Physiotherapy services in the face of a pandemic

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Minghelli,Beatriz
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Soares,Ana, Guerreiro,Andreia, Ribeiro,Antoine, Cabrita,Carolina, Vitoria,Carlos, Nunes,Chloé, Martins,Claudia, Gomes,Diogo, Goulart,Filipa, Santos,Raquel Marreiro dos, Antunes,Rita
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302020000400491
Resumo: SUMMARY BACKGROUND Physiotherapy services are necessary for hospitalized patients of COVID-19 as well as chronic patients. Thus, physiotherapists present an increased risk of exposure to coronavirus. This study aimed to determine the number of physiotherapists who interrupted their services because of the COVID-19 pandemic and to verify the procedures adopted by the ones who are still working. METHODS The sample comprised 619 physiotherapists who worked in Portugal, 154 (24.9%) male and 465 (75.1%) female, aged between 22 and 67 years (34.47±8.70). The measurement instrument was an on-line questionnaire applied in late March 2020 through contacts and social networks. RESULTS 453 (73.2%) physiotherapists interrupted their work activities in person because of the pandemic and 166 (26.8%) continue to work in person. The main measures adopted by physical therapists who continue to work in person included: hand washing (21.5%), mask use (20.3%), material disinfection (19.3%) and, glove use (19.3%). Of the physiotherapists who are not working in person (n = 453), 267 (58.9%) continue to monitor their patients at a distance, and 186 (41.1%) are not monitoring the patients. The main measures used by physiotherapists to monitor their patients at a distance included: written treatment prescription (38%), making explanatory videos (26.7%), and synchronous video conference treatment (23.5%). CONCLUSIONS Our data revealed that most of the physiotherapists interrupted their face-to-face practices because of the COVID-19 pandemic, however, once they do not follow up their patients’ treatment in person, most of them adapted to monitor their patients from a distance.
id AMB-1_b178cd4e6b15d84e8bd6f387a3c67def
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0104-42302020000400491
network_acronym_str AMB-1
network_name_str Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Physiotherapy services in the face of a pandemicCOVID-19physical therapistsadopted measurespandemichealth professionalsSUMMARY BACKGROUND Physiotherapy services are necessary for hospitalized patients of COVID-19 as well as chronic patients. Thus, physiotherapists present an increased risk of exposure to coronavirus. This study aimed to determine the number of physiotherapists who interrupted their services because of the COVID-19 pandemic and to verify the procedures adopted by the ones who are still working. METHODS The sample comprised 619 physiotherapists who worked in Portugal, 154 (24.9%) male and 465 (75.1%) female, aged between 22 and 67 years (34.47±8.70). The measurement instrument was an on-line questionnaire applied in late March 2020 through contacts and social networks. RESULTS 453 (73.2%) physiotherapists interrupted their work activities in person because of the pandemic and 166 (26.8%) continue to work in person. The main measures adopted by physical therapists who continue to work in person included: hand washing (21.5%), mask use (20.3%), material disinfection (19.3%) and, glove use (19.3%). Of the physiotherapists who are not working in person (n = 453), 267 (58.9%) continue to monitor their patients at a distance, and 186 (41.1%) are not monitoring the patients. The main measures used by physiotherapists to monitor their patients at a distance included: written treatment prescription (38%), making explanatory videos (26.7%), and synchronous video conference treatment (23.5%). CONCLUSIONS Our data revealed that most of the physiotherapists interrupted their face-to-face practices because of the COVID-19 pandemic, however, once they do not follow up their patients’ treatment in person, most of them adapted to monitor their patients from a distance.Associação Médica Brasileira2020-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302020000400491Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.66 n.4 2020reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)instacron:AMB10.1590/1806-9282.66.4.491info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMinghelli,BeatrizSoares,AnaGuerreiro,AndreiaRibeiro,AntoineCabrita,CarolinaVitoria,CarlosNunes,ChloéMartins,ClaudiaGomes,DiogoGoulart,FilipaSantos,Raquel Marreiro dosAntunes,Ritaeng2020-06-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-42302020000400491Revistahttps://ramb.amb.org.br/ultimas-edicoes/#https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ramb@amb.org.br1806-92820104-4230opendoar:2020-06-10T00:00Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Physiotherapy services in the face of a pandemic
title Physiotherapy services in the face of a pandemic
spellingShingle Physiotherapy services in the face of a pandemic
Minghelli,Beatriz
COVID-19
physical therapists
adopted measures
pandemic
health professionals
title_short Physiotherapy services in the face of a pandemic
title_full Physiotherapy services in the face of a pandemic
title_fullStr Physiotherapy services in the face of a pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Physiotherapy services in the face of a pandemic
title_sort Physiotherapy services in the face of a pandemic
author Minghelli,Beatriz
author_facet Minghelli,Beatriz
Soares,Ana
Guerreiro,Andreia
Ribeiro,Antoine
Cabrita,Carolina
Vitoria,Carlos
Nunes,Chloé
Martins,Claudia
Gomes,Diogo
Goulart,Filipa
Santos,Raquel Marreiro dos
Antunes,Rita
author_role author
author2 Soares,Ana
Guerreiro,Andreia
Ribeiro,Antoine
Cabrita,Carolina
Vitoria,Carlos
Nunes,Chloé
Martins,Claudia
Gomes,Diogo
Goulart,Filipa
Santos,Raquel Marreiro dos
Antunes,Rita
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Minghelli,Beatriz
Soares,Ana
Guerreiro,Andreia
Ribeiro,Antoine
Cabrita,Carolina
Vitoria,Carlos
Nunes,Chloé
Martins,Claudia
Gomes,Diogo
Goulart,Filipa
Santos,Raquel Marreiro dos
Antunes,Rita
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv COVID-19
physical therapists
adopted measures
pandemic
health professionals
topic COVID-19
physical therapists
adopted measures
pandemic
health professionals
description SUMMARY BACKGROUND Physiotherapy services are necessary for hospitalized patients of COVID-19 as well as chronic patients. Thus, physiotherapists present an increased risk of exposure to coronavirus. This study aimed to determine the number of physiotherapists who interrupted their services because of the COVID-19 pandemic and to verify the procedures adopted by the ones who are still working. METHODS The sample comprised 619 physiotherapists who worked in Portugal, 154 (24.9%) male and 465 (75.1%) female, aged between 22 and 67 years (34.47±8.70). The measurement instrument was an on-line questionnaire applied in late March 2020 through contacts and social networks. RESULTS 453 (73.2%) physiotherapists interrupted their work activities in person because of the pandemic and 166 (26.8%) continue to work in person. The main measures adopted by physical therapists who continue to work in person included: hand washing (21.5%), mask use (20.3%), material disinfection (19.3%) and, glove use (19.3%). Of the physiotherapists who are not working in person (n = 453), 267 (58.9%) continue to monitor their patients at a distance, and 186 (41.1%) are not monitoring the patients. The main measures used by physiotherapists to monitor their patients at a distance included: written treatment prescription (38%), making explanatory videos (26.7%), and synchronous video conference treatment (23.5%). CONCLUSIONS Our data revealed that most of the physiotherapists interrupted their face-to-face practices because of the COVID-19 pandemic, however, once they do not follow up their patients’ treatment in person, most of them adapted to monitor their patients from a distance.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302020000400491
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302020000400491
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1806-9282.66.4.491
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Médica Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Médica Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.66 n.4 2020
reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
instacron:AMB
instname_str Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
instacron_str AMB
institution AMB
reponame_str Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
collection Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ramb@amb.org.br
_version_ 1754212834816819200