Construction of technodiscourse objects: theoretical and methodological issues

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinheiro, Clemilton Lopes
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Nogueira, Stelyo Rubens de Souza
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista da ANPOLL (Online)
DOI: 10.18309/ranpoll.v54i1.1872
Texto Completo: https://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/1872
Resumo: In this work, we consider, on one hand, DDA (Digital Discourse Analysis) theoretical framework, proposed by Marie-Anne Paveau, whose object of study is technodiscourse, that is, digital native discursive productions that bring together language and technology – intrinsically linked – in a composite; on the other hand, the study of Lorenza Mondada, who proposes the notion of discourse objects, that is something around which the enunciative activity is organized in the practices of apprehension, formulation and description of the world by speakers. Given the specificities of technodiscourse, we propose the notion of technodiscourse object, that is, referents constructed by technodiscursive processes, as an analytical category of technodiscursive dynamics. The notions of object of discourse and object of technodiscourse therefore hold similarities, but also differences. This opens the way to the theoretical and methodological problematic around the construction of technodiscourse objects. Our goal is to reflect on this problematic.
id ANPOLL-2_275ab36093c5fad9308ca1c8a4c83a93
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br:article/1872
network_acronym_str ANPOLL-2
network_name_str Revista da ANPOLL (Online)
spelling Construction of technodiscourse objects: theoretical and methodological issuesA construção de objetos de tecnodiscurso: questões teórico-metodológicasDiscurso digitalObjeto de discursoObjeto de tecnodiscursoTecnodiscursoDigital DiscourseDiscourse ObjectsTechnodiscourse ObjectsTechnodiscourseIn this work, we consider, on one hand, DDA (Digital Discourse Analysis) theoretical framework, proposed by Marie-Anne Paveau, whose object of study is technodiscourse, that is, digital native discursive productions that bring together language and technology – intrinsically linked – in a composite; on the other hand, the study of Lorenza Mondada, who proposes the notion of discourse objects, that is something around which the enunciative activity is organized in the practices of apprehension, formulation and description of the world by speakers. Given the specificities of technodiscourse, we propose the notion of technodiscourse object, that is, referents constructed by technodiscursive processes, as an analytical category of technodiscursive dynamics. The notions of object of discourse and object of technodiscourse therefore hold similarities, but also differences. This opens the way to the theoretical and methodological problematic around the construction of technodiscourse objects. Our goal is to reflect on this problematic.Neste trabalho, consideramos, por um lado, o quadro teórico da ADD (Análise do Discurso Digital), proposto por Marie-Anne Paveau, que tem como objeto de estudo o tecnodiscurso, isto é, produções discursivas digitais nativas que reúnem linguagem e tecnologia – intrinsecamente ligadas – em um compósito; por outro lado, o estudo de Lorenza Mondada, que propõe a noção de objetos de discurso como algo (uma espécie de “referente” discursivamente construído) em torno do qual a atividade enunciativa se organiza nas práticas de apreensão, formulação e descrição do mundo pelos falantes. Dadas as especificidades do tecnodiscurso, propomos a noção de objeto de tecnodiscurso, ou seja, referentes construídos pelos processos tecnodiscursivos, como categoria analítica da dinâmica tecnodiscursiva. As noções de objeto de discurso e objetos de tecnodiscurso guardam, portanto, semelhanças, mas também diferenças. Isso abre caminho para a problemática teórico-metodológica em torno da construção dos objetos de tecnodiscurso. Nosso objetivo é, portanto, apontar alguns elementos de reflexão sobre essa problemática.ANPOLL2023-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/187210.18309/ranpoll.v54i1.1872Revista da Anpoll; Vol. 54 No. 1 (2023); e1872Revista da Anpoll; v. 54 n. 1 (2023); e18721982-78301414-756410.18309/ranpoll.v54i1reponame:Revista da ANPOLL (Online)instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Letras e Lingüística (ANPOLL)instacron:ANPOLLporhttps://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/1872/1387Copyright (c) 2023 Revista da Anpollhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinheiro, Clemilton Lopes Nogueira, Stelyo Rubens de Souza2024-01-26T21:03:24Zoai:ojs.revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br:article/1872Revistahttps://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/indexONGhttps://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/oairevistadaanpoll@gmail.com||secretarial.editorial@editoraletra1.com1982-78301414-7564opendoar:2024-01-26T21:03:24Revista da ANPOLL (Online) - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Letras e Lingüística (ANPOLL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Construction of technodiscourse objects: theoretical and methodological issues
A construção de objetos de tecnodiscurso: questões teórico-metodológicas
title Construction of technodiscourse objects: theoretical and methodological issues
spellingShingle Construction of technodiscourse objects: theoretical and methodological issues
Construction of technodiscourse objects: theoretical and methodological issues
Pinheiro, Clemilton Lopes
Discurso digital
Objeto de discurso
Objeto de tecnodiscurso
Tecnodiscurso
Digital Discourse
Discourse Objects
Technodiscourse Objects
Technodiscourse
Pinheiro, Clemilton Lopes
Discurso digital
Objeto de discurso
Objeto de tecnodiscurso
Tecnodiscurso
Digital Discourse
Discourse Objects
Technodiscourse Objects
Technodiscourse
title_short Construction of technodiscourse objects: theoretical and methodological issues
title_full Construction of technodiscourse objects: theoretical and methodological issues
title_fullStr Construction of technodiscourse objects: theoretical and methodological issues
Construction of technodiscourse objects: theoretical and methodological issues
title_full_unstemmed Construction of technodiscourse objects: theoretical and methodological issues
Construction of technodiscourse objects: theoretical and methodological issues
title_sort Construction of technodiscourse objects: theoretical and methodological issues
author Pinheiro, Clemilton Lopes
author_facet Pinheiro, Clemilton Lopes
Pinheiro, Clemilton Lopes
Nogueira, Stelyo Rubens de Souza
Nogueira, Stelyo Rubens de Souza
author_role author
author2 Nogueira, Stelyo Rubens de Souza
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinheiro, Clemilton Lopes
Nogueira, Stelyo Rubens de Souza
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Discurso digital
Objeto de discurso
Objeto de tecnodiscurso
Tecnodiscurso
Digital Discourse
Discourse Objects
Technodiscourse Objects
Technodiscourse
topic Discurso digital
Objeto de discurso
Objeto de tecnodiscurso
Tecnodiscurso
Digital Discourse
Discourse Objects
Technodiscourse Objects
Technodiscourse
description In this work, we consider, on one hand, DDA (Digital Discourse Analysis) theoretical framework, proposed by Marie-Anne Paveau, whose object of study is technodiscourse, that is, digital native discursive productions that bring together language and technology – intrinsically linked – in a composite; on the other hand, the study of Lorenza Mondada, who proposes the notion of discourse objects, that is something around which the enunciative activity is organized in the practices of apprehension, formulation and description of the world by speakers. Given the specificities of technodiscourse, we propose the notion of technodiscourse object, that is, referents constructed by technodiscursive processes, as an analytical category of technodiscursive dynamics. The notions of object of discourse and object of technodiscourse therefore hold similarities, but also differences. This opens the way to the theoretical and methodological problematic around the construction of technodiscourse objects. Our goal is to reflect on this problematic.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/1872
10.18309/ranpoll.v54i1.1872
url https://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/1872
identifier_str_mv 10.18309/ranpoll.v54i1.1872
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistadaanpoll.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/1872/1387
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista da Anpoll
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista da Anpoll
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ANPOLL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ANPOLL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Anpoll; Vol. 54 No. 1 (2023); e1872
Revista da Anpoll; v. 54 n. 1 (2023); e1872
1982-7830
1414-7564
10.18309/ranpoll.v54i1
reponame:Revista da ANPOLL (Online)
instname:Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Letras e Lingüística (ANPOLL)
instacron:ANPOLL
instname_str Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Letras e Lingüística (ANPOLL)
instacron_str ANPOLL
institution ANPOLL
reponame_str Revista da ANPOLL (Online)
collection Revista da ANPOLL (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da ANPOLL (Online) - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Letras e Lingüística (ANPOLL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadaanpoll@gmail.com||secretarial.editorial@editoraletra1.com
_version_ 1822178895011512320
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.18309/ranpoll.v54i1.1872

Registros relacionados