The modes of provision of prison services in a comparative perspective

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cabral,Sandro
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Azevedo,Paulo F.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: BAR - Brazilian Administration Review
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922008000100005
Resumo: This paper aims to compare the performance of two modes of provision of prison services: public, and with the participation of private companies. There are few empirical studies concerning the alternative modes of governance in this sector, which differs from other public utilities in that there is an absence of network externalities and scale economies. In addition, an understanding of informal institutions is crucial for the performance of the service provider, either public or private. In this paper, we build a comparative analysis of two case studies of similar correctional facilities, one public and the other outsourced to a private company under the supervision of civil servants (hybrid governance structure), both located in the same region of Brazil. We found that the privately operated facility has achieved better performance indicators (in terms of number of escapes, riots, deaths, assistance to inmates etc.) than the public facility, which in part refutes the arguments of Hart, Shleifer and Vishny (1997) against private participation in prison services. We conclude that the reasons for these differences are related to lower levels of administrative controls; to the presence of civil servants within the privately operated prison, which contributes to reducing information asymmetries; to greater incentives for the private operator: to monitor employees, to bypass local judiciary constraints and to fulfill contractual obligations.
id ANPAD-1_045f354d9086230d8018ac5f46ff7e2c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1807-76922008000100005
network_acronym_str ANPAD-1
network_name_str BAR - Brazilian Administration Review
repository_id_str
spelling The modes of provision of prison services in a comparative perspectiveprisonsprivatizationpublic servicesThis paper aims to compare the performance of two modes of provision of prison services: public, and with the participation of private companies. There are few empirical studies concerning the alternative modes of governance in this sector, which differs from other public utilities in that there is an absence of network externalities and scale economies. In addition, an understanding of informal institutions is crucial for the performance of the service provider, either public or private. In this paper, we build a comparative analysis of two case studies of similar correctional facilities, one public and the other outsourced to a private company under the supervision of civil servants (hybrid governance structure), both located in the same region of Brazil. We found that the privately operated facility has achieved better performance indicators (in terms of number of escapes, riots, deaths, assistance to inmates etc.) than the public facility, which in part refutes the arguments of Hart, Shleifer and Vishny (1997) against private participation in prison services. We conclude that the reasons for these differences are related to lower levels of administrative controls; to the presence of civil servants within the privately operated prison, which contributes to reducing information asymmetries; to greater incentives for the private operator: to monitor employees, to bypass local judiciary constraints and to fulfill contractual obligations.ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração2008-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922008000100005BAR - Brazilian Administration Review v.5 n.1 2008reponame:BAR - Brazilian Administration Reviewinstname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)instacron:ANPAD10.1590/S1807-76922008000100005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCabral,SandroAzevedo,Paulo F.eng2009-09-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1807-76922008000100005Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1807-7692&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bar@anpad.org.br1807-76921807-7692opendoar:2009-09-25T00:00BAR - Brazilian Administration Review - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The modes of provision of prison services in a comparative perspective
title The modes of provision of prison services in a comparative perspective
spellingShingle The modes of provision of prison services in a comparative perspective
Cabral,Sandro
prisons
privatization
public services
title_short The modes of provision of prison services in a comparative perspective
title_full The modes of provision of prison services in a comparative perspective
title_fullStr The modes of provision of prison services in a comparative perspective
title_full_unstemmed The modes of provision of prison services in a comparative perspective
title_sort The modes of provision of prison services in a comparative perspective
author Cabral,Sandro
author_facet Cabral,Sandro
Azevedo,Paulo F.
author_role author
author2 Azevedo,Paulo F.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cabral,Sandro
Azevedo,Paulo F.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv prisons
privatization
public services
topic prisons
privatization
public services
description This paper aims to compare the performance of two modes of provision of prison services: public, and with the participation of private companies. There are few empirical studies concerning the alternative modes of governance in this sector, which differs from other public utilities in that there is an absence of network externalities and scale economies. In addition, an understanding of informal institutions is crucial for the performance of the service provider, either public or private. In this paper, we build a comparative analysis of two case studies of similar correctional facilities, one public and the other outsourced to a private company under the supervision of civil servants (hybrid governance structure), both located in the same region of Brazil. We found that the privately operated facility has achieved better performance indicators (in terms of number of escapes, riots, deaths, assistance to inmates etc.) than the public facility, which in part refutes the arguments of Hart, Shleifer and Vishny (1997) against private participation in prison services. We conclude that the reasons for these differences are related to lower levels of administrative controls; to the presence of civil servants within the privately operated prison, which contributes to reducing information asymmetries; to greater incentives for the private operator: to monitor employees, to bypass local judiciary constraints and to fulfill contractual obligations.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922008000100005
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922008000100005
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1807-76922008000100005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv BAR - Brazilian Administration Review v.5 n.1 2008
reponame:BAR - Brazilian Administration Review
instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)
instacron:ANPAD
instname_str Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)
instacron_str ANPAD
institution ANPAD
reponame_str BAR - Brazilian Administration Review
collection BAR - Brazilian Administration Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv BAR - Brazilian Administration Review - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||bar@anpad.org.br
_version_ 1754209122909159424