How consumers persuade each other: rhetorical strategies of interpersonal influence in online communities
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922012000300002 |
Resumo: | Persuasive messages are central to interpersonal influence in online communities, where consumers interact mainly through text. We employed a combination of netnography and computer-mediated discourse analysis to investigate how consumers exchange information related to products and brands in an online community. We identified a set of rhetorical strategies used by community members, including setting expectations, claiming expertise, prescribing, and celebrating acquiescence. Consumers employ these rhetorical strategies to influence each other's consumption decisions, report consumption decisions back to the community, and to gauge their influence on each other's choices. We compare this process to traditional types of interpersonal influence and discuss how our findings contribute to advancing the burgeoning literature on interpersonal influence in online contexts. |
id |
ANPAD-1_c8b4cd792f141489c180e93039de8c85 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1807-76922012000300002 |
network_acronym_str |
ANPAD-1 |
network_name_str |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
How consumers persuade each other: rhetorical strategies of interpersonal influence in online communitiesconsumer decisioninterpersonal influenceonline communitiesPersuasive messages are central to interpersonal influence in online communities, where consumers interact mainly through text. We employed a combination of netnography and computer-mediated discourse analysis to investigate how consumers exchange information related to products and brands in an online community. We identified a set of rhetorical strategies used by community members, including setting expectations, claiming expertise, prescribing, and celebrating acquiescence. Consumers employ these rhetorical strategies to influence each other's consumption decisions, report consumption decisions back to the community, and to gauge their influence on each other's choices. We compare this process to traditional types of interpersonal influence and discuss how our findings contribute to advancing the burgeoning literature on interpersonal influence in online contexts.ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração2012-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922012000300002BAR - Brazilian Administration Review v.9 n.3 2012reponame:BAR - Brazilian Administration Reviewinstname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)instacron:ANPAD10.1590/S1807-76922012000300002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessScaraboto,DaianeRossi,Carlos Alberto VargasCosta,Diegoeng2012-07-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1807-76922012000300002Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1807-7692&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bar@anpad.org.br1807-76921807-7692opendoar:2012-07-16T00:00BAR - Brazilian Administration Review - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
How consumers persuade each other: rhetorical strategies of interpersonal influence in online communities |
title |
How consumers persuade each other: rhetorical strategies of interpersonal influence in online communities |
spellingShingle |
How consumers persuade each other: rhetorical strategies of interpersonal influence in online communities Scaraboto,Daiane consumer decision interpersonal influence online communities |
title_short |
How consumers persuade each other: rhetorical strategies of interpersonal influence in online communities |
title_full |
How consumers persuade each other: rhetorical strategies of interpersonal influence in online communities |
title_fullStr |
How consumers persuade each other: rhetorical strategies of interpersonal influence in online communities |
title_full_unstemmed |
How consumers persuade each other: rhetorical strategies of interpersonal influence in online communities |
title_sort |
How consumers persuade each other: rhetorical strategies of interpersonal influence in online communities |
author |
Scaraboto,Daiane |
author_facet |
Scaraboto,Daiane Rossi,Carlos Alberto Vargas Costa,Diego |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rossi,Carlos Alberto Vargas Costa,Diego |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Scaraboto,Daiane Rossi,Carlos Alberto Vargas Costa,Diego |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
consumer decision interpersonal influence online communities |
topic |
consumer decision interpersonal influence online communities |
description |
Persuasive messages are central to interpersonal influence in online communities, where consumers interact mainly through text. We employed a combination of netnography and computer-mediated discourse analysis to investigate how consumers exchange information related to products and brands in an online community. We identified a set of rhetorical strategies used by community members, including setting expectations, claiming expertise, prescribing, and celebrating acquiescence. Consumers employ these rhetorical strategies to influence each other's consumption decisions, report consumption decisions back to the community, and to gauge their influence on each other's choices. We compare this process to traditional types of interpersonal influence and discuss how our findings contribute to advancing the burgeoning literature on interpersonal influence in online contexts. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922012000300002 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922012000300002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1807-76922012000300002 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review v.9 n.3 2012 reponame:BAR - Brazilian Administration Review instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) instacron:ANPAD |
instname_str |
Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) |
instacron_str |
ANPAD |
institution |
ANPAD |
reponame_str |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
collection |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||bar@anpad.org.br |
_version_ |
1754209123314958337 |