff physicians, with primiparity, and with instrumental delivery, and was less common in deliveries attended by nurses.
id AMB-1_950ed758876d99a18962e42f849693a3
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0104-42302014000500465
network_acronym_str AMB-1
network_name_str Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Risk factors for episiotomy: a case-control studyepisiotomynatural childbirthrisk factorsperineum/injuriescase-control studies Objective: obtaining information on the factors associated with episiotomy will be useful in sensitizing professionals to the need to minimize its incidence. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate risk factors for episiotomy in pregnant women who had undergone vaginal delivery at a university maternity hospital in northeastern Brazil. Methods: a case-control study was conducted with pregnant women submitted to episiotomy (cases) and pregnant women not submitted to episiotomy (controls) between March 2009 and July 2010 at the Professor Fernando Figueira Integral Medicine Institute (IMIP) in Recife, Brazil, in a ratio of 1 case to 2 controls. The study variables consisted of: whether episiotomy was performed, demographic, obstetric and fetal characteristics (primiparity, analgesia, instrumental delivery, fetal distress, etc.), external factors (day and time of delivery, professional attending delivery) and factors directly related to delivery. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the adjusted risk of episiotomy. Results: a total of 522 women (173 cases and 349 controls) were included. It was found that deliveries with episiotomy were more likely to have been attended by staff physicians (OR = 1.88; 95%CI: 1.01 - 3.48), to have required forceps (OR = 12.31; 95%CI: 4.9 - 30.1) and to have occurred in primiparas (OR = 4.24; 95%CI: 2.61 - 6.89). The likelihood of a nurse having attended the delivery with episiotomy was significantly lower (OR = 0.29; 95%CI: 0.16 - 0.55). Conclusion: episiotomy was found to be strongly associated with deliveries attended by staff physicians, with primiparity, and with instrumental delivery, and was less common in deliveries attended by nurses. Associação Médica Brasileira2014-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302014000500465Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.60 n.5 2014reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)instacron:AMB10.1590/1806-9282.60.05.015info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBraga,Giordana CamposClementino,Suelem Taís PereiraLuz,Patrícia Ferreira Neves daScavuzzi,AdrianaNoronha Neto,CarlosAmorim,Melania Maria Ramoseng2014-11-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-42302014000500465Revistahttps://ramb.amb.org.br/ultimas-edicoes/#https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ramb@amb.org.br1806-92820104-4230opendoar:2014-11-17T00:00Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Risk factors for episiotomy: a case-control study
title Risk factors for episiotomy: a case-control study
spellingShingle Risk factors for episiotomy: a case-control study
Braga,Giordana Campos
episiotomy
natural childbirth
risk factors
perineum/injuries
case-control studies
title_short Risk factors for episiotomy: a case-control study
title_full Risk factors for episiotomy: a case-control study
title_fullStr Risk factors for episiotomy: a case-control study
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for episiotomy: a case-control study
title_sort Risk factors for episiotomy: a case-control study
author Braga,Giordana Campos
author_facet Braga,Giordana Campos
Clementino,Suelem Taís Pereira
Luz,Patrícia Ferreira Neves da
Scavuzzi,Adriana
Noronha Neto,Carlos
Amorim,Melania Maria Ramos
author_role author
author2 Clementino,Suelem Taís Pereira
Luz,Patrícia Ferreira Neves da
Scavuzzi,Adriana
Noronha Neto,Carlos
Amorim,Melania Maria Ramos
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Braga,Giordana Campos
Clementino,Suelem Taís Pereira
Luz,Patrícia Ferreira Neves da
Scavuzzi,Adriana
Noronha Neto,Carlos
Amorim,Melania Maria Ramos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv episiotomy
natural childbirth
risk factors
perineum/injuries
case-control studies
topic episiotomy
natural childbirth
risk factors
perineum/injuries
case-control studies
description Objective: obtaining information on the factors associated with episiotomy will be useful in sensitizing professionals to the need to minimize its incidence. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate risk factors for episiotomy in pregnant women who had undergone vaginal delivery at a university maternity hospital in northeastern Brazil. Methods: a case-control study was conducted with pregnant women submitted to episiotomy (cases) and pregnant women not submitted to episiotomy (controls) between March 2009 and July 2010 at the Professor Fernando Figueira Integral Medicine Institute (IMIP) in Recife, Brazil, in a ratio of 1 case to 2 controls. The study variables consisted of: whether episiotomy was performed, demographic, obstetric and fetal characteristics (primiparity, analgesia, instrumental delivery, fetal distress, etc.), external factors (day and time of delivery, professional attending delivery) and factors directly related to delivery. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the adjusted risk of episiotomy. Results: a total of 522 women (173 cases and 349 controls) were included. It was found that deliveries with episiotomy were more likely to have been attended by staff physicians (OR = 1.88; 95%CI: 1.01 - 3.48), to have required forceps (OR = 12.31; 95%CI: 4.9 - 30.1) and to have occurred in primiparas (OR = 4.24; 95%CI: 2.61 - 6.89). The likelihood of a nurse having attended the delivery with episiotomy was significantly lower (OR = 0.29; 95%CI: 0.16 - 0.55). Conclusion: episiotomy was found to be strongly associated with deliveries attended by staff physicians, with primiparity, and with instrumental delivery, and was less common in deliveries attended by nurses.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302014000500465
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302014000500465
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1806-9282.60.05.015
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Médica Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Médica Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.60 n.5 2014
reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
instacron:AMB
instname_str Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
instacron_str AMB
institution AMB
reponame_str Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
collection Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ramb@amb.org.br
_version_ 1754212831186649088