Why is Academia Sometimes Detached from Firms’ Problems? The Unattractiveness of Research on Organizational Decline

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Serra,Fernando Antônio Ribeiro
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Ferreira,Manuel Portugal, Scafuto,Isabel Cristina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: BAR - Brazilian Administration Review
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922020000400303
Resumo: ABSTRACT We examined how scholars decide what they study, scrutinizing researchers’ problem choice. We qualitatively analyzed a survey conducted by e-mail with 40 top management scholars on organizational decline in top-ranked journals. This topic appears to be neglected despite the real life evidence that the performance of firms is declining at an increasingly rapid pace. We conducted a content analysis of motivation to undertake, remain with, or abandon research. We found explanations for what researchers’ study specifically related to concerns over tenure and promotion, difficulty in conducting research, and the general unattractiveness of ‘negative’ themes that lead scholars to avoid a research topic. We contribute to studies on problem choice in management research by explaining why relevant economic and societal research agendas are under-researched. Our findings indicate that motivation not to undertake is related to extrinsic factors. Motivations to remain are usually intrinsic. However, motivations to abandon may be intrinsic, in order to move on to another research project, or extrinsic, depending on the situation. It also serves as a warning that scholars may be paying excessive attention to mainstream theoretical approaches and topics, inhibiting the emergence of new ideas and detracting attention from phenomena that are important for teaching.
id ANPAD-1_55b560806ff1472655b9d7f6a32f7887
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1807-76922020000400303
network_acronym_str ANPAD-1
network_name_str BAR - Brazilian Administration Review
repository_id_str
spelling Why is Academia Sometimes Detached from Firms’ Problems? The Unattractiveness of Research on Organizational Declineproblem choiceresearch prioritiesresearch motivationpublish or perishABSTRACT We examined how scholars decide what they study, scrutinizing researchers’ problem choice. We qualitatively analyzed a survey conducted by e-mail with 40 top management scholars on organizational decline in top-ranked journals. This topic appears to be neglected despite the real life evidence that the performance of firms is declining at an increasingly rapid pace. We conducted a content analysis of motivation to undertake, remain with, or abandon research. We found explanations for what researchers’ study specifically related to concerns over tenure and promotion, difficulty in conducting research, and the general unattractiveness of ‘negative’ themes that lead scholars to avoid a research topic. We contribute to studies on problem choice in management research by explaining why relevant economic and societal research agendas are under-researched. Our findings indicate that motivation not to undertake is related to extrinsic factors. Motivations to remain are usually intrinsic. However, motivations to abandon may be intrinsic, in order to move on to another research project, or extrinsic, depending on the situation. It also serves as a warning that scholars may be paying excessive attention to mainstream theoretical approaches and topics, inhibiting the emergence of new ideas and detracting attention from phenomena that are important for teaching.ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922020000400303BAR - Brazilian Administration Review v.17 n.4 2020reponame:BAR - Brazilian Administration Reviewinstname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)instacron:ANPAD10.1590/1807-7692bar2020200005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSerra,Fernando Antônio RibeiroFerreira,Manuel PortugalScafuto,Isabel Cristinaeng2021-03-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1807-76922020000400303Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1807-7692&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bar@anpad.org.br1807-76921807-7692opendoar:2021-03-02T00:00BAR - Brazilian Administration Review - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Why is Academia Sometimes Detached from Firms’ Problems? The Unattractiveness of Research on Organizational Decline
title Why is Academia Sometimes Detached from Firms’ Problems? The Unattractiveness of Research on Organizational Decline
spellingShingle Why is Academia Sometimes Detached from Firms’ Problems? The Unattractiveness of Research on Organizational Decline
Serra,Fernando Antônio Ribeiro
problem choice
research priorities
research motivation
publish or perish
title_short Why is Academia Sometimes Detached from Firms’ Problems? The Unattractiveness of Research on Organizational Decline
title_full Why is Academia Sometimes Detached from Firms’ Problems? The Unattractiveness of Research on Organizational Decline
title_fullStr Why is Academia Sometimes Detached from Firms’ Problems? The Unattractiveness of Research on Organizational Decline
title_full_unstemmed Why is Academia Sometimes Detached from Firms’ Problems? The Unattractiveness of Research on Organizational Decline
title_sort Why is Academia Sometimes Detached from Firms’ Problems? The Unattractiveness of Research on Organizational Decline
author Serra,Fernando Antônio Ribeiro
author_facet Serra,Fernando Antônio Ribeiro
Ferreira,Manuel Portugal
Scafuto,Isabel Cristina
author_role author
author2 Ferreira,Manuel Portugal
Scafuto,Isabel Cristina
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Serra,Fernando Antônio Ribeiro
Ferreira,Manuel Portugal
Scafuto,Isabel Cristina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv problem choice
research priorities
research motivation
publish or perish
topic problem choice
research priorities
research motivation
publish or perish
description ABSTRACT We examined how scholars decide what they study, scrutinizing researchers’ problem choice. We qualitatively analyzed a survey conducted by e-mail with 40 top management scholars on organizational decline in top-ranked journals. This topic appears to be neglected despite the real life evidence that the performance of firms is declining at an increasingly rapid pace. We conducted a content analysis of motivation to undertake, remain with, or abandon research. We found explanations for what researchers’ study specifically related to concerns over tenure and promotion, difficulty in conducting research, and the general unattractiveness of ‘negative’ themes that lead scholars to avoid a research topic. We contribute to studies on problem choice in management research by explaining why relevant economic and societal research agendas are under-researched. Our findings indicate that motivation not to undertake is related to extrinsic factors. Motivations to remain are usually intrinsic. However, motivations to abandon may be intrinsic, in order to move on to another research project, or extrinsic, depending on the situation. It also serves as a warning that scholars may be paying excessive attention to mainstream theoretical approaches and topics, inhibiting the emergence of new ideas and detracting attention from phenomena that are important for teaching.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922020000400303
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922020000400303
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-7692bar2020200005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv BAR - Brazilian Administration Review v.17 n.4 2020
reponame:BAR - Brazilian Administration Review
instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)
instacron:ANPAD
instname_str Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)
instacron_str ANPAD
institution ANPAD
reponame_str BAR - Brazilian Administration Review
collection BAR - Brazilian Administration Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv BAR - Brazilian Administration Review - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||bar@anpad.org.br
_version_ 1754209124211490816