THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: THOUGHTS FROM THE PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS PERSPECTIVE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dantas, Douglas Cabral
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Patrus, Roberto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Administração (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/382
Resumo: Although the evaluation of scientific papers is at the heart of all science, it is a process subject to inaccuracies. The objective of this work is to contribute to the improvement of this task through the theoretical framework of Philosophical Hermeneutics. The research examined two management journals, one Brazilian and the other Colombian, while the objects of the analysis were: (i) the paper assessment forms used by the journals, and (ii) the reviewers’ opinions on a sample of papers. The data collection technique used was documentary research and content analysis was employed as the methodological procedure. The findings revealed two journals with different assessment concepts and policies, of which we highlight (i) that a reviewer’s greatest contribution lies in his or her suggested recommendations, (ii) that there is no possibility of convergence among reviewers for any specific paper, (iii) the identification of a paper’s importance depends on the reviewer’s education, in a broad sense, and (iv) that reviewer training programs only ensure convergence with regard to a paper’s formal assessment. The conclusion reached is that adopting the Hermeneutics approach, as employed in this study, may lead to increased competence in reviewers.
id ANGRAD-1_a154aaa1a4b702b4782d131d51a72a46
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.raep.emnuvens.com.br:article/382
network_acronym_str ANGRAD-1
network_name_str Administração (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: THOUGHTS FROM THE PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS PERSPECTIVEA REVISÃO DE ARTIGOS CIENTÍFICOS NA ÁREA DE ADMINISTRAÇÃO: CONSIDERAÇÕES COM BASE NA HERMENÊUTICA FILOSÓFICApeer reviewPhilosophical HermeneuticsGadamerHermeneutics approachRevisão por ParesHermenêutica FilosóficaGadamerPostura HermenêuticaAlthough the evaluation of scientific papers is at the heart of all science, it is a process subject to inaccuracies. The objective of this work is to contribute to the improvement of this task through the theoretical framework of Philosophical Hermeneutics. The research examined two management journals, one Brazilian and the other Colombian, while the objects of the analysis were: (i) the paper assessment forms used by the journals, and (ii) the reviewers’ opinions on a sample of papers. The data collection technique used was documentary research and content analysis was employed as the methodological procedure. The findings revealed two journals with different assessment concepts and policies, of which we highlight (i) that a reviewer’s greatest contribution lies in his or her suggested recommendations, (ii) that there is no possibility of convergence among reviewers for any specific paper, (iii) the identification of a paper’s importance depends on the reviewer’s education, in a broad sense, and (iv) that reviewer training programs only ensure convergence with regard to a paper’s formal assessment. The conclusion reached is that adopting the Hermeneutics approach, as employed in this study, may lead to increased competence in reviewers.A avaliação de artigos científicos, embora esteja no coração de toda a ciência, é um processo que está sujeito a imprecisões. O objetivo deste trabalho é contribuir para o aprimoramento dessa tarefa, por meio do referencial teórico da Hermenêutica Filosófica. A pesquisa analisou duas revistas da área de Administração, uma brasileira e outra colombiana, tendo como objetos de análise (i) os formulários de avaliação de artigos das revistas e (ii) pareceres de avaliadores acerca de uma amostra de artigos. A técnica de coleta de dados utilizada foi a pesquisa documental e como procedimento metodológico, a Análise de Conteúdo. Os resultados da pesquisa revelaram duas revistas com concepções e políticas de avaliação distintas. Dentre as conclusões, destacam-se (i) que a maior contribuição do revisor se dá no âmbito das recomendações que ele faz ao artigo, (ii) que não há possibilidade de convergência entre revisores de um mesmo artigo, (iii) que a identificação da relevância do artigo depende da formação em sentido amplo do revisor, e (iv) que programas de treinamento de revisores garantem apenas convergência no que diz respeito à avaliação formal do artigo. Acredita-se que com a adoção de uma Postura Hermenêutica, procedimento identificado e assumido durante a pesquisa, a tarefa do avaliador pode ganhar em competência.Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)2015-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/38210.13058/raep.2015.v16n4.382Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa; Vol. 16 No. 4 (2015): Outubro-Dezembro; 695-722Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa; v. 16 n. 4 (2015): Outubro-Dezembro; 695-7222358-09172177-6083reponame:Administração (São Paulo. Online)instname:Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)instacron:ANGRADporhttps://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/382/193Dantas, Douglas CabralPatrus, Robertoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-10-29T14:43:33Zoai:ojs.raep.emnuvens.com.br:article/382Revistahttp://angrad.org.br/revistaPRIhttps://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/oaiangrad@angrad.org.br||raep@angrad.org.br2358-09172177-6083opendoar:2020-10-29T14:43:33Administração (São Paulo. Online) - Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: THOUGHTS FROM THE PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS PERSPECTIVE
A REVISÃO DE ARTIGOS CIENTÍFICOS NA ÁREA DE ADMINISTRAÇÃO: CONSIDERAÇÕES COM BASE NA HERMENÊUTICA FILOSÓFICA
title THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: THOUGHTS FROM THE PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS PERSPECTIVE
spellingShingle THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: THOUGHTS FROM THE PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS PERSPECTIVE
Dantas, Douglas Cabral
peer review
Philosophical Hermeneutics
Gadamer
Hermeneutics approach
Revisão por Pares
Hermenêutica Filosófica
Gadamer
Postura Hermenêutica
title_short THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: THOUGHTS FROM THE PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS PERSPECTIVE
title_full THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: THOUGHTS FROM THE PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS PERSPECTIVE
title_fullStr THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: THOUGHTS FROM THE PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS PERSPECTIVE
title_full_unstemmed THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: THOUGHTS FROM THE PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS PERSPECTIVE
title_sort THE REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS IN MANAGEMENT: THOUGHTS FROM THE PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS PERSPECTIVE
author Dantas, Douglas Cabral
author_facet Dantas, Douglas Cabral
Patrus, Roberto
author_role author
author2 Patrus, Roberto
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dantas, Douglas Cabral
Patrus, Roberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv peer review
Philosophical Hermeneutics
Gadamer
Hermeneutics approach
Revisão por Pares
Hermenêutica Filosófica
Gadamer
Postura Hermenêutica
topic peer review
Philosophical Hermeneutics
Gadamer
Hermeneutics approach
Revisão por Pares
Hermenêutica Filosófica
Gadamer
Postura Hermenêutica
description Although the evaluation of scientific papers is at the heart of all science, it is a process subject to inaccuracies. The objective of this work is to contribute to the improvement of this task through the theoretical framework of Philosophical Hermeneutics. The research examined two management journals, one Brazilian and the other Colombian, while the objects of the analysis were: (i) the paper assessment forms used by the journals, and (ii) the reviewers’ opinions on a sample of papers. The data collection technique used was documentary research and content analysis was employed as the methodological procedure. The findings revealed two journals with different assessment concepts and policies, of which we highlight (i) that a reviewer’s greatest contribution lies in his or her suggested recommendations, (ii) that there is no possibility of convergence among reviewers for any specific paper, (iii) the identification of a paper’s importance depends on the reviewer’s education, in a broad sense, and (iv) that reviewer training programs only ensure convergence with regard to a paper’s formal assessment. The conclusion reached is that adopting the Hermeneutics approach, as employed in this study, may lead to increased competence in reviewers.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/382
10.13058/raep.2015.v16n4.382
url https://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/382
identifier_str_mv 10.13058/raep.2015.v16n4.382
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://raep.emnuvens.com.br/raep/article/view/382/193
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa; Vol. 16 No. 4 (2015): Outubro-Dezembro; 695-722
Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa; v. 16 n. 4 (2015): Outubro-Dezembro; 695-722
2358-0917
2177-6083
reponame:Administração (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)
instacron:ANGRAD
instname_str Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)
instacron_str ANGRAD
institution ANGRAD
reponame_str Administração (São Paulo. Online)
collection Administração (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Administração (São Paulo. Online) - Associação Nacional dos Cursos de Graduação em Administração (ANGRAD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv angrad@angrad.org.br||raep@angrad.org.br
_version_ 1754212518856753152