An Aggregate Taxonomy for Crowdsourcing Platforms, their Characteristics, and Intents
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922022000100303 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT This article intends to categorize different classifications used in the literature to distinguish among crowdsourcing platform types, based on their characteristics and intents. This is performed by means of a systematic literature review. The search for texts that combined the terms ‘crowdsourcing’ and ‘taxonomy,’ on the Google Scholar platform, resulted in 61 potential articles to be included in the corpus of the research, which were reduced to 13, after applying additional filtering. The study shows that taxonomies and classifications of platforms differ from author to author, each one of them adopting his/her own criteria and terminology. The 65 different crowdsourcing classifications that were found in the reviewed studies were reorganized in 16 groups, based on their characteristics. We believe that the current work contributes to the standardization of terminology and categorizations adopted in the literature and, therefore, to a better understanding of the crowdsourcing phenomenon. |
id |
ANPAD-1_1640858f227b1097fcddcb6328db294a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1807-76922022000100303 |
network_acronym_str |
ANPAD-1 |
network_name_str |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
An Aggregate Taxonomy for Crowdsourcing Platforms, their Characteristics, and Intentscrowdsourcingtaxonomyclassificationsystematic literature reviewtypes of platformsABSTRACT This article intends to categorize different classifications used in the literature to distinguish among crowdsourcing platform types, based on their characteristics and intents. This is performed by means of a systematic literature review. The search for texts that combined the terms ‘crowdsourcing’ and ‘taxonomy,’ on the Google Scholar platform, resulted in 61 potential articles to be included in the corpus of the research, which were reduced to 13, after applying additional filtering. The study shows that taxonomies and classifications of platforms differ from author to author, each one of them adopting his/her own criteria and terminology. The 65 different crowdsourcing classifications that were found in the reviewed studies were reorganized in 16 groups, based on their characteristics. We believe that the current work contributes to the standardization of terminology and categorizations adopted in the literature and, therefore, to a better understanding of the crowdsourcing phenomenon.ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922022000100303BAR - Brazilian Administration Review v.19 n.1 2022reponame:BAR - Brazilian Administration Reviewinstname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)instacron:ANPAD10.1590/1807-7692bar2022200071info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVianna,Fernando Ressetti Pinheiro MarquesGraeml,Alexandre ReisPeinado,Jurandireng2022-03-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1807-76922022000100303Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1807-7692&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bar@anpad.org.br1807-76921807-7692opendoar:2022-03-10T00:00BAR - Brazilian Administration Review - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
An Aggregate Taxonomy for Crowdsourcing Platforms, their Characteristics, and Intents |
title |
An Aggregate Taxonomy for Crowdsourcing Platforms, their Characteristics, and Intents |
spellingShingle |
An Aggregate Taxonomy for Crowdsourcing Platforms, their Characteristics, and Intents Vianna,Fernando Ressetti Pinheiro Marques crowdsourcing taxonomy classification systematic literature review types of platforms |
title_short |
An Aggregate Taxonomy for Crowdsourcing Platforms, their Characteristics, and Intents |
title_full |
An Aggregate Taxonomy for Crowdsourcing Platforms, their Characteristics, and Intents |
title_fullStr |
An Aggregate Taxonomy for Crowdsourcing Platforms, their Characteristics, and Intents |
title_full_unstemmed |
An Aggregate Taxonomy for Crowdsourcing Platforms, their Characteristics, and Intents |
title_sort |
An Aggregate Taxonomy for Crowdsourcing Platforms, their Characteristics, and Intents |
author |
Vianna,Fernando Ressetti Pinheiro Marques |
author_facet |
Vianna,Fernando Ressetti Pinheiro Marques Graeml,Alexandre Reis Peinado,Jurandir |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Graeml,Alexandre Reis Peinado,Jurandir |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vianna,Fernando Ressetti Pinheiro Marques Graeml,Alexandre Reis Peinado,Jurandir |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
crowdsourcing taxonomy classification systematic literature review types of platforms |
topic |
crowdsourcing taxonomy classification systematic literature review types of platforms |
description |
ABSTRACT This article intends to categorize different classifications used in the literature to distinguish among crowdsourcing platform types, based on their characteristics and intents. This is performed by means of a systematic literature review. The search for texts that combined the terms ‘crowdsourcing’ and ‘taxonomy,’ on the Google Scholar platform, resulted in 61 potential articles to be included in the corpus of the research, which were reduced to 13, after applying additional filtering. The study shows that taxonomies and classifications of platforms differ from author to author, each one of them adopting his/her own criteria and terminology. The 65 different crowdsourcing classifications that were found in the reviewed studies were reorganized in 16 groups, based on their characteristics. We believe that the current work contributes to the standardization of terminology and categorizations adopted in the literature and, therefore, to a better understanding of the crowdsourcing phenomenon. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922022000100303 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922022000100303 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1807-7692bar2022200071 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review v.19 n.1 2022 reponame:BAR - Brazilian Administration Review instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) instacron:ANPAD |
instname_str |
Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) |
instacron_str |
ANPAD |
institution |
ANPAD |
reponame_str |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
collection |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||bar@anpad.org.br |
_version_ |
1754209124255531008 |