Why is Academia Sometimes Detached from Firms’ Problems? The Unattractiveness of Research on Organizational Decline
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922020000400303 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT We examined how scholars decide what they study, scrutinizing researchers’ problem choice. We qualitatively analyzed a survey conducted by e-mail with 40 top management scholars on organizational decline in top-ranked journals. This topic appears to be neglected despite the real life evidence that the performance of firms is declining at an increasingly rapid pace. We conducted a content analysis of motivation to undertake, remain with, or abandon research. We found explanations for what researchers’ study specifically related to concerns over tenure and promotion, difficulty in conducting research, and the general unattractiveness of ‘negative’ themes that lead scholars to avoid a research topic. We contribute to studies on problem choice in management research by explaining why relevant economic and societal research agendas are under-researched. Our findings indicate that motivation not to undertake is related to extrinsic factors. Motivations to remain are usually intrinsic. However, motivations to abandon may be intrinsic, in order to move on to another research project, or extrinsic, depending on the situation. It also serves as a warning that scholars may be paying excessive attention to mainstream theoretical approaches and topics, inhibiting the emergence of new ideas and detracting attention from phenomena that are important for teaching. |
id |
ANPAD-1_55b560806ff1472655b9d7f6a32f7887 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1807-76922020000400303 |
network_acronym_str |
ANPAD-1 |
network_name_str |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Why is Academia Sometimes Detached from Firms’ Problems? The Unattractiveness of Research on Organizational Declineproblem choiceresearch prioritiesresearch motivationpublish or perishABSTRACT We examined how scholars decide what they study, scrutinizing researchers’ problem choice. We qualitatively analyzed a survey conducted by e-mail with 40 top management scholars on organizational decline in top-ranked journals. This topic appears to be neglected despite the real life evidence that the performance of firms is declining at an increasingly rapid pace. We conducted a content analysis of motivation to undertake, remain with, or abandon research. We found explanations for what researchers’ study specifically related to concerns over tenure and promotion, difficulty in conducting research, and the general unattractiveness of ‘negative’ themes that lead scholars to avoid a research topic. We contribute to studies on problem choice in management research by explaining why relevant economic and societal research agendas are under-researched. Our findings indicate that motivation not to undertake is related to extrinsic factors. Motivations to remain are usually intrinsic. However, motivations to abandon may be intrinsic, in order to move on to another research project, or extrinsic, depending on the situation. It also serves as a warning that scholars may be paying excessive attention to mainstream theoretical approaches and topics, inhibiting the emergence of new ideas and detracting attention from phenomena that are important for teaching.ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922020000400303BAR - Brazilian Administration Review v.17 n.4 2020reponame:BAR - Brazilian Administration Reviewinstname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)instacron:ANPAD10.1590/1807-7692bar2020200005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSerra,Fernando Antônio RibeiroFerreira,Manuel PortugalScafuto,Isabel Cristinaeng2021-03-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1807-76922020000400303Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1807-7692&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bar@anpad.org.br1807-76921807-7692opendoar:2021-03-02T00:00BAR - Brazilian Administration Review - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Why is Academia Sometimes Detached from Firms’ Problems? The Unattractiveness of Research on Organizational Decline |
title |
Why is Academia Sometimes Detached from Firms’ Problems? The Unattractiveness of Research on Organizational Decline |
spellingShingle |
Why is Academia Sometimes Detached from Firms’ Problems? The Unattractiveness of Research on Organizational Decline Serra,Fernando Antônio Ribeiro problem choice research priorities research motivation publish or perish |
title_short |
Why is Academia Sometimes Detached from Firms’ Problems? The Unattractiveness of Research on Organizational Decline |
title_full |
Why is Academia Sometimes Detached from Firms’ Problems? The Unattractiveness of Research on Organizational Decline |
title_fullStr |
Why is Academia Sometimes Detached from Firms’ Problems? The Unattractiveness of Research on Organizational Decline |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why is Academia Sometimes Detached from Firms’ Problems? The Unattractiveness of Research on Organizational Decline |
title_sort |
Why is Academia Sometimes Detached from Firms’ Problems? The Unattractiveness of Research on Organizational Decline |
author |
Serra,Fernando Antônio Ribeiro |
author_facet |
Serra,Fernando Antônio Ribeiro Ferreira,Manuel Portugal Scafuto,Isabel Cristina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferreira,Manuel Portugal Scafuto,Isabel Cristina |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Serra,Fernando Antônio Ribeiro Ferreira,Manuel Portugal Scafuto,Isabel Cristina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
problem choice research priorities research motivation publish or perish |
topic |
problem choice research priorities research motivation publish or perish |
description |
ABSTRACT We examined how scholars decide what they study, scrutinizing researchers’ problem choice. We qualitatively analyzed a survey conducted by e-mail with 40 top management scholars on organizational decline in top-ranked journals. This topic appears to be neglected despite the real life evidence that the performance of firms is declining at an increasingly rapid pace. We conducted a content analysis of motivation to undertake, remain with, or abandon research. We found explanations for what researchers’ study specifically related to concerns over tenure and promotion, difficulty in conducting research, and the general unattractiveness of ‘negative’ themes that lead scholars to avoid a research topic. We contribute to studies on problem choice in management research by explaining why relevant economic and societal research agendas are under-researched. Our findings indicate that motivation not to undertake is related to extrinsic factors. Motivations to remain are usually intrinsic. However, motivations to abandon may be intrinsic, in order to move on to another research project, or extrinsic, depending on the situation. It also serves as a warning that scholars may be paying excessive attention to mainstream theoretical approaches and topics, inhibiting the emergence of new ideas and detracting attention from phenomena that are important for teaching. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922020000400303 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922020000400303 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1807-7692bar2020200005 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review v.17 n.4 2020 reponame:BAR - Brazilian Administration Review instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) instacron:ANPAD |
instname_str |
Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) |
instacron_str |
ANPAD |
institution |
ANPAD |
reponame_str |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
collection |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||bar@anpad.org.br |
_version_ |
1754209124211490816 |