Ethical dilemmas in COVID-19 times: how to decide who lives and who dies?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Neves,Nedy M. B. C.
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Bitencourt,Flávia B. C. S. N., Bitencourt,Almir G. V.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302020001400106
Resumo: SUMMARY The respiratory disease caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is a pandemic that produces a large number of simultaneous patients with severe symptoms and in need of special hospital care, overloading the infrastructure of health services. All of these demands generate the need to ration equipment and interventions. Faced with this imbalance, how, when, and who decides, there is the impact of the stressful systems of professionals who are at the front line of care and, in the background, issues inherent to human subjectivity. Along this path, the idea of using artificial intelligence algorithms to replace health professionals in the decision-making process also arises. In this context, there is the ethical question of how to manage the demands produced by the pandemic. The objective of this work is to reflect, from the point of view of medical ethics, on the basic principles of the choices made by the health teams, during the COVID-19 pandemic, whose resources are scarce and decisions cause anguish and restlessness. The ethical values for the rationing of health resources in an epidemic must converge to some proposals based on fundamental values such as maximizing the benefits produced by scarce resources, treating people equally, promoting and recommending instrumental values, giving priority to critical situations. Naturally, different judgments will occur in different circumstances, but transparency is essential to ensure public trust. In this way, it is possible to develop prioritization guidelines using well-defined values and ethical recommendations to achieve fair resource allocation.
id AMB-1_a50805985c8211a5d43c3d8e061a0d73
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0104-42302020001400106
network_acronym_str AMB-1
network_name_str Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Ethical dilemmas in COVID-19 times: how to decide who lives and who dies?Ethics, MedicalBioethicsPandemicsCoronavirus InfectionsDecision MakingResource AllocationSUMMARY The respiratory disease caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is a pandemic that produces a large number of simultaneous patients with severe symptoms and in need of special hospital care, overloading the infrastructure of health services. All of these demands generate the need to ration equipment and interventions. Faced with this imbalance, how, when, and who decides, there is the impact of the stressful systems of professionals who are at the front line of care and, in the background, issues inherent to human subjectivity. Along this path, the idea of using artificial intelligence algorithms to replace health professionals in the decision-making process also arises. In this context, there is the ethical question of how to manage the demands produced by the pandemic. The objective of this work is to reflect, from the point of view of medical ethics, on the basic principles of the choices made by the health teams, during the COVID-19 pandemic, whose resources are scarce and decisions cause anguish and restlessness. The ethical values for the rationing of health resources in an epidemic must converge to some proposals based on fundamental values such as maximizing the benefits produced by scarce resources, treating people equally, promoting and recommending instrumental values, giving priority to critical situations. Naturally, different judgments will occur in different circumstances, but transparency is essential to ensure public trust. In this way, it is possible to develop prioritization guidelines using well-defined values and ethical recommendations to achieve fair resource allocation.Associação Médica Brasileira2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302020001400106Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.66 suppl.2 2020reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)instacron:AMB10.1590/1806-9282.66.s2.106info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNeves,Nedy M. B. C.Bitencourt,Flávia B. C. S. N.Bitencourt,Almir G. V.eng2020-11-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-42302020001400106Revistahttps://ramb.amb.org.br/ultimas-edicoes/#https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ramb@amb.org.br1806-92820104-4230opendoar:2020-11-04T00:00Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ethical dilemmas in COVID-19 times: how to decide who lives and who dies?
title Ethical dilemmas in COVID-19 times: how to decide who lives and who dies?
spellingShingle Ethical dilemmas in COVID-19 times: how to decide who lives and who dies?
Neves,Nedy M. B. C.
Ethics, Medical
Bioethics
Pandemics
Coronavirus Infections
Decision Making
Resource Allocation
title_short Ethical dilemmas in COVID-19 times: how to decide who lives and who dies?
title_full Ethical dilemmas in COVID-19 times: how to decide who lives and who dies?
title_fullStr Ethical dilemmas in COVID-19 times: how to decide who lives and who dies?
title_full_unstemmed Ethical dilemmas in COVID-19 times: how to decide who lives and who dies?
title_sort Ethical dilemmas in COVID-19 times: how to decide who lives and who dies?
author Neves,Nedy M. B. C.
author_facet Neves,Nedy M. B. C.
Bitencourt,Flávia B. C. S. N.
Bitencourt,Almir G. V.
author_role author
author2 Bitencourt,Flávia B. C. S. N.
Bitencourt,Almir G. V.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Neves,Nedy M. B. C.
Bitencourt,Flávia B. C. S. N.
Bitencourt,Almir G. V.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ethics, Medical
Bioethics
Pandemics
Coronavirus Infections
Decision Making
Resource Allocation
topic Ethics, Medical
Bioethics
Pandemics
Coronavirus Infections
Decision Making
Resource Allocation
description SUMMARY The respiratory disease caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is a pandemic that produces a large number of simultaneous patients with severe symptoms and in need of special hospital care, overloading the infrastructure of health services. All of these demands generate the need to ration equipment and interventions. Faced with this imbalance, how, when, and who decides, there is the impact of the stressful systems of professionals who are at the front line of care and, in the background, issues inherent to human subjectivity. Along this path, the idea of using artificial intelligence algorithms to replace health professionals in the decision-making process also arises. In this context, there is the ethical question of how to manage the demands produced by the pandemic. The objective of this work is to reflect, from the point of view of medical ethics, on the basic principles of the choices made by the health teams, during the COVID-19 pandemic, whose resources are scarce and decisions cause anguish and restlessness. The ethical values for the rationing of health resources in an epidemic must converge to some proposals based on fundamental values such as maximizing the benefits produced by scarce resources, treating people equally, promoting and recommending instrumental values, giving priority to critical situations. Naturally, different judgments will occur in different circumstances, but transparency is essential to ensure public trust. In this way, it is possible to develop prioritization guidelines using well-defined values and ethical recommendations to achieve fair resource allocation.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302020001400106
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302020001400106
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1806-9282.66.s2.106
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Médica Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Médica Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.66 suppl.2 2020
reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
instacron:AMB
instname_str Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
instacron_str AMB
institution AMB
reponame_str Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
collection Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ramb@amb.org.br
_version_ 1754212835661971456