THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: THOUGHTS FROM THE PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS PERSPECTIVE
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Administração (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/382 |
Resumo: | Although the evaluation of scientific papers is at the heart of all science, it is a process subject to inaccuracies. The objective of this work is to contribute to the improvement of this task through the theoretical framework of Philosophical Hermeneutics. The research examined two management journals, one Brazilian and the other Colombian, while the objects of the analysis were: (i) the paper assessment forms used by the journals, and (ii) the reviewers’ opinions on a sample of papers. The data collection technique used was documentary research and content analysis was employed as the methodological procedure. The findings revealed two journals with different assessment concepts and policies, of which we highlight (i) that a reviewer’s greatest contribution lies in his or her suggested recommendations, (ii) that there is no possibility of convergence among reviewers for any specific paper, (iii) the identification of a paper’s importance depends on the reviewer’s education, in a broad sense, and (iv) that reviewer training programs only ensure convergence with regard to a paper’s formal assessment. The conclusion reached is that adopting the Hermeneutics approach, as employed in this study, may lead to increased competence in reviewers. |
id |
ANGRAD-1_a154aaa1a4b702b4782d131d51a72a46 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.raep.emnuvens.com.br:article/382 |
network_acronym_str |
ANGRAD-1 |
network_name_str |
Administração (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: THOUGHTS FROM THE PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS PERSPECTIVEA REVISÃO DE ARTIGOS CIENTÍFICOS NA ÁREA DE ADMINISTRAÇÃO: CONSIDERAÇÕES COM BASE NA HERMENÊUTICA FILOSÓFICApeer reviewPhilosophical HermeneuticsGadamerHermeneutics approachRevisão por ParesHermenêutica FilosóficaGadamerPostura HermenêuticaAlthough the evaluation of scientific papers is at the heart of all science, it is a process subject to inaccuracies. The objective of this work is to contribute to the improvement of this task through the theoretical framework of Philosophical Hermeneutics. The research examined two management journals, one Brazilian and the other Colombian, while the objects of the analysis were: (i) the paper assessment forms used by the journals, and (ii) the reviewers’ opinions on a sample of papers. The data collection technique used was documentary research and content analysis was employed as the methodological procedure. The findings revealed two journals with different assessment concepts and policies, of which we highlight (i) that a reviewer’s greatest contribution lies in his or her suggested recommendations, (ii) that there is no possibility of convergence among reviewers for any specific paper, (iii) the identification of a paper’s importance depends on the reviewer’s education, in a broad sense, and (iv) that reviewer training programs only ensure convergence with regard to a paper’s formal assessment. The conclusion reached is that adopting the Hermeneutics approach, as employed in this study, may lead to increased competence in reviewers.A avaliação de artigos científicos, embora esteja no coração de toda a ciência, é um processo que está sujeito a imprecisões. O objetivo deste trabalho é contribuir para o aprimoramento dessa tarefa, por meio do referencial teórico da Hermenêutica Filosófica. A pesquisa analisou duas revistas da área de Administração, uma brasileira e outra colombiana, tendo como objetos de análise (i) os formulários de avaliação de artigos das revistas e (ii) pareceres de avaliadores acerca de uma amostra de artigos. A técnica de coleta de dados utilizada foi a pesquisa documental e como procedimento metodológico, a Análise de Conteúdo. Os resultados da pesquisa revelaram duas revistas com concepções e políticas de avaliação distintas. Dentre as conclusões, destacam-se (i) que a maior contribuição do revisor se dá no âmbito das recomendações que ele faz ao artigo, (ii) que não há possibilidade de convergência entre revisores de um mesmo artigo, (iii) que a identificação da relevância do artigo depende da formação em sentido amplo do revisor, e (iv) que programas de treinamento de revisores garantem apenas convergência no que diz respeito à avaliação formal do artigo. Acredita-se que com a adoção de uma Postura Hermenêutica, procedimento identificado e assumido durante a pesquisa, a tarefa do avaliador pode ganhar em competência.Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)2015-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/38210.13058/raep.2015.v16n4.382Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa; Vol. 16 No. 4 (2015): Outubro-Dezembro; 695-722Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa; v. 16 n. 4 (2015): Outubro-Dezembro; 695-7222358-09172177-6083reponame:Administração (São Paulo. Online)instname:Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)instacron:ANGRADporhttps://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/382/193Dantas, Douglas CabralPatrus, Robertoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-10-29T14:43:33Zoai:ojs.raep.emnuvens.com.br:article/382Revistahttp://angrad.org.br/revistaPRIhttps://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/oaiangrad@angrad.org.br||raep@angrad.org.br2358-09172177-6083opendoar:2020-10-29T14:43:33Administração (São Paulo. Online) - Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: THOUGHTS FROM THE PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS PERSPECTIVE A REVISÃO DE ARTIGOS CIENTÍFICOS NA ÁREA DE ADMINISTRAÇÃO: CONSIDERAÇÕES COM BASE NA HERMENÊUTICA FILOSÓFICA |
title |
THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: THOUGHTS FROM THE PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS PERSPECTIVE |
spellingShingle |
THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: THOUGHTS FROM THE PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS PERSPECTIVE Dantas, Douglas Cabral peer review Philosophical Hermeneutics Gadamer Hermeneutics approach Revisão por Pares Hermenêutica Filosófica Gadamer Postura Hermenêutica |
title_short |
THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: THOUGHTS FROM THE PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS PERSPECTIVE |
title_full |
THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: THOUGHTS FROM THE PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS PERSPECTIVE |
title_fullStr |
THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: THOUGHTS FROM THE PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS PERSPECTIVE |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: THOUGHTS FROM THE PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS PERSPECTIVE |
title_sort |
THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: THOUGHTS FROM THE PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS PERSPECTIVE |
author |
Dantas, Douglas Cabral |
author_facet |
Dantas, Douglas Cabral Patrus, Roberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Patrus, Roberto |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dantas, Douglas Cabral Patrus, Roberto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
peer review Philosophical Hermeneutics Gadamer Hermeneutics approach Revisão por Pares Hermenêutica Filosófica Gadamer Postura Hermenêutica |
topic |
peer review Philosophical Hermeneutics Gadamer Hermeneutics approach Revisão por Pares Hermenêutica Filosófica Gadamer Postura Hermenêutica |
description |
Although the evaluation of scientific papers is at the heart of all science, it is a process subject to inaccuracies. The objective of this work is to contribute to the improvement of this task through the theoretical framework of Philosophical Hermeneutics. The research examined two management journals, one Brazilian and the other Colombian, while the objects of the analysis were: (i) the paper assessment forms used by the journals, and (ii) the reviewers’ opinions on a sample of papers. The data collection technique used was documentary research and content analysis was employed as the methodological procedure. The findings revealed two journals with different assessment concepts and policies, of which we highlight (i) that a reviewer’s greatest contribution lies in his or her suggested recommendations, (ii) that there is no possibility of convergence among reviewers for any specific paper, (iii) the identification of a paper’s importance depends on the reviewer’s education, in a broad sense, and (iv) that reviewer training programs only ensure convergence with regard to a paper’s formal assessment. The conclusion reached is that adopting the Hermeneutics approach, as employed in this study, may lead to increased competence in reviewers. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/382 10.13058/raep.2015.v16n4.382 |
url |
https://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/382 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.13058/raep.2015.v16n4.382 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/382/193 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa; Vol. 16 No. 4 (2015): Outubro-Dezembro; 695-722 Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa; v. 16 n. 4 (2015): Outubro-Dezembro; 695-722 2358-0917 2177-6083 reponame:Administração (São Paulo. Online) instname:Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD) instacron:ANGRAD |
instname_str |
Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD) |
instacron_str |
ANGRAD |
institution |
ANGRAD |
reponame_str |
Administração (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Administração (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Administração (São Paulo. Online) - Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
angrad@angrad.org.br||raep@angrad.org.br |
_version_ |
1754212518856753152 |