Empowering and Resisting in a Sharing Economy: Two Sides of the Same Coin

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bó,Gicelda Julia Dal
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Petrini,Maira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: BAR - Brazilian Administration Review
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922019000300305
Resumo: Abstract Some can regard the sharing economy (SE) as a sustainable economy for allowing innovative (even disruptive) business opportunities and for encouraging new forms of consumption. There are, however, controversies about SE’s role in being a commercially-oriented economy taking advantage of regulatory and market failures. Such ambiguous trajectories provide opportunities for research, and one of them brings attention to power’s exercise to promote or influence change. This research, a single-case study of Uber, aims to understand the connections between framings to empower and to resist in a SE context. Three two-sided (empower and resist) perspectives - the economic system, the business market, and the sustainable-driven perspectives - and two strengthening actions - searching for legitimacy and fighting and calling for status quo - arise within the SE context analyzed. Empowering framings sounded more convincing compared to resisting ones, and resisting framings highlighted contradictions not expected from SE initiatives. Our findings suggest that SE does have the potential to stimulate a kind of non-reversible sustainable mindset, but this path choice is still unclear.
id ANPAD-1_4dec4c38eb0162f44810f3c20847c4cc
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1807-76922019000300305
network_acronym_str ANPAD-1
network_name_str BAR - Brazilian Administration Review
repository_id_str
spelling Empowering and Resisting in a Sharing Economy: Two Sides of the Same Coinsharing economysustainable developmentempowermentUbernarrative framingsAbstract Some can regard the sharing economy (SE) as a sustainable economy for allowing innovative (even disruptive) business opportunities and for encouraging new forms of consumption. There are, however, controversies about SE’s role in being a commercially-oriented economy taking advantage of regulatory and market failures. Such ambiguous trajectories provide opportunities for research, and one of them brings attention to power’s exercise to promote or influence change. This research, a single-case study of Uber, aims to understand the connections between framings to empower and to resist in a SE context. Three two-sided (empower and resist) perspectives - the economic system, the business market, and the sustainable-driven perspectives - and two strengthening actions - searching for legitimacy and fighting and calling for status quo - arise within the SE context analyzed. Empowering framings sounded more convincing compared to resisting ones, and resisting framings highlighted contradictions not expected from SE initiatives. Our findings suggest that SE does have the potential to stimulate a kind of non-reversible sustainable mindset, but this path choice is still unclear.ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922019000300305BAR - Brazilian Administration Review v.16 n.3 2019reponame:BAR - Brazilian Administration Reviewinstname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)instacron:ANPAD10.1590/1807-7692bar2019180133info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBó,Gicelda Julia DalPetrini,Mairaeng2019-12-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1807-76922019000300305Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1807-7692&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bar@anpad.org.br1807-76921807-7692opendoar:2019-12-09T00:00BAR - Brazilian Administration Review - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Empowering and Resisting in a Sharing Economy: Two Sides of the Same Coin
title Empowering and Resisting in a Sharing Economy: Two Sides of the Same Coin
spellingShingle Empowering and Resisting in a Sharing Economy: Two Sides of the Same Coin
Bó,Gicelda Julia Dal
sharing economy
sustainable development
empowerment
Uber
narrative framings
title_short Empowering and Resisting in a Sharing Economy: Two Sides of the Same Coin
title_full Empowering and Resisting in a Sharing Economy: Two Sides of the Same Coin
title_fullStr Empowering and Resisting in a Sharing Economy: Two Sides of the Same Coin
title_full_unstemmed Empowering and Resisting in a Sharing Economy: Two Sides of the Same Coin
title_sort Empowering and Resisting in a Sharing Economy: Two Sides of the Same Coin
author Bó,Gicelda Julia Dal
author_facet Bó,Gicelda Julia Dal
Petrini,Maira
author_role author
author2 Petrini,Maira
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bó,Gicelda Julia Dal
Petrini,Maira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv sharing economy
sustainable development
empowerment
Uber
narrative framings
topic sharing economy
sustainable development
empowerment
Uber
narrative framings
description Abstract Some can regard the sharing economy (SE) as a sustainable economy for allowing innovative (even disruptive) business opportunities and for encouraging new forms of consumption. There are, however, controversies about SE’s role in being a commercially-oriented economy taking advantage of regulatory and market failures. Such ambiguous trajectories provide opportunities for research, and one of them brings attention to power’s exercise to promote or influence change. This research, a single-case study of Uber, aims to understand the connections between framings to empower and to resist in a SE context. Three two-sided (empower and resist) perspectives - the economic system, the business market, and the sustainable-driven perspectives - and two strengthening actions - searching for legitimacy and fighting and calling for status quo - arise within the SE context analyzed. Empowering framings sounded more convincing compared to resisting ones, and resisting framings highlighted contradictions not expected from SE initiatives. Our findings suggest that SE does have the potential to stimulate a kind of non-reversible sustainable mindset, but this path choice is still unclear.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922019000300305
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922019000300305
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-7692bar2019180133
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv BAR - Brazilian Administration Review v.16 n.3 2019
reponame:BAR - Brazilian Administration Review
instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)
instacron:ANPAD
instname_str Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)
instacron_str ANPAD
institution ANPAD
reponame_str BAR - Brazilian Administration Review
collection BAR - Brazilian Administration Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv BAR - Brazilian Administration Review - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||bar@anpad.org.br
_version_ 1754209124173742080