Bibliographical research method for business administration studies: a model based on scientific journal ranking
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922008000200005 |
Resumo: | This article proposes a three-stage method, with the use of multiple rankings as a starting point in the first stage to help carry out bibliographical research in a more effective and systematic fashion. The relevance of this method is made evident by way of a pioneer empirical investigation on the use and importance of scientific journal rankings as perceived by Brazilian professors in the practice of bibliographical research in the field of Business Administration. The results suggest that, although there is an awareness of the importance of ranking as a criterion for bibliographical research, with a view to identifying the state of the art and relevant research gaps, ranking is in fact hardly used on a regular basis. It is believed that the proposed method can help overcome this problem and contribute to more effective literature reviews and research. |
id |
ANPAD-1_fbb280902774e41870f2fb95b811cd4e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1807-76922008000200005 |
network_acronym_str |
ANPAD-1 |
network_name_str |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Bibliographical research method for business administration studies: a model based on scientific journal rankingresearch methodologybusiness administration researchbibliographical researchrankingimpact factorThis article proposes a three-stage method, with the use of multiple rankings as a starting point in the first stage to help carry out bibliographical research in a more effective and systematic fashion. The relevance of this method is made evident by way of a pioneer empirical investigation on the use and importance of scientific journal rankings as perceived by Brazilian professors in the practice of bibliographical research in the field of Business Administration. The results suggest that, although there is an awareness of the importance of ranking as a criterion for bibliographical research, with a view to identifying the state of the art and relevant research gaps, ranking is in fact hardly used on a regular basis. It is believed that the proposed method can help overcome this problem and contribute to more effective literature reviews and research.ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração2008-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922008000200005BAR - Brazilian Administration Review v.5 n.2 2008reponame:BAR - Brazilian Administration Reviewinstname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)instacron:ANPAD10.1590/S1807-76922008000200005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVillas,Marcos ViannaMacedo-Soares,T. Diana L. van A. deRusso,Giuseppe Mariaeng2009-09-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1807-76922008000200005Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1807-7692&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bar@anpad.org.br1807-76921807-7692opendoar:2009-09-29T00:00BAR - Brazilian Administration Review - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Bibliographical research method for business administration studies: a model based on scientific journal ranking |
title |
Bibliographical research method for business administration studies: a model based on scientific journal ranking |
spellingShingle |
Bibliographical research method for business administration studies: a model based on scientific journal ranking Villas,Marcos Vianna research methodology business administration research bibliographical research ranking impact factor |
title_short |
Bibliographical research method for business administration studies: a model based on scientific journal ranking |
title_full |
Bibliographical research method for business administration studies: a model based on scientific journal ranking |
title_fullStr |
Bibliographical research method for business administration studies: a model based on scientific journal ranking |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bibliographical research method for business administration studies: a model based on scientific journal ranking |
title_sort |
Bibliographical research method for business administration studies: a model based on scientific journal ranking |
author |
Villas,Marcos Vianna |
author_facet |
Villas,Marcos Vianna Macedo-Soares,T. Diana L. van A. de Russo,Giuseppe Maria |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Macedo-Soares,T. Diana L. van A. de Russo,Giuseppe Maria |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Villas,Marcos Vianna Macedo-Soares,T. Diana L. van A. de Russo,Giuseppe Maria |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
research methodology business administration research bibliographical research ranking impact factor |
topic |
research methodology business administration research bibliographical research ranking impact factor |
description |
This article proposes a three-stage method, with the use of multiple rankings as a starting point in the first stage to help carry out bibliographical research in a more effective and systematic fashion. The relevance of this method is made evident by way of a pioneer empirical investigation on the use and importance of scientific journal rankings as perceived by Brazilian professors in the practice of bibliographical research in the field of Business Administration. The results suggest that, although there is an awareness of the importance of ranking as a criterion for bibliographical research, with a view to identifying the state of the art and relevant research gaps, ranking is in fact hardly used on a regular basis. It is believed that the proposed method can help overcome this problem and contribute to more effective literature reviews and research. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922008000200005 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-76922008000200005 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1807-76922008000200005 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review v.5 n.2 2008 reponame:BAR - Brazilian Administration Review instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) instacron:ANPAD |
instname_str |
Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) |
instacron_str |
ANPAD |
institution |
ANPAD |
reponame_str |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
collection |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
BAR - Brazilian Administration Review - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||bar@anpad.org.br |
_version_ |
1754209122917548032 |