Evaluation of the Global Entrepreneurship Index validity
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas - REGEPE |
Texto Completo: | https://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2050 |
Resumo: | Purpose: our objective is to assess whether the Global Entrepreneurship Index (GEI) is a valid methodology for measuring the national systems of entrepreneurship. Theoretical framework: we use the structural equation modeling (SEM) as a theoretical lens to evaluate the Global Entrepreneurship Index. Design/methodology/approach: to achieve the research objective, we perform structural equation modeling to measure the formative model of GEI, using the SmartPLS 3.0 software, in order to verify the convergent validity of the constructs; the collinearity of indicators and their relevance for measuring entrepreneurship. Findings: the results obtained show that the sub-indices and indicators are adequate to measure entrepreneurship. However, we identified that there is a need to replace the micro-level components of the opportunity perception and networking indicators which provide distorted results of what is understood as productive or high impact entrepreneurship. Research, practical and social implications: the main contributions of our study are directed to the indicators’ developers. We suggest the use of components that capture aspects associated with high-impact or technology-based entrepreneurship instead of any attempt to create a new business, as our results indicate that generic components provide short-sighted results on the state of entrepreneurship, hampering comparative studies at the country-level. Originality/value: although the GEI is based on the OECD recommendations for the construction of composite indicators (indices), we have not identified any studies (not even performed by the GEI developers) on the validity of the index as a methodology for measuring entrepreneurship. |
id |
ANEGEPE_9c0cc98d69f2dd1ac475375da853e9b9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.regepe.org.br:article/2050 |
network_acronym_str |
ANEGEPE |
network_name_str |
REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of the Global Entrepreneurship Index validityEvaluación de la validez del Global Entrepreneurship IndexAvaliação da validade do Global Entrepreneurship IndexSistema Nacional de Empreendedorismo. Ecossistema de Empreendedorismo. Índice compostoNational Systems of EntrepreneurshipEntrepreneurial EcosystemsComposite IndexSistema Nacional de EmprendimientoEcosistema de EmprendimientoÍndice compuestoPurpose: our objective is to assess whether the Global Entrepreneurship Index (GEI) is a valid methodology for measuring the national systems of entrepreneurship. Theoretical framework: we use the structural equation modeling (SEM) as a theoretical lens to evaluate the Global Entrepreneurship Index. Design/methodology/approach: to achieve the research objective, we perform structural equation modeling to measure the formative model of GEI, using the SmartPLS 3.0 software, in order to verify the convergent validity of the constructs; the collinearity of indicators and their relevance for measuring entrepreneurship. Findings: the results obtained show that the sub-indices and indicators are adequate to measure entrepreneurship. However, we identified that there is a need to replace the micro-level components of the opportunity perception and networking indicators which provide distorted results of what is understood as productive or high impact entrepreneurship. Research, practical and social implications: the main contributions of our study are directed to the indicators’ developers. We suggest the use of components that capture aspects associated with high-impact or technology-based entrepreneurship instead of any attempt to create a new business, as our results indicate that generic components provide short-sighted results on the state of entrepreneurship, hampering comparative studies at the country-level. Originality/value: although the GEI is based on the OECD recommendations for the construction of composite indicators (indices), we have not identified any studies (not even performed by the GEI developers) on the validity of the index as a methodology for measuring entrepreneurship.Objetivo: nuestro objetivo es evaluar si el Global Entrepreneurship Index es un método válido para medir los sistemas nacionales de emprendimiento. Método: para lograr el objetivo, realizamos un modelado de ecuaciones estructurales para medir el modelo formativo del Global Entrepreneurship Index (GEI), utilizando el software SmartPLS 3.0, con el fin de verificar si los indicadores del GEI son convergentes para los constructos; la colinealidad de los indicadores y su relevancia para medir el espíritu empresarial a nivel de país. Originalidad/Relevancia: si bien el GEI se basa em las recomendaciones de la OCDE para la construcción de indicadores compuestos (índices), no hemos identificado ningún estudio (ni siquiera realizado por los desarrolladores del GEI) sobre la validez del índice como instrumento de medición del emprendimiento. Resultados: los resultados obtenidos muestran que los subíndices e indicadores son adecuados para medir el emprendimiento. Sin embargo, identificamos que existe la necesidad de reemplazar los componentes a nivel micro de los indicadores “opportunity perception” y “networking” que brindan resultados distorsionados de lo que se entiende como emprendimiento productivo o de alto impacto. Contribuciones teóricas/metodológicas: las principales contribuciones de nuestro estúdio están dirigidas a los desarrolladores de indicadores. Sugerimos el uso de componentes que capturen aspectos asociados con el emprendimiento de alto impacto o de base tecnológica en lugar de cualquier intento de crear un nuevo negocio, ya que nuestros resultados indican que los componentes genéricos brindan resultados miopes sobre el estado del emprendimiento, dificultando los estudios comparativos a nivel del país.Objetivo: avaliar se o Global Entrepreneurship Index (GEI) é uma metodologia válida para mensurar os sistemas nacionais de empreendedorismo. Método: modelagem de equações estruturais, com a utilização do software SmartPLS 3.0, a fim de mensurar o modelo formativo do GEI, e verificar a validade convergente dos construtos, a colinearidade dos indicadores e sua relevância para o empreendedorismo. Originalidade/Relevância: ainda que o GEI se baseie nas recomendações da OCDE para a construção de indicadores compostos (índices), nenhum estudo (nem mesmo elaborado pelos desenvolvedores do GEI) foi encontrado sobre a validade do índice como metodologia de mensuração do empreendedorismo. Resultados: os subíndices e os indicadores analisados se mostraram adequados para mensurar o empreendedorismo, embora haja a necessidade de substituir os componentes de nível micro dos indicadores “opportunity perception” e “networking”, tendo em vista os resultados distorcidos apresentados do que se entende como empreendedorismo produtivo. Contribuições teóricas/metodológicas: as principais contribuições deste estudo estão direcionadas aos desenvolvedores de indicadores, pois é sugerido o uso de componentes capazes de capturar aspectos associados ao empreendedorismo de alto impacto e de base tecnológica, em vez da criação de um novo negócio. Isso se dá porque componentes genéricos fornecem resultados míopes sobre o estado do empreendedorismo, prejudicando, assim, estudos comparativos em nível de país.ANEGEPE - Associação Nacional de Estudos em Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas2022-09-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/205010.14211/ibjesb.e2050REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022): May/Aug.; e2050REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal; Vol. 11 Núm. 2 (2022): mayo/ago.; e2050REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal; v. 11 n. 2 (2022): maio/ago.; e20502965-1506reponame:Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas - REGEPEinstname:Associação Nacional de Estudos em Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas (ANEGEPE)instacron:ANEGEPEporenghttps://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2050/523https://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2050/524Copyright (c) 2022 Eduardo Avancci Dionisio, Dirceu Silva, Ruy Quadros Carvalho, Edmundo Inácio Júniorhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAvancci Dionisio, EduardoSilva, DirceuQuadros Carvalho, RuyInácio Júnior, Edmundo2023-03-25T14:39:04Zoai:ojs.regepe.org.br:article/2050Revistahttps://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/indexPRIhttps://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/oaieditorialregep@gmail.com2316-20582316-2058opendoar:2023-03-25T14:39:04Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas - REGEPE - Associação Nacional de Estudos em Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas (ANEGEPE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of the Global Entrepreneurship Index validity Evaluación de la validez del Global Entrepreneurship Index Avaliação da validade do Global Entrepreneurship Index |
title |
Evaluation of the Global Entrepreneurship Index validity |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of the Global Entrepreneurship Index validity Avancci Dionisio, Eduardo Sistema Nacional de Empreendedorismo. Ecossistema de Empreendedorismo. Índice composto National Systems of Entrepreneurship Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Composite Index Sistema Nacional de Emprendimiento Ecosistema de Emprendimiento Índice compuesto |
title_short |
Evaluation of the Global Entrepreneurship Index validity |
title_full |
Evaluation of the Global Entrepreneurship Index validity |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of the Global Entrepreneurship Index validity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the Global Entrepreneurship Index validity |
title_sort |
Evaluation of the Global Entrepreneurship Index validity |
author |
Avancci Dionisio, Eduardo |
author_facet |
Avancci Dionisio, Eduardo Silva, Dirceu Quadros Carvalho, Ruy Inácio Júnior, Edmundo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Dirceu Quadros Carvalho, Ruy Inácio Júnior, Edmundo |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Avancci Dionisio, Eduardo Silva, Dirceu Quadros Carvalho, Ruy Inácio Júnior, Edmundo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sistema Nacional de Empreendedorismo. Ecossistema de Empreendedorismo. Índice composto National Systems of Entrepreneurship Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Composite Index Sistema Nacional de Emprendimiento Ecosistema de Emprendimiento Índice compuesto |
topic |
Sistema Nacional de Empreendedorismo. Ecossistema de Empreendedorismo. Índice composto National Systems of Entrepreneurship Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Composite Index Sistema Nacional de Emprendimiento Ecosistema de Emprendimiento Índice compuesto |
description |
Purpose: our objective is to assess whether the Global Entrepreneurship Index (GEI) is a valid methodology for measuring the national systems of entrepreneurship. Theoretical framework: we use the structural equation modeling (SEM) as a theoretical lens to evaluate the Global Entrepreneurship Index. Design/methodology/approach: to achieve the research objective, we perform structural equation modeling to measure the formative model of GEI, using the SmartPLS 3.0 software, in order to verify the convergent validity of the constructs; the collinearity of indicators and their relevance for measuring entrepreneurship. Findings: the results obtained show that the sub-indices and indicators are adequate to measure entrepreneurship. However, we identified that there is a need to replace the micro-level components of the opportunity perception and networking indicators which provide distorted results of what is understood as productive or high impact entrepreneurship. Research, practical and social implications: the main contributions of our study are directed to the indicators’ developers. We suggest the use of components that capture aspects associated with high-impact or technology-based entrepreneurship instead of any attempt to create a new business, as our results indicate that generic components provide short-sighted results on the state of entrepreneurship, hampering comparative studies at the country-level. Originality/value: although the GEI is based on the OECD recommendations for the construction of composite indicators (indices), we have not identified any studies (not even performed by the GEI developers) on the validity of the index as a methodology for measuring entrepreneurship. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-09-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2050 10.14211/ibjesb.e2050 |
url |
https://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2050 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14211/ibjesb.e2050 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2050/523 https://www.regepe.org.br/regepe/article/view/2050/524 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANEGEPE - Associação Nacional de Estudos em Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANEGEPE - Associação Nacional de Estudos em Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022): May/Aug.; e2050 REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal; Vol. 11 Núm. 2 (2022): mayo/ago.; e2050 REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal; v. 11 n. 2 (2022): maio/ago.; e2050 2965-1506 reponame:Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas - REGEPE instname:Associação Nacional de Estudos em Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas (ANEGEPE) instacron:ANEGEPE |
instname_str |
Associação Nacional de Estudos em Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas (ANEGEPE) |
instacron_str |
ANEGEPE |
institution |
ANEGEPE |
reponame_str |
Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas - REGEPE |
collection |
Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas - REGEPE |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas - REGEPE - Associação Nacional de Estudos em Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas (ANEGEPE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
editorialregep@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803580218643841024 |